Turns out that 10% mortality is way off the mark. It also appears that this idea of people catching it off of surfaces isn't the boogeyman we were all told it was.
Turns out that 10% mortality is way off the mark. It also appears that this idea of people catching it off of surfaces isn't the boogeyman we were all told it was.
I know you're being cute, but I actually agree with you. We still would need a vaccine though.Believe it or not, you can isolate just the vulnerable. Just crazy enough to work, right?
Statistically that's incorrect and I wasn't being cute. Initially I was very concerned as me information presents itself I reevaluate my position. We're not seeing 1 in 10 people who contract it die, and we're not seeing similar death rates across all demographics.I know you're being cute, but I actually agree with you. We still would need a vaccine though.
can you tho? many elderly live with children and grandchildren. sometimes in cramped apartmentsBelieve it or not, you can isolate just the vulnerable. Just crazy enough to work, right?
This is a valid point, but it's not as if people in those positions cant make their own decisions. If we didnt have anyone at home we'd be able to assign more help to those who pose the biggest risk.can you tho? many elderly live with children and grandchildren. sometimes in cramped apartments
I don't have the stats. but my gut tells me that this reopenkng is going to disproportionately kill lower class and middle class elderly. I guess business as usual for America lolThis is a valid point, but it's not as if people in those positions cant make their own decisions. If we didnt have anyone at home we'd be able to assign more help to those who pose the biggest risk.
Yes being intubated and sedated is no bueno
My parents are 66 (with heart condition) and 76 years old. I don't want them to get the Rona and die. They also don't want to get the Rona and die. So they're staying the fuck home. People need to take an actual risk assessment and make a decision but blanket closing everything is going to have horrible long term effectsI don't have the stats. but my gut tells me that this reopenkng is going to disproportionately kill lower class and middle class elderly. I guess business as usual for America lol
hamster study lolit's only been 2 hours, and usually it takes 3 for me to forget things, but I'm gonna post this anyway since the timing of it works for this thread
agreed, unless congress passed relevant stimulusMy parents are 66 (with heart condition) and 76 years old. I don't want them to get the Rona and die. They also don't want to get the Rona and die. So they're staying the fuck home. People need to take an actual risk assessment and make a decision but blanket closing everything is going to have horrible long term effects
also, a zipper nullifies the point of tbe mask. so the only "benefit" is the "convenience" of pulling a zipper and eating through a mask as opposed to taking 2 seconds to remove it (im being sarcastic)hamster study lol
I found it funny they showed the mask with a valve that doesn't stop any of the particles...It only filters what you breath in but not what you breath out...which defeats the point of not infecting people
How effective are Vaccines for the Flu?And my thoughts on herd immunity, how has that worked out for the flu?
ya that video was almost all just jokes...even got a toilet paper hoarding joke in and a black vs white joke inalso, a zipper nullifies the point of tbe mask. so the only "benefit" is the "convenience" of pulling a zipper and eating through a mask as opposed to taking 2 seconds to remove it (im being sarcastic)
I don't remember anyone with credibility claiming there would be a 10% mortality rate.Turns out that 10% mortality is way off the mark. It also appears that this idea of people catching it off of surfaces isn't the boogeyman we were all told it was.
That was Italy's when people said "We're going to be the next Italy."I don't remember anyone with credibility claiming there would be a 10% mortality rate.
Also did you not read @kneeblock's thread? He was sheltering in place and caught it from a surface
We can't know about 1 out of 10. The numbers are fucked. Per area and demographic it is drastically different, and the numbers are unreliable, unfortunately. Better safe than sorry? We are at this point regardless and if a stupid mask puts be back working then so be it. It's simply where we are right now.Statistically that's incorrect and I wasn't being cute. Initially I was very concerned as me information presents itself I reevaluate my position. We're not seeing 1 in 10 people who contract it die, and we're not seeing similar death rates across all demographics.
That's disingenuous. We definitely know about 1 in 10 turns out it's probably more like 1 in 1000 when you consider the underreporting of recoveries and the overreporting of deaths.We can't know about 1 out of 10. The numbers are fucked. Per area and demographic it is drastically different, and the numbers are unreliable, unfortunately. Better safe than sorry? We are at this point regardless and if a stupid mask puts be back working then so be it. It's simply where we are right now.
Definitely or probably? It doesn't sound exact to me. Sounds like we don't know.That's disingenuous. We definitely know about 1 in 10 turns out it's probably more like 1 in 1000 when you consider the underreporting of recoveries and the overreporting of deaths.
there's likely an under reporting of deaths since people who die at home arent being counted yet, unless I'm mistaken. id imagine the true mortality tho is like 0.5%.That's disingenuous. We definitely know about 1 in 10 turns out it's probably more like 1 in 1000 when you consider the underreporting of recoveries and the overreporting of deaths.
In some states anyone who dies with Covid is counted as a Covid death whether or not it was the main factor. I think its Colorado where they're going over their numbers and reducing them because of it. .5% seems about right for mortality.there's likely an under reporting of deaths since people who die at home arent being counted yet, unless I'm mistaken. id imagine the true mortality tho is like 0.5%.
we will see
1 in 10 was the number out of Italy that spurred all of this drastic action.Definitely or probably? It doesn't sound exact to me. Sounds like we don't know.
is it a significant? I know trump used an example of "people with corona who fall down the stairs and die," but im not sure thats as many people as he might think it is lolIn some states anyone who dies with Covid is counted as a Covid death whether or not it was the main factor. I think its Colorado where they're going over their numbers and reducing them because of it. .5% seems about right for mortality.
In Illinois they were counting people who were already in palliative care before contracting Corona.is it a significant? I know trump used an example of "people with corona who fall down the stairs and die," but im not sure thats as many people as he might think it is lol
Lolwutprobably more like 1 in 1000 when you consider the underreporting of recoveries and the overreporting of deaths.