But they have way less activity, and money flows coming in because of lack of use cases.The best buys have been the 2 I've said, Doge & XRP.
The whales are "fed"eral.
It will crash when they pull a cork, whether nuclear, biological, monetarily, "force majeure", cyber, "terror" or combos.
And like any majority stockholder, they will own it all, like Rothschild & Great Britain after the Napoleanic wars.
But I'm 100% for it, because people seem to only fight for freedom when their money's involved.
You're missing the fucking point as usual.But they have way less activity, and money flows coming in because of lack of use cases.
Neither have been back to the ATH, in dollar terms, when denominated in Bitcoin it’s even worse.
Those might be a good trade in a short term but long term neither have the same fundamentals that keep Bitcoin stronger, more decentralized and higher value.
It’s not even close.
When will “nuclear war, and EMP’s be off the table?” You have an opportunity to secure assets now but you rather wait for the prospect of some hypothetical Armageddon before you do that? Ok. Doesn’t make sense to me but you can do what you want.You're missing the fucking point as usual.
Until nuclear war, EMP's are off the table, and freedom reigns supreme universally, the superior asset class, bitcoin, is not where anyone with a brain should be speculating, and THAT is what is happening pre-peace.
ATH doesn’t really matter for Bitcoin because it’s short term and there will be higher ATHs but the ATHs do matter because they impact the memes, psychology and percentage.ATH doesn't fucking matter, memes, psychology, and percentage matter.
Is it hard to see for you?
DOGE being up 400% in like 2 months?
Or that an auto money making machine buys btc for central banks?
lol sounds salty as fuck. 1st of all, I’ve been telling people to learn about Bitcoin since it was 4K. Not just NOW. You can ignore the thread if it bothers you so much cupcake.Everyone gets bitcoin, and wants it.
But your day-to-day nut-busting over it like everyone should go in NOW is stupid.
I’ve never said to go all in on anything but most people don’t even take the time to understand it and they should.They should go all in when arrests are being made for Pfizer & crooked politicians, and there's peace globally.
Converting real assets into digital wallets pre-war & HODL'ing is pee wee herman level intelligence.
I have Uphold for crypto.DCA to infinity and for the love of God, place it in a cold wallet.
I have Uphold for crypto.
Don't have any bitcoin except for a small amount that was gifted to me - but I do have some XRP in there. It's doubled.
Is Uphold a good place to do this in? I keep reading about wallets but I am fucking clueless on this shit
It will get there.Yawn, wake me when it gets to $200k
Lol there is no shot at the moon with XRP.XRP moonshot
I'm up 180% in less than a year. LMAO.
I know it’s beside the point but felt like addressing this.Personally I think it's some bullshit created by the NSA and satoshi was not real
It’s just better money. Hard money. We price it in dollars because that’s the world reserve currency that most people measure things by today.Question 1)
Bitcoin ain't worth shit without the dollar .
Yes or no ?
Hard to say. It’s a hypothetical situation.Question 2) if bitcoin was the viable currency that all people accepted ( reserve currency) ( hardest currency). What would happen in a recession?
I'll never shit on 180% gains.Lol there is no shot at the moon with XRP.
It’s still down 44% from its all time high back in the ass end of 2017.
That’s 7 years since its last high.
When you measure in Bitcoin terms, at the all time high in 2017 you could have gotten 5,925 XRP for 1 Bitcoin.
Now it would cost 64,900 XRP for 1 Bitcoin.
Your holding an asset that’s losing value massively compared to Bitcoin. Just saying. There are reasons why XRP is a shitcoin.
0I know it’s beside the point but felt like addressing this.
It very well could have been created by someone at the NSA. It was their encryption algorithm that is used but that’s because it’s good encryption, the government still uses that for encryption. Even if it was, it’s open source code. So it really doesn’t matter who created it. Cypherpunks are where the prerequisite ideology of Bitcoin was born. And they would agree with you on the monetary system.
It’s just better money. Hard money. We price it in dollars because that’s the world reserve currency that most people measure things by today.
