@Rambo John J Russia has gotten to you.I don't believe stuff like this at first glance. Especially right now when we are being flooded with fake news and propoganda. There was another site that was going viral not long ago that connected bill gates and the who, with efforts of microchip implants. Very plausible, but it came out that it was a fake site that Russians created it. I'll see if I can find it. It was well done and looked real. I'm guessing the purpose of stuff like this is to sow seeds of distrust of government. And of course, Americans are very sucseptible of this.
This has been reported by thousands of sources for months, since the beginning. I made a thread you were in months ago that hit on some of it, remember?I don't believe stuff like this at first glance. Especially right now when we are being flooded with fake news and propoganda. There was another site that was going viral not long ago that connected bill gates and the who, with efforts of microchip implants. Very plausible, but it came out that it was a fake site that Russians created it. I'll see if I can find it. It was well done and looked real. I'm guessing the purpose of stuff like this is to sow seeds of distrust of government. And of course, Americans are very sucseptible of this.
All I'm saying is that I was duped before by some b.s. someone was passing around a site that looked real enough and come to find out it was made by Russians. Why would someone go thru the trouble of making a site like that, and it was well done mind you... With no returns on time invested? It is also common knowledge that countries like Russia and China spend a fortune on shit like this. Pretty sure the 5g and covid connection turned out to be Russian bullshit too. I did not swallow that one though.This has been reported by thousands of sources for months, since the beginning. I made a thread you were in months ago that hit on some of it, remember?
This is nothing more than a world body President announcing it.
The points he's said are irrefutable, readily available all over the place.
Again, the story is a country President announcing it.
Denying Gates motives and involvement is complete ignorance, in the literal meaning.
The plot thickens.Here's the fort detrick study reference
Two major Corona virus outbreaks had already occurred in almost become pandemics. The paper describes Future worries at the same but that it will eventually get it right.
Strangely the YouTube does not have the Rockefeller paper in the comment so if anybody could just post the Rockefeller paper that he supposedly referencing it would be nice to read it
You should Google it and see which websites are reporting it and go from there...Here's the fort detrick study reference
Two major Corona virus outbreaks had already occurred in almost become pandemics. The paper describes Future worries at the same but that it will eventually get it right.
Strangely the YouTube does not have the Rockefeller paper in the comment so if anybody could just post the Rockefeller paper that he supposedly referencing it would be nice to read it
The plot thickens.
Voice dismissed as poor imitation of country's leader
Online posts viewed thousands of times claim that a 14-minute audio message covering various conspiracy theories about COVID-19’s origin was voiced by Ghanaian President Nana Akufo-Addo. The claim is false; the recording does not match Akufo-Addo’s voice while his information minister dismissed...factcheck.afp.com
There is a link to a PDF file in this link.Here's the fort detrick study reference
Two major Corona virus outbreaks had already occurred in almost become pandemics. The paper describes Future worries at the same but that it will eventually get it right.
Strangely the YouTube does not have the Rockefeller paper in the comment so if anybody could just post the Rockefeller paper that he supposedly referencing it would be nice to read it
I have tried that but of course none of them actually have the Rockefeller paper that he is supposedly referencing and even typing in exact quotes from what he's saying doesn't pull up anything on GoogleYou should Google it and see which websites are reporting it and go from there...
Try duck duck go or fire up the onion browser.I have tried that but of course none of them actually have the Rockefeller paper that he is supposedly referencing and even typing in exact quotes from what he's saying doesn't pull up anything on Google
Lots of buzzwords within that is a red flag to me. Not saying none of it is true, but it's written in such a way imo that gets the CTer juices flowing in me. That and it's a complete takeover of the world in 40 or so pages.I have tried that but of course none of them actually have the Rockefeller paper that he is supposedly referencing and even typing in exact quotes from what he's saying doesn't pull up anything on Google
There is a link to a PDF file in this link.
Rockefeller Foundation Paper published in 2010-‘Lockstep’
I have tried that but of course none of them actually have the Rockefeller paper that he is supposedly referencing and even typing in exact quotes from what he's saying doesn't pull up anything on Google
Can anyone on computer open that PDF and where they link back to the Rockefeller copy and paste the direct link to the Rockefeller paper here so I know I'm giving the original from the Rockefeller website copy and paste the direct link to the Rockefeller paper here so I know I'm giving the original from the Rockefeller website
On mobile I can't do anything but click the hyperlink and I can't tell where it's coming from
Here is a post about it way back when in 2010Hrmmm
So it's them hosting it
anybody find out on the Rockefeller website for somewhere that lets me know it's unadulterated?
Here is a post about it way back when in 2010
But when you click the link, which takes you to the Rockefeller website, it's gone.
I don't think people understand what war games are.Page 18/54
begins the scenario in question. If you view the top introduction you see that this entire document is actually just them running through war game planning for future threats that have almost come true in the past.
There's no advocacy and it's only one scenario of many.
they do not espouse a top-down central government control but instead talk about how it would naturally come from a pandemic followed by civil unrest because it would become too controlling and suppressive of entrepreneurial spirit and other things.
I question the reading comprehension of whoever made the fake Ghana president. This is not an advocacy document
Or just dumb if they told us their true plan.Could be routine could be bad press could be nefarious