M
member 1013
Guest
If they aren’t partners in the firm they may fear reprisal from their bosses but any lawyer can turn down any case
Again, not how it works.
Sure is, but please explain
They also might have had the file come across their desk and gone "This seems like horseshit but we should probably look into it. Better safe than sorry."
It was already explained to you in part by Lars. In your opinion is due process and the court system a corner stone of western democracy?
M
member 1013
Guest
They might have also said “YOLO! No ragrets. 420 blaze it.”
they probably didn’t but they might have
Are you saying his statement is outlandish and not based in reality?
Never saw one of my rugby pics so fitting. Lol
M
member 3289
Guest
Omg u r so cool
Forgot the "let's cut the postal service" part
Were there states that extended the deadline right before the election?
I'm very disappointed in you.
For believing people can make their own decisions?
For disregarding the importance of the legal process because in this case the legal process involves something you don't agree with and then reducing the actions of a group of GOP malcontent fund raisers down to something so simple. Even if those lawyers are doing something they agree with because "muh Trump" doxing them is still both morally wrong and against the twitter TOS.
Lawyers turn down cases all the time, it wouldn't be put of the ordinary for that.
Court cases and who lawyers work for a public record, I personally don't agree that what they did is doxing because of this.
And although I disagree with you, as I would regardless the field someone works in, but you're certainly entitled to your opinion.
Which part? Or both?