I hear you, but in sexual assault cases, criminal charges are not a referendum on guilt or innocence. I agree with you that Pedro completely mishandled it and even a cursory conversation with a lawyer would have had him keeping his mouth shut if they had a case. My sense is he may have sought legal advice and knew they didn't have a criminal case so he went public as his only recourse.Pedro decided to try this in the court of public opinion. So here we are...the public.
Further, entimports is a shitty scraping site that relies on probable robo posting to social media to flood for clicks... So I'm gonna judge that too. But back to the topic...
Once this was entered into defaming BJ in this manner, why isn't it appropriate to then judge? Penn has had his name dragged through the mud, called a drug addict and a violent sexual criminal by Pedro.
Im judging because it's bullshit to lob such accusations without evidence. BJ will now walk tainted by those that caught the original headlines. You know how this goes with any public accusations. The clearing is never as sexy.
It may all be lies, but it's hard to imagine there was enough of a motive for it to go down this way. Most of the people who spoke out contrary to Pedro's story are tight in BJ's circle and we know the cult of personality around him, especially in Hilo. We also had the other journalist who spoke out at the time about being there shortly after it went down.
As far as what he does for a living, TMMAC scrapes content from other sites that we find on social media, albeit through human rather than robotic effort, so what's the difference? I'm not really sure how that makes Pedro a scumbag.