Why do people still think Jon Jones cheated intentionally?

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

Tiiimmmaaayyy

First 100 ish
Jan 19, 2015
7,990
9,940
Pretty hard to get past the pic of him being suddenly hyper jacked. Also, hiding under the cage from USADA doesn’t help me believe in him.
 
M

member 3289

Guest
Whats Andy Fosters background?

Is he an expert in anti doping? Is he a sport scientist? A sports psychologist?
He is the Executive Director of the California State Athletic Commission.
 

Grateful Dude

TMMAC Addict
May 30, 2016
8,925
14,261
Whats Andy Fosters background?
Prior to being the Executive Director of the CSAC, he worked for Georgia's athletic commission as Executive Director. He is also a retired MMA fighter, and he also competed in amateur boxing, kickboxing, and sport grappling.
 

Dim

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2017
173
373
Prior to being the Executive Director of the CSAC, he worked for Georgia's athletic commission as Executive Director. He is also a retired MMA fighter, and he also competed in amateur boxing, kickboxing, and sport grappling.
so hes an ex ped user then? :D
 

Rum

Active Member
Sep 7, 2015
32
57
Remember that time he popped for 2 banned substances and the tainted product he bought in as an "explanation" had 3 banned substances in it, one of which somehow didn't show up in his system?

That was kind of weird.
 
M

member 3289

Guest
Remember that time he popped for 2 banned substances and the tainted product he bought in as an "explanation" had 3 banned substances in it, one of which somehow didn't show up in his system?

That was kind of weird.
No, this did not happen.
 

MovinOn

Canis lupus familiaris
Jan 3, 2018
1,825
6,195
Ahem! Nothing to see here...


Jon Jones has opted not to enroll with the Voluntary Anti-Doping Agency (VADA).

At a California State Athletic Commission (CSAC) hearing last week, Jones was granted his license to fight back following a doping suspension. During the hearing, one of the commissioners, Martha Shen-Urquidez, proposed to Jones that if he wanted to completely clear his name, he could join the VADA program. Jones gets tested and adjudicated by USADA, the UFC’s anti-doping partner, as well as athletic commissions. VADA has no financial tie to the UFC.

Jones and his attorney Howard Jacobs agreed in principle in the moment to enroll with VADA. But Jacobs confirmed with MMA Fighting on Wednesday that “after investigating” what the VADA program would entail, Jones and his team decided to “decline” the proposal. MMAjunkie was the first to report the news.

“It’s complicated,” Jacobs said. “To say refused is the wrong word. There were issues with the proposal. We asked questions and were unable to fully resolve it.”

Jon Jones’ team declines CSAC proposal to enroll in VADA


I mean, if you're REALLY clean, why be unwilling to prove it with an additional testing agency since USADA is looked upon with suspicion by practically everyone these days.
 
M

member 3289

Guest
Ahem! Nothing to see here...


Jon Jones has opted not to enroll with the Voluntary Anti-Doping Agency (VADA).

At a California State Athletic Commission (CSAC) hearing last week, Jones was granted his license to fight back following a doping suspension. During the hearing, one of the commissioners, Martha Shen-Urquidez, proposed to Jones that if he wanted to completely clear his name, he could join the VADA program. Jones gets tested and adjudicated by USADA, the UFC’s anti-doping partner, as well as athletic commissions. VADA has no financial tie to the UFC.

Jones and his attorney Howard Jacobs agreed in principle in the moment to enroll with VADA. But Jacobs confirmed with MMA Fighting on Wednesday that “after investigating” what the VADA program would entail, Jones and his team decided to “decline” the proposal. MMAjunkie was the first to report the news.

“It’s complicated,” Jacobs said. “To say refused is the wrong word. There were issues with the proposal. We asked questions and were unable to fully resolve it.”

Jon Jones’ team declines CSAC proposal to enroll in VADA


I mean, if you're REALLY clean, why be unwilling to prove it with an additional testing agency since USADA is looked upon with suspicion by practically everyone these days.
This deserves to be a new thread, my man.
 

Andrewsimar Palhardass

Women, dinosaurs, and the violence of the octagon.
Jan 8, 2016
5,234
6,822
Ahem! Nothing to see here...


Jon Jones has opted not to enroll with the Voluntary Anti-Doping Agency (VADA).

At a California State Athletic Commission (CSAC) hearing last week, Jones was granted his license to fight back following a doping suspension. During the hearing, one of the commissioners, Martha Shen-Urquidez, proposed to Jones that if he wanted to completely clear his name, he could join the VADA program. Jones gets tested and adjudicated by USADA, the UFC’s anti-doping partner, as well as athletic commissions. VADA has no financial tie to the UFC.

Jones and his attorney Howard Jacobs agreed in principle in the moment to enroll with VADA. But Jacobs confirmed with MMA Fighting on Wednesday that “after investigating” what the VADA program would entail, Jones and his team decided to “decline” the proposal. MMAjunkie was the first to report the news.

“It’s complicated,” Jacobs said. “To say refused is the wrong word. There were issues with the proposal. We asked questions and were unable to fully resolve it.”

Jon Jones’ team declines CSAC proposal to enroll in VADA


I mean, if you're REALLY clean, why be unwilling to prove it with an additional testing agency since USADA is looked upon with suspicion by practically everyone these days.
If you were under the impression that you have falsely had your name run through the mud twice by an antidoping agency, why would you think it would be a good idea to invite someone else's program on top of yours? I am not saying that Jones is innocent or even that he thinks he is innocent. I am saying that there is a clear path to why they wouldn't want to do this if he actually never intentionally cheated. This doesn't help the case for dissenters.