Chiesa: Sanchez ‘touched my butthole’ at UFC 239

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
Wild

Wild

Zi Nazi
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
85,153
123,521


At first glance, Michael Chiesa put on a dominant performance over Diego Sanchez at UFC 239, but the truth is he was put in a very compromising position.

Chiesa, 31, recently shared how Sanchez, 37, caught him with an unexpected attack in their welterweight clash. “I could feel he was butt-dragging me, and that’s whatever, but all of a sudden — I don’t know if he intentionally did it — but he literally, his fingers touched my butthole,” Chiesa recently told ESPN’s Ariel Helwani.


Michael Chiesa: Diego Sanchez’s ‘fingers touched my butthole’ at UFC 239
 
Wild

Wild

Zi Nazi
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
85,153
123,521
Absolutely nothing wrong with a mid-fight oil check as far as I’m concerned. Frankly, instead of taking exception to it, Chiesa should have offered a thank you.
 
jason73

jason73

Yuri Bezmenov was right
First 100
Jan 15, 2015
72,937
134,361


he probably only got it in to the first knuckle.its not like he finger blasted him. cheisa needs to stop being homophobic
 
jimmy boogaloo

jimmy boogaloo

General Links/Your Account
Nov 15, 2017
4,130
4,267
ha yeah I watched that, despite thinking that i would not get on with Michael, butt it appears Diego is worse

Wild said:
Absolutely nothing wrong with a mid-fight oil check as far as I’m concerned. Frankly, instead of taking exception to it, Chiesa should have offered a thank you.
Click to expand...
and he should also have offered to passionately lick Diego's fingers
 
T

Tuc Ouiner

Posting Machine
May 19, 2016
1,841
1,479
always wondered why they called him Dirty Sanchez...……… always suspected he was a dirt farmer just off the Hershey highway masquerading as an mma baddass when in fact he was a former turd burglar breaking into homes and...…………………. see above
 
WoodenPupa

WoodenPupa

Member
Feb 14, 2015
2,920
3,565
I believe Diego's lawyer would argue his client touched a garment (shorts) which touched another garment (underwear) which then made incidental frictive contact with the external portion of the plaintiff's sphincter whose pulsations must be recognized and furthermore should not be understood as merely incidental but instead raise the question of entrapment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom