Jones still testing positive Into January

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

D241

Banned
Jan 14, 2015
4,384
4,741
If Jon Jones' girlfriend had the same trace amounts of picograms of SEMEN in her system, would he play it off as he wants us to play this off?
 

Enock-O-Lypse Now!

Underneath Denver International Airport
Jun 19, 2016
11,777
19,661
Well yeah!

Didn’t you hear Jon at the Presser? This stuff could potentially be in his system for 7 years ...
 

Enock-O-Lypse Now!

Underneath Denver International Airport
Jun 19, 2016
11,777
19,661
Because gov't officials are corrupt and the commissions that are comprised of them are laughable dogshit?
Lol you and your conspiracies ...a true American would never accuse Governement Officials of corruption, that is simply preposterous.
 
Nov 21, 2015
9,139
12,449


Jon Jones still had a long-term steroid metabolite in his system as of early January.

The UFC light heavyweight champion had ultra trace amounts of the steroid oral Turinabol (4-chloro-18-nor-17β-hydroxymethyl,17α-methyl-5α-androst-13-en-3α-ol (M3) or DHCMT) in drug-test results stemming from samples collected Jan. 6 and Jan. 7, the California State Athletic Commission (CSAC) confirmed with MMA Fighting on Friday.

These results were first mentioned Tuesday at Jones’ Nevada Athletic Commission (NAC) licensing hearing. The drug tests were administered by the Voluntary Anti-Doping Agency (VADA) and reported to CSAC. The results came back Monday, according to CSAC executive officer Andy Foster, and the NAC had them in time for the Tuesday hearing.

At that hearing, Jones was granted a conditional, one-fight license to defend his title against Anthony Smith at UFC 235 on March 2 in Las Vegas. As part of that licensing, Jones will have to be drug tested at least twice monthly by the Nevada commission, in addition to continuing testing done by VADA and USADA, the UFC’s anti-doping partner.

Foster made it clear Friday that the Jan. 6 and 7 results do not constitute a new doping violation. As has been the case with previous trace amounts of the M3 metabolite of DHCMT found in Jones’ system, scientists have testified that this is likely the same long-term metabolite that Jones was already suspended 15 months for after a July 2017 positive drug test.

Like in those previous abnormal results, there were no parent compounds or short- or medium-term metabolites found in Jones — just the long-term M3 metabolite, which Dr. Daniel Eichner, the lab director at WADA-accredited SMRTL in Salt Lake City, testified Tuesday does not likely give Jones any performance-enhancing benefits. Eichner has also stated in a public hearing and in written statements that there is no evidence Jones re-administered a prohibited substance going back to that July 2017 positive.

For a ton more information click the link.

Jon Jones abnormal drug-test results continue into January, no new doping violation filed
Brendan Schaub... "Jon Jones Should Not Be Fighting. Per the rules you
cannot compete until whatever you flagged for is out of your system"


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IORRLBXnbTU
 

KWingJitsu

ยาเม็ดสีแดงหรือสีฟ้ายา?
Nov 15, 2015
10,311
12,758
No performance-enhancing benefit. The experts have already stated this.

No short- or medium-term metabolites. Only the long-term one (proof he hasn't ingested anything in the last 6 months or likely more).

The previous studies on the M3 metabolite are inadequate, as the experts have also said.

Are you gayboys gonna make a thread every time for this non-issue?

Smfh...
Though I am far from an expert on steroid use, I think that as long as he keeps on testing "positive" for the long-term metabolite, it actually proves that he hasn't ingested anything new sine the long-term turinabol was found in his system. So the positive test actually proves what they all said: Old traces, no new ingestion and it could keep showing up on tests for years. This is sounding like its true, which I didn't believe the first time I heard it.
 
1

1031

Guest
^
I can just see that playing out in court somewhere:
Your honour, my client did not drink and drive! He still had alcohol in his system from the last time he got drunk, which was on NYE!