Bitcoin still has value even if no dollars existed. It would be denominated in something else, in fact it already is. If you lived in another country like Canada it’s already well over 100K CAN.
The properties of Bitcoin is what I believe give it its ultimate value as better money. Settlement world wide on a decentralized network. Censorship resistant digital scarcity, peer to peer transactions and monetary policy that is based on sound money principles is what makes it unique.
Sovereignty with your money like you’ve never had with fiat dollars via a bank.
Bitcoin disintermediates the banks. I think that’s of tremendous value.
Now that being said, what final dollar value it is, I think is still yet to be determined. I don’t think the dollar is going anywhere for a long time. It might not be a physical dollar into the future, shit most of them aren’t physical now anyway. But some form of digital dollar/stablecoin/CBDC will likely always be around. And with further surveillance of all our digital data, I’d rather have my money in something that’s limited supply, decentralized and not under the government’s control or any other single entity.
Hard to say. It’s a hypothetical situation.
If bitcoin were to become a global reserve asset, it would have to herald a new era of fiscal discipline. Unlike fiat, bitcoin's fixed supply imposes natural constraints on government spending, which would in turn force policymakers to operate within the bounds of sound money principles. Recessions might not even happen. At least that is the theory.
Reckless deficit spending, forever wars, and currency debasement would become relics of the fiat past. A bitcoin-based financial system wouldn’t just rein in excess, it would also encourage investment in ultra-long-term, ambitious projects. Bitcoin could be used to underwrite energy resource development and infrastructure revitalization. Freed from the distortions of fiat monetary policy, markets could allocate capital efficiently(not in crypto bullshit or other nonsense tech bubbles), fostering an explosion of productive growth.
Again, this is all speculation in theory. It’s way too hard to say one way or another but I do have a more positive outlook. But ultimately, I don’t have a crystal ball either.
I don't even know how to respond. Read you're own post/s.I know it’s beside the point but felt like addressing this.
It very well could have been created by someone at the NSA. It was their encryption algorithm that is used but that’s because it’s good encryption, the government still uses that for encryption. Even if it was, it’s open source code. So it really doesn’t matter who created it. Cypherpunks are where the prerequisite ideology of Bitcoin was born. And they would agree with you on the monetary system.
It’s just better money. Hard money. We price it in dollars because that’s the world reserve currency that most people measure things by today.
Bitcoin still has value even if no dollars existed. It would be denominated in something else, in fact it already is. If you lived in another country like Canada it’s already well over 100K CAN.
The properties of Bitcoin is what I believe give it its ultimate value as better money. Settlement world wide on a decentralized network. Censorship resistant digital scarcity, peer to peer transactions and monetary policy that is based on sound money principles is what makes it unique.
Sovereignty with your money like you’ve never had with fiat dollars via a bank.
Bitcoin disintermediates the banks. I think that’s of tremendous value.
Now that being said, what final dollar value it is, I think is still yet to be determined. I don’t think the dollar is going anywhere for a long time. It might not be a physical dollar into the future, shit most of them aren’t physical now anyway. But some form of digital dollar/stablecoin/CBDC will likely always be around. And with further surveillance of all our digital data, I’d rather have my money in something that’s limited supply, decentralized and not under the government’s control or any other single entity.
Hard to say. It’s a hypothetical situation.
If bitcoin were to become a global reserve asset, it would have to herald a new era of fiscal discipline. Unlike fiat, bitcoin's fixed supply imposes natural constraints on government spending, which would in turn force policymakers to operate within the bounds of sound money principles. Recessions might not even happen. At least that is the theory.
Reckless deficit spending, forever wars, and currency debasement would become relics of the fiat past. A bitcoin-based financial system wouldn’t just rein in excess, it would also encourage investment in ultra-long-term, ambitious projects. Bitcoin could be used to underwrite energy resource development and infrastructure revitalization. Freed from the distortions of fiat monetary policy, markets could allocate capital efficiently(not in crypto bullshit or other nonsense tech bubbles), fostering an explosion of productive growth.
Again, this is all speculation in theory. It’s way too hard to say one way or another but I do have a more positive outlook. But ultimately, I don’t have a crystal ball either.