General Epstein "commits suicide"

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

KWingJitsu

ยาเม็ดสีแดงหรือสีฟ้ายา?
Nov 15, 2015
10,311
12,758
all good man, makes sense...I admit here and now that a portion of what I post the last 18 months or so is not my sincere 100% thoughts or beliefs

My days about complaining about trolling are gone, it is obviously acceptable so I just join in at times...So yes, I no longer am always sincere because it was pointless to be one of the only folks posting my true thoughts and opinions just to be made fun of or have those used to troll me...I do in fact "wear that mask" at times now.

You and others troll lefties about stuff admittedly...I troll stark anti-CT folks at times.

Insults are the only thing I currently care about.

I love the forum and I am a very nice person to converse with or hang out with in real life...I would grab a beer/coffee with any of ya and show you around my area if asked.

Have a good day sir
This is the most sophisticated troll job this site has ever seen - reverse psychology at it's finest.













Just kidding, fren. Post touched me in the feels. :cheers:
 

Sheepdog

Protecting America from excessive stool loitering
Dec 1, 2015
8,912
14,237
It's weird being part of the same species that can simultaneously send people to the Moon while also claiming the whole thing was faked by lizard people.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,096
The modernization of Smith Mundt Act legalized propaganda against the people by the media. Operation Mockingbird had 40 agents in the MSM at the time of JFK's assassination and I highly doubt that type of operation has not grown exponentially since then.
Please show me where people theorized these things were going on, a large public denial was taking place, and then those conspiring were exposed by those theorizing it.

Again, CT has a poor track record of theorizing and being right about...well anything.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,096
The "frozen envelope theory" suggests that the National Basketball Association rigged its 1985 draft lottery so that Patrick Ewing would join the New York Knicks. Theorists claim that a lottery envelope was chilled so that it could be identified by touch



Maybe my new favorite conspiracy theory lol
 

gangsterkathryn

저승사자
Oct 20, 2015
17,319
20,573
The "frozen envelope theory" suggests that the National Basketball Association rigged its 1985 draft lottery so that Patrick Ewing would join the New York Knicks. Theorists claim that a lottery envelope was chilled so that it could be identified by touch



Maybe my new favorite conspiracy theory lol
Avril is still my favorite.
 
M

member 3289

Guest
You might be on to something here. Oxygen causes iron to rust and we have iron in our blood. Rust build up in out blood stream for 80 years would kill anyone. Damn government and their oxygen. No wonder trees live longer.
That explains why autocrats like Bolsonaro and Trump are global warming skeptics - they want to kill all those poisonous trees!!!

This is literally the level of intelligence that starts 99% of the conspiracy theories out there
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,096
You might be on to something here. Oxygen causes iron to rust and we have iron in our blood. Rust build up in out blood stream for 80 years would kill anyone. Damn government and their oxygen. No wonder trees live longer.










Big Pharma and Corporations are conspiring to expose us to oxygen regularly, even higher than we currently rust at!




Sometimes with devastating results!



Everytime there's a school shooter I think, "Was he breathing oxygen?" So far I'm 100% correct and this is the story no one is talking about!

We've known for years!
SCIENCE WATCH; The Dark Side of Oxygen

But they have pumping this into our communities for years!



They did experiments on us with oxygen in the military





 

RaginCajun

The Reigning Undisputed Monsters Tournament Champ
Oct 25, 2015
36,981
93,895
Please show me where people theorized these things were going on, a large public denial was taking place, and then those conspiring were exposed by those theorizing it.

Again, CT has a poor track record of theorizing and being right about...well anything.
Trump retweets Epstein conspiracy theory, claiming Clinton connection

The president retweeted a conspiracy theory Saturday that suggested a connection between former President Bill Clinton and the death of the wealthy financier and accused sex trafficker.
 

Sheepdog

Protecting America from excessive stool loitering
Dec 1, 2015
8,912
14,237
Please show me where people theorized these things were going on, a large public denial was taking place, and then those conspiring were exposed by those theorizing it.

Again, CT has a poor track record of theorizing and being right about...well anything.
I never thought I'd be defending 'conspiracy theories' in this this retard-infested thread but being overly reactionary against theories that challenge official narratives is the other side of the dipshit coin (I'm not saying you're doing that). It's the definition of an absence of critical thinking.

Human history is littered with those in power spreading false narratives and suppressing challenges to these narratives by labeling them as conspiracy theories. And, those in power often spread conspiracy theories themselves - let's just Godwin this point and bring up the Nazis for simplicity.

One man's conspiracy theory can be another man's propaganda can be another man's truth.

To say that 'conspiracy theories' have a poor track record is true-ish - but it uses the circular reasoning that any of the countless kooky sounding 'conspiracies' (MK Ultra sounds as crazy as you get and yet it's true) that were actually true are no longer conspiracy theories by virtue of turning out to be true. It doesn't mean at one point they weren't or couldn't have been labeled 'conspiracy theories'. Conspiracy theories have proven true plenty of times, quite simply, depending on how we label them and who gets to label them.

