You're actually not. People in the workforce below the poverty line is unquestionably the best indicator for how "workers" are doing.I am talking about workers.
You're actually not. People in the workforce below the poverty line is unquestionably the best indicator for how "workers" are doing.I am talking about workers.
That doesn't inflate the price of all houses. It decreases the supply of one type of home, but creates the need for another (less expensive) type of home.Rich guy inflates the price of his house cos other rich guys will buy it.
Is the percentage you quoted the percentage of workers below the poverty line or the total number?You're actually not. People in the workforce below the poverty line is unquestionably the best indicator for how "workers" are doing.
You're getting Jeb Bush'd in this debate... you need to come out stronger!That doesn't inflate the price of all houses. It decreases the supply of one type of home, but creates the need for another (less expensive) type of home.
I could certainly be mistaken but generally income stats are only counted for those regarded as being in the labor pool and their dependants. Much the same way that unemployment stats only cover those whom are seeking work.Is the percentage you quoted the percentage of workers below the poverty line or the total number?
he also (allegedly) helped cover up the place of death & stonewalled the investigation.brett kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of vince foster and was ken starrs deputy iin the bill clinton impeachment investigation
You're getting Jeb Bush'd in this debate... you need to come out stronger!
Rugged individualists to some, dangerous arsonists to others, a father and son who were convicted of intentionally setting fires on public land in Oregon were pardoned Tuesday by President Donald Trump.
The move came years after the convictions of Dwight and Steven Hammond, part of a family in the high desert of eastern Oregon known for its generosity and community contributions. Now, the pardon is raising concerns that it will encourage others to actively oppose federal control of public land.
“Our family is grateful to the president and all who worked to make this possible,” the Hammond family said in a statement.
Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, a well-known figure in the battle over public land, welcomed the pardons, saying the Hammonds were victims of federal overreach.
“Now we’ve finally got a president of the United States who is paying attention to what is going on,” Bundy said.
Jamie Rappaport Clark, president of the group Defenders of Wildlife, countered that the Hammonds were convicted of arson, a serious crime.
“Whatever prompted President Trump to pardon them, we hope that it is not seen as an encouragement to those who might use violence to seize federal property and threaten federal employees in the West,” Clark said.
Federal prosecutors painted sinister portraits of the Hammonds at their trial.
Witnesses testified that a 2001 arson fire occurred shortly after Steven Hammond and his hunting party illegally slaughtered deer on federal Bureau of Land Management property.
One said Steven Hammond handed out matches with instructions to “light up the whole country,” and another testified that Hammond barely escaped the roaring flames.
The fire burned 139 acres (56 hectares) of public land and destroyed all evidence of the game violations, the U.S. attorney’s office said.
The jury also convicted Steven Hammond for a 2006 blaze that prosecutors said began when he started several back fires, violating a burn ban, to save his winter feed after lightning started numerous fires nearby.
The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 called for mandatory five-year sentences for the convictions. But U.S. District Judge Michael R. Hogan said such a lengthy sentence “would not meet any idea I have of justice, proportionality ... it would be a sentence which would shock the conscience to me.”
Hogan instead sentenced Dwight Hammond to three months in prison and Steven Hammond to a year and one day. However, in October 2015, a federal appeals court ordered them to be resentenced to the mandatory prison time.
The new sentences became a cause celebre for those who oppose federal control of public lands, leading to the armed occupation of Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon for 41 days in 2016.
One occupier was shot dead by Oregon State Police. They say he reached for a pistol at a roadblock.
The U.S. attorney for Oregon, Billy Williams, justified the mandatory sentences, saying they’re “intended to be long enough to deter those like the Hammonds who disregard the law and place firefighters and others in jeopardy.” Williams declined to comment on the pardons.
Dozens of armed people, many from out of state, who occupied the refuge near the Hammond ranch said the father and son were victims of federal overreach. They changed the name of the refuge to Harney County Resource Center, reflecting their belief that the federal government has only a limited right to own property within a state.
Ammon and Ryan Bundy, two sons of Cliven Bundy, and five other defendants were acquitted in 2016 by a federal jury in Portland on charges stemming from the takeover.
In a statement Tuesday, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders called the five-year sentences for the Hammonds “unjust.”
“Justice is overdue for Dwight and Steven Hammond,” she said.
Lyle Hammond, another of Dwight Hammond’s sons, said Tuesday that his father and brother have been released from a federal prison south of Los Angeles but he didn’t know their whereabouts.
Republican U.S. Rep. Greg Walden of Oregon said Trump’s action is “a win for justice, and an acknowledgement of our unique way of life in the high desert, rural West.”
Oregon Wild, which works to protect and restore Oregon wildlands, wildlife and waters, sees a darker impact from the pardon.
