The solution is obvious. Government must go.
M
member 3289
Guest
He wouldn't have kept it this long if that was the case. It has been very effective at keeping people away.
Unfortunately not the case. It's finna be a real shit show at the border soon, especially because Biden hasn't given border officials time to prepare.
We have war in Europe, chaos at the borders, and skyrocketing inflation.
How the fuck did the definition of pedophilia become a hot topic?
Bruh. Kamala is Border Czar. Relax. She's got this.
And stop saying finna
M
member 3289
Guest
It was clearly an effort to appease the progressive wing of the party. That's worrying.
I support progressive policies but not the ones that relate to border security.
They should have just raised minimum wage or given universal healthcare. I support both those things, plus I'd get to laugh my balls off as you cry about both for the next five years.
I support universal healthcare providing it isn't run by the government. I'd be considering a career change right now if I didn't have to worry about health care. It's bullshit that health insurance is tied to employment.
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
What do you envision?
did you know that government run healthcare is run more efficiently than private healthcare? (theres alot of fluff in the private healthcare process)
katie porter is one of my favorites
View: https://youtu.be/Otnhge3gnMk
M
member 1013
Guest
Dude is always the victim. Fuckin sad. He can’t take responsibility for his own actions, it’s always someone else’s fault. Stop being mean to him!
Fuckery
Easy pickings would be to eliminate the social security cutoff - which is earnings of $147,000
I'm sure you are excited every February when you hit that limit and it looks like you got a raise because your take-home pay increased by 6%
It took 61 seconds for Bezos to hit that limit last year, at which point he fulfilled his social security commitments and didn't pay a single cent more. Leave that 6% turned on for those guys (and everyone else) for the entire year and put those funds toward healthcare. Probably wouldn't cover it - but it would help.
As for the structure of the system - I have no idea. I'll leave that up to you.
Whose government?
M
member 1013
Guest
Who should run it then? “Supply and demand?” Fuck sakes man.
americas
administration costs for private insurance companies is about 17% where as its ariund 1% for medicare
it was authoritarian statism that granted them 1st Class Citizen status.
Anybody but the government. They can fund it - but I don't want them running anything. Everything they touch absolutely sucks.
Is that 17% funding the shortfall from 1% medicare?
Note: I have no idea. Just talking out of my ass.
private healthcare has extra costs such as advertisement costs
in regards to your comment above this, there are some things that the government runs better than private industry. the age old example is the fire department. a for-profit fire department is not as good for society at large
and an argument could be made that a for-profit healthcare system is another example
(especially when the government funds research, and the private industry executives padd their pockets with the profits)
M
member 1013
Guest
How about the postal service?
Fed-Ex and UPS eat their lunch.
Great example. There's zero monetary waste in military spending.
im not sure what the issues with the USPS are
but medicare already exists. and its proven to provide better healthcare at a lower cost
the only thing stopping medicare4all are the bribes that insurance companies pay to corporate republicamd and democrats
M
member 1013
Guest
Yes the United States military is not the technological and logistical master of the world. They can’t run anything! Derp