How can you tell what alloy that is?lots of footage and reports of molten steel for more than a week after the event
have you maybe ever thought of the possibility that @Outlaw Shit maybe already saw this video or already knows what worthless information you're about shove down his throat?You can rainbow me all you want homie, but the fact that you rainbowed me 3 seconds after I posted a 4 minute video, shows:
- You didn't watch the video
- You have no intent of understanding the science behind the collapse - which is fully explained in the video.
But You just rainbow on, @Outlaw Shit
Not a chance in hell. He's just an ignorant person without a formal educationhave you maybe ever thought of the possibility that @Outlaw Shit maybe already saw this video or already knows what worthless information you're about shove down his throat?
Not a chance in hell. He's just an ignorant person without a formal education
Just look at his face. A face like that is not capable of copy-pasta.I seriously hope this is a copy-paste
Not a chance in hell.have you maybe ever thought of the possibility that @Outlaw Shit maybe already saw this video or already knows what worthless information you're about shove down his throat?
https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1512-20490-8452/403_apc.pdfClearly says it didn't melt steel
https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1512-20490-8452/403_apc.pdf
https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1512-20490-8452/403_apc.pdf
"The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires."
My point is this investigation was not done by NIST...therefore there has been no real investigation.
No reason given for the sulfur...other than...
You said nist was untrustworthy so why do they need to do it?My point is this much needed investigation was not done by NIST...therefore, there has been no real investigation.
Sulfur bro, look into it
NIST is the official storyYou said nist was untrustworthy so why do they need to do it?
Point is, I ain't buying the official narrative.You keep changing your sulphur stuff. What's your point?
I changed my sulfur sentence, because no point going there if you aren't open to discussing thermite or thermate.
OK you got meHow could those corroded beams be from thermite when their temperatures clearly never got hot enough to indicate anything other than a fire?
All I asked was how you knew that was molten steel and you posted this stuff.
OK you got me
Building 7 fell from office fires, all the beams just gave out from a fire on a few parts of the building
I cannot identify that myselfThat doesn't have anything to do with the molten steel. I asked a simple question about how one can identify an alloy from a video.
I have also poster two other burning buildings that fall in similar fashion so maybe they are all blown up...but I didn't ask about that. Just how the alloy is identified as molten steel.
Maybe you have evidence.I cannot identify that myself
you know this, I know this
So how can footage tell? Where's the footage (I was okay just assuming the video above was some of it )?lots of footage and reports of molten steel for more than a week after the event
The FEMA report documented it