And then the memes.
ok mate.
I genuinely thought we were having a conversation.
my bad.
I forgot the rule of the internets.
when one is losing post a funny a picture.
so much winning
i don't understand how a centrally-planning bureaucracy is going to be more adept at responding to market changes with innovation than privately-held or publicly-traded administrators.Well it wouldn't change.
The difference is we are shareholders.
They are salaried employees with targets to achieve.
Our airlines over here won't need bail outs.....yet.
They are run better. Or worse depending on your point of view. Ryan air is the most profitable airline in the world. easyJet is almost as successful.
Leary the CEO of Ryan air took your model and made it even more streamlined. At one point he wanted to charge you for using the toilets .
It can be a new model of public ownership. Not like the past.
It's not beyond our level of intellect to learn from the past and improve it.
We can't just keep bailing out failed companies with no compensation.
Lol . Keep reaching for any hope that you arent the joke of the forum. Pay no attention to all the posts that show how idiotic yours are through proof..just deflectAnd then the memes.
ok mate.
I genuinely thought we were having a conversation.
my bad.
I forgot the rule of the internets.
when one is losing post a funny a picture.
so much winning
i don't understand how a centrally-planning bureaucracy is going to be more adept at responding to market changes with innovation than privately-held or publicly-traded administrators.
so who actually runs the business? people who are appointed, people who are elected, people who are appointed by people who are elected?Because you are thinking of old models.
it wouldn’t be centrally controlled.
it would as a de facto private company with a profit and loss sheet and at the end of the tax year profits would be given to the shareholders.
except this time we are the shareholders
You're just trying to argue.And then the memes.
ok mate.
I genuinely thought we were having a conversation.
my bad.
I forgot the rule of the internets.
when one is losing post a funny a picture.
so much winning
Would it be as successful as the USPS?it would as a de facto private company with a profit and loss sheet and at the end of the tax year profits would be given to the shareholders.
except this time we are the shareholders
so who actually runs the business? people who are appointed, people who are elected, people who are appointed by people who are elected?
genuine interest in how this model differs from something like the US Post Office
You're just trying to argue.
I've explained the way of the world to you and given you valuable information, but you've chosen not to accept it.
That's fine.
But I feel I'm wasting my time. Enlightening you is like trying to teach a pig to fly.
Thanks for not apologizing.What I will say. And it’s not an apology I thought I was answering captain spam when I brought up trusted news sources.
but I’m fine with you insulting me. You are a master of the universe.
I would make it a workers co-op such that the profits are shared with the employees. Democratise it too. Employees vote on their bosses.Because you are thinking of old models.
it wouldn’t be centrally controlled.
it would as a de facto private company with a profit and loss sheet and at the end of the tax year profits would be given to the shareholders.
except this time we are the shareholders