“From the Bundys to logging and oil companies, special interests are working with the Trump administration to dismantle America’s public lands heritage, and this will be viewed as a victory in that effort,” spokesman Arran Robertson said.
Donald Tusk, the president of the European Council called on President Trump early Tuesday morning to stop criticizing America’s allies because “you don’t have that many after all”
“Dear America, appreciate your allies, after all you don’t have that many,” Donald Tusk said after signing a joint European Union-NATO declaration on cooperation with alliance Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg in Brussels.” Tusk has before been a vocal critic of Trump’s rhetoric toward NATO, tweeting in May when Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear agreement that “with friends like that, who needs enemies.” Tusk took further aim at Trump on Tuesday at a joint EU-NATO declaration, telling Trump that “it is always worth knowing who your strategic friend is and who is your strategic problem.” When Trump was asked the tough question that if he considered Putin a friend or foe, he said in response that “I really can’t say right now. As far as I’m concerned, a competitor. A competitor,” the president said. “I think that getting along with Russia, getting along with China, getting along with others, is a good thing, not a bad thing.”
Concerning his long list of trips to the UK, Brussel, and Finland, Trump said “I have NATO, I have the UK,which is in somewhat turmoil, and I have Putin,” he said. “Frankly, Putin may be the easiest of them all. Who would think?” He also brushed off Tusk’s warning about alienating American allies.”Well, we do have a lot of allies. But we cannot be taken advantage of. We’re being taken advantage of by the European Union,” he said, referring to trade issues with the EU. Along with trade policies, Trump has been demanding that NATO members increase their defense spending to come into line with a 2014 commitment while complaining that Europe benefits more from the partnership than the United States. The president knocked NATO members again in a tweet Tuesday before leaving for the two-day summit in Brussels.
Tensions are high as Trump heads back to Europe to meet with traditional American allies, some of whom were angered last month at the G7 conference in Canada. Questions linger about a potential trade war with the EU. In the past couple of weeks, Trump has announced new tariffs against European allies and has repeatedly denounced the transatlantic alliance, increasing political pressure on NATO allies ahead of this week. The all this made Donald Tusk as the president of the European Council to send tweet as response and say “Dear @realDonaldTrump. US doesn’t have and won’t have a better ally than EU. We spend on defense much more than Russia and as much as China,” Tusk wrote. “I hope you have no doubt this is an investment in our security, which cannot be said with confidence about Russian & Chinese spending ”
Following Tusk’s tweet, Trump wrote “NATO countries must pay MORE, the United States must pay LESS. Very Unfair!” “The U.S. is spending many times more than any other country in order to protect them. Not fair to the U.S. taxpayer. On top of that we lose $151 Billion on Trade with the European Union. Charge us big Tariffs (& Barriers)!” Tusk reminded Trump that the first time NATO’s mutual defense clause to assist other members under attack came after the terror attacks on 9/11 and that 870 European troops have fought and died in Afghanistan. “Mr. President, please remember about this tomorrow when we meet at the NATO summit. But above all when you meet President Putin in Helsinki,” he said.
The Trump administration is readying tariffs on another $200 billion US in Chinese imports, ranging from burglar alarms to mackerel.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative published the list of more than 6,031 product lines Tuesday and proposed 10 per cent tariffs on them. The office will hear public comments on the plan and will reach a decision after Aug. 31, according to a senior administration official who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity.
Donald Tusk is a piece of shit and is trying to win the Kalergi award.
I wish he'd follow it up with "And if we need to fix the current process to grant new citizenship, then we need to look at that too."
Fake news as usual.
He's against people claiming assylum and refugees, which are legal routes. It's not about people choosing legal routes it's more about playing to his base that are against all immigration. You won't see Trump reforming the system to create a legimitate route for people to gain citizenship. I mean his ICE is deporting people that served two tours in Afghanistan for America.I wish he'd follow it up with "And if we need to fix the current process to grant new citizenship, then we need to look at that too."
It's a two part problem. The legal path is way too difficult and expensive. The illegal way is far too easy and cheap. It's not all that surprising to see folks choosing the path of least resistance.
I don't think this is true.It's not about people choosing legal routes it's more about playing to his base that are against all immigration.
You guys need an immigration policy more like the one we have here in Canada - something Trump aspires to create!I wish he'd follow it up with "And if we need to fix the current process to grant new citizenship, then we need to look at that too."
It's a two part problem. The legal path is way too difficult and expensive. The illegal way is far too easy and cheap. It's not all that surprising to see folks choosing the path of least resistance.
Ignored by the media.He had a rally a few weeks back where he said "we're all for people coming here legally" and the whole place erupted in applause.