You didnt answer my questionI've said this before the wealthy, traveled, position in society many times are approached. This isn't rare. They have inside access that would be of benefit to agencies with acronyms. All countries do this. They would be committing malpractice if they didn't tap these resources. Some of these people end up being scoundrels. Carter Page recently admitted to being an asset.
Edit to say I'm not saying Carter Page was a scoundrel.
So you think Epstein was just a cia operative?Usually the CIA.
No idea. I’m saying if anything he may have been an asset. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was. It doesn’t mean anything though. It just means you pass on info on they made be interested in. It doesn’t mean quid pro quo.So you think Epstein was just a cia operative?
How is it different?Big difference between being an Operative and being run as an agent who has access.
If there was no qpq then how did he get 13 months for raping multiple kids and why did acosta say he was an Intel asset?No idea. I’m saying if anything he may have been an asset. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was. It doesn’t mean anything though. It just means you pass on info on they made be interested in. It doesn’t mean quid pro quo.
it means he is basically a snitchNo idea. I’m saying if anything he may have been an asset. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was. It doesn’t mean anything though. It just means you pass on info on they made be interested in. It doesn’t mean quid pro quo.
Our Gov. called for an investigation. I am more then happy to see what the results are. I have no idea what this guy was doing. I’m not even sure how he earned his fortune.If there was no qpq then how did he get 13 months for raping multiple kids and why did acosta say he was an Intel asset?
Do you think he could have been another countries operative?
I think I read somewhere he made his fortune as a "before" picture model.Our Gov. called for an investigation. I am more then happy to see what the results are. I have no idea what this guy was doing. I’m not even sure how he earned his fortune.
Well, one is the person who works for an agency running sources, the other is a person who does not, and has access and an inclination to share that information, for whatever reason foul or fair, who is being run by the operative. 'Working' for an agency does not mean an employee as such. (Although it might lol)How is it different?