I kinda buy it. Maybe I'm being naive.That's such a load of bullshit, lol.
It's sounds like they were running into SEC regulation issues, not even truly running out of cash, maybe.I kinda buy it. Maybe I'm being naive.
People are betting on markets; FOREX, stocks, commodities, indices etc. Thebookiesbrokers need to be able to cover the bets. If they can't cover, then they legally can't take the bets.
Makes sense, except in that case they should be halting all trading, not just selling. Which is part of why I call bullshit.I kinda buy it. Maybe I'm being naive.
People are betting on markets; FOREX, stocks, commodities, indices etc. Thebookiesbrokers need to be able to cover the bets. If they can't cover, then they legally can't take the bets.
Well, they can easily cover sell trades. They can't cover any more buy trades.Makes sense, except in that case they should be halting all trading, not just selling. Which is part of why I call bullshit.
I don't see how that's possible. If you bought a stock at $1 they'll let you sell at $300, and claim to have money to cover that, but don't have money to cover buying st $300 and cashing out at $350?Well, they can easily cover sell trades. They can't cover any more buy trades.
I'm torn, tbh.I don't see how that's possible. If you bought a stock at $1 they'll let you sell at $300, and claim to have money to cover that, but don't have money to cover buying st $300 and cashing out at $350?
Does that not make sense to anyone else or am I missing something?
I also think doing your explanation on a new network who's critical of the movement counts a bullshit strike.I'm torn, tbh.
Yea but did you study at Yale? No. Were you close? Maybe, in some ways, but I'll never tell.
Yea but did you study at Yale? No. Were you close? Maybe, in some ways, but I'll never tell.
They are fixing the system.I don't see how that's possible. If you bought a stock at $1 they'll let you sell at $300, and claim to have money to cover that, but don't have money to cover buying st $300 and cashing out at $350?
Does that not make sense to anyone else or am I missing something?
I hate YaleYea but did you study at Yale? No. Were you close? Maybe, in some ways, but I'll never tell.
Trade always requires someone to buy if you want to sell and vice versa. You can't buy anything if no one is selling.I don't see how that's possible. If you bought a stock at $1 they'll let you sell at $300, and claim to have money to cover that, but don't have money to cover buying st $300 and cashing out at $350?
Does that not make sense to anyone else or am I missing something?
Please be nice and don't shit up this thread, I'm only asking once.....Then I'm telling on you
for the record, robinhood in the news last night said their move was not based on any liquidity problems with their companyso robinhood may not have had the funds available to offer more buys on the stock, atleast, in the short term
Then why did they reach out for so many lines of credit? There is fuckery afoot, I think.for the record, robinhood in the news last night said their move was not based on any liquidity problems with their company
So it's just manipulation then.for the record, robinhood in the news last night said their move was not based on any liquidity problems with their company
Supposedly CashApp.Im keen on putting a couple bucks on this Dogecoin. Whats the best platform to use for this?