false memories happen all the time. Rarely, it results in the death of a child.Your own article states something like it happened 400 times in 20 years, that's not often.
A lot of times, it results in people going to prison who should not.
false memories happen all the time. Rarely, it results in the death of a child.Your own article states something like it happened 400 times in 20 years, that's not often.
sure, but in this case the mechanism is well-understood. It's not a case of rationalizing, it's a case of our best understanding.Science can be used to rationalize a lot of bad things.
What, neglect? Yes, that mechanism is well understood.sure, but in this case the mechanism is well-understood. It's not a case of rationalizing, it's a case of our best understanding.
no, the mechanism of false memories. What you're seeing when a child is left in a car is a very rare manifestation of a worst-case-possible outcome of a neurological blind spot that afflicts every human.What, neglect? Yes, that mechanism is well understood.
False memories sounds like a euphemism to me. Or a an act turned into a condition so we can medicate or find other monetizing elements while voiding responsibility. False memories, you mean someone who is deranged or psychopathic? Newspeak, bah.no, the mechanism of false memories. What you're seeing when a child is left in a car is a very rare manifestation of a worst-case-possible outcome of a neurological blind spot that afflicts every human.
I invite anyone to provide a contravening understanding that either accepts that well-documented truth, or offers sufficient scientific evidence of an alternate theory that includes neglect.
but all that I'm getting is STRONG FEELS about bad parents based on denial of false memories even being a thing.
this is exactly what I mean - it's obvious you didn't bother to read any of the information posted, but you're dismissing it as something it's not because it doesn't align with your emotions.False memories sounds like a euphemism to me. Or a an act turned into a condition so we can medicate or find other monetizing elements while voiding responsibility. False memories, you mean someone who is deranged or psychopathic? Newspeak, bah.
But do you agree that Big Floyd literally meets the definition of a criminal?this is exactly what I mean - it's obvious you didn't bother to read any of the information posted, but you're dismissing it as something it's not because it doesn't align with your emotions.
Yes, but not in way that was relevant to the use of force against him.But do you agree that Big Floyd literally meets the definition of a criminal?
I didn't think anyone said it did, I know I've been consistent that he was a criminal piece of shit, but he shouldn't have been killed that way.Yes, but not in way that was relevant to the use of force against him.
big difference, unless you're saying that criminality is an inherent trait and all criminals should be killed.I didn't think anyone said it did, I know I've been consistent that he was a criminal piece of shit, but he shouldn't have been killedthat way.
I never said that either.big difference, unless you're saying that criminality is an inherent trait and all criminals should be killed.
Yes, I am dismissing it. If something is important to you, you don't forget. You got a hot date at eight tonight? You don't forget. Try and call that girl up and explain about false memory syndrome, hehe... no pussy for you.this is exactly what I mean - it's obvious you didn't bother to read any of the information posted, but you're dismissing it as something it's not because it doesn't align with your emotions.