And I conceded that point. How about immunology? Or neurolinguistics?Your skull and soft tissue argument was pwnt.
And I conceded that point. How about immunology? Or neurolinguistics?Your skull and soft tissue argument was pwnt.
No one called you racist except me in jest. Divisive doesn't equal racist homie.The implications that my point of view are racist are so beautifully ironic to me. I really hope I'm not in the minority in seeing this.
Generalisations. Also not proof.And I conceded that point. How about immunology? Or neurolinguistics?
The entire argument implies it. It's an argument of social science, for social science.No one called you racist except me in jest. Divisive doesn't equal racist homie.
huh?? who's thinking along those lines here?. I think it's pretty clear I'm the "white guy" in this argument.
Pretty clear your life experience has led you to be super defensive about it for sure. You've seem as if you have been accused of racism before, and that bothered you. I could be wrong, but that's my hypothesis at this point.The entire argument implies it. It's an argument of social science, for social science.
When met with irrefutable proof that the definition of the word is factually correct and has biological basis, I was indirectly called racist by historical context. I think it's pretty clear I'm the "white guy" in this argument.
The North Sentinelese people are a very specific example of a race which could be defined biologically. Yes or no?Generalisations. Also not proof.
I am. But the racism applies to both sides of the argument.huh?? who's thinking along those lines here?
Putting people in a petri dish is not conclusive evidence to me.The North Sentinelese people are a very specific example of a race which could be defined biologically. Yes or no?
That's because you're using selective reasoning in the context of this argument. You can't just say it doesn't seem like evidence without offering more evidence or a definitive statement to refute.Putting people in a petri dish is not conclusive evidence to me.
Ok, list their biological traits and i will give you my answer.That's because you're using selective reasoning in the context of this argument. You can't just say it doesn't seem like evidence without offering more evidence or a definitive statement to refute.
The collective sum of their physical adaptions to the rock they live on which precludes us from force integrating them with ourselves.Ok, list their biological traits and i will give you my answer.
That sounds quite rapacious.The collective sum of their physical adaptions to the rock they live on which precludes us from force integrating them with ourselves.
They look pretty "black" to me.The collective sum of their physical adaptions to the rock they live on which precludes us from force integrating them with ourselves.
Which is funny, because they seem to share more genetic traits with asians from the research i'm reading.They look pretty "black" to me.
You should have left it at that, cant stop laughing hahaaThe collective sum of their physical adaptions to the rock they live on.
Youve been hinting at that for the last 32 pages brosephI should have left on page one.