So let's bring this back to Epstein. Dipshits blaming Clinton, Trump or the Jews without any evidence are crazy nuts. A rational person would accept that he probably killed himself, but maintain a healthy skepticism considering the circumstances, and wait to see the evidence. Someone uncritically dismissing even the possibility of foul play at this juncture - because we know so little - is no better than the crazy nut.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,096
I never thought I'd be defending 'conspiracy theories' in this this retard-infested thread but being overly reactionary against theories that challenge official narratives is the other side of the dipshit coin (I'm not saying you're doing that). It's the definition of an absence of critical thinking.

Human history is littered with those in power spreading false narratives and suppressing challenges to these narratives by labeling them as conspiracy theories. And, those in power often spread conspiracy theories themselves - let's just Godwin this point and bring up the Nazis for simplicity.

One man's conspiracy theory can be another man's propaganda can be another man's truth.

To say that 'conspiracy theories' have a poor track record is true-ish - but it uses the circular reasoning that any of the countless kooky sounding 'conspiracies' (MK Ultra sounds as crazy as you get and yet it's true) that were actually true are no longer conspiracy theories by virtue of turning out to be true. It doesn't mean at one point they weren't or couldn't have been labeled 'conspiracy theories'. Conspiracy theories have proven true plenty of times, quite simply, depending on how we label them and who gets to label them.

So let's bring this back to Epstein. Dipshits blaming Clinton, Trump or the Jews without any evidence are crazy nuts. A rational person would accept that he probably killed himself, but maintain a healthy skepticism considering the circumstances, and wait to see the evidence. Someone uncritically dismissing even the possibility of foul play at this juncture - because we know so little - is no better than the crazy nut.

No one is being overly reactionary.
Taking a story, using investigation to validate that story is normal. It's what journalists do...You know, the MSM journalists that CT rails against.
CT doesn't theorize and expose. It tilts into the wind at predefined end points instead of working out from the known facts. It's starting investigation from finish instead of start. That's my point. The entirety of the methodology of the community is flawed and the outcomes prove it I think. I can find no google search showing me some CT wins. I looked.
Referencing previous bad behavior only backs the CT community if the CT community theorized it and then was proven right. But that doesn't happen.

The fact that official narratives have been countered in a methodical process of investigation and uncovering suggests only that things are pretty straight forward. Humans are flawed. Investigations take time and are done piecemeal. And news reporters aren't all out to pull the wool over your eyes. They have the best track records of exposing corruption. And in the end, the biggest outcomes are typically WHY an action happened not the WHAT. We lie about why we are somewhere doing something. We don't get away with faking an entire moon landing, etc. The CT community invents the WHAT and then never proves it.

The cover of, "Are you saying there's never been conspiracies??!?!" is deflection. All I want is the CT methodology and community to show me their wins. I can show other methodology having outcomes of truth without fantasy.

So let's bring this back to Epstein. Dipshits blaming Clinton, Trump or the Jews without any evidence are crazy nuts. A rational person would accept that he probably killed himself, but maintain a healthy skepticism considering the circumstances, and wait to see the evidence. Someone uncritically dismissing even the possibility of foul play at this juncture - because we know so little - is no better than the crazy nut.
No one has done anything of the sort. I'm the only one in the thread working through public data to see if the story fits. BOP investigations are ongoing. There are cameras in the cell 24 hours (See my links) that will have to be released to close the story or at least congressionally reviewed.
A normal reaction is what is occurring. An investigation into the custody of the prisoner and how this could happen that involves government and MSM of all people. That would have to find something strikingly out of the ordinary to move from incompetence to malfeasance.

I simple am asking the CT community to show me their methodology is a validated one. Because references to cold war programs to push positive american messages against the soviets around the world don't really convince me we faked the moon landings or WTC was done by thermite.
 

Never_Rolled

First 10,000
Dec 17, 2018
5,798
6,349
I never thought I'd be defending 'conspiracy theories' in this this retard-infested thread but being overly reactionary against theories that challenge official narratives is the other side of the dipshit coin (I'm not saying you're doing that). It's the definition of an absence of critical thinking.

Human history is littered with those in power spreading false narratives and suppressing challenges to these narratives by labeling them as conspiracy theories. And, those in power often spread conspiracy theories themselves - let's just Godwin this point and bring up the Nazis for simplicity.

One man's conspiracy theory can be another man's propaganda can be another man's truth.

To say that 'conspiracy theories' have a poor track record is true-ish - but it uses the circular reasoning that any of the countless kooky sounding 'conspiracies' (MK Ultra sounds as crazy as you get and yet it's true) that were actually true are no longer conspiracy theories by virtue of turning out to be true. It doesn't mean at one point they weren't or couldn't have been labeled 'conspiracy theories'. Conspiracy theories have proven true plenty of times, quite simply, depending on how we label them and who gets to label them.

So let's bring this back to Epstein. Dipshits blaming Clinton, Trump or the Jews without any evidence are crazy nuts. A rational person would accept that he probably killed himself, but maintain a healthy skepticism considering the circumstances, and wait to see the evidence. Someone uncritically dismissing even the possibility of foul play at this juncture - because we know so little - is no better than the crazy nut.
You don’t kneed evidence when it’s always the Jews!
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,746
71,626
The "frozen envelope theory" suggests that the National Basketball Association rigged its 1985 draft lottery so that Patrick Ewing would join the New York Knicks. Theorists claim that a lottery envelope was chilled so that it could be identified by touch



Maybe my new favorite conspiracy theory lol
It is a good one.
The NBA has a few of those very coincidental lottery outcomes.