General 9/11...18 years on

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,541
71,465
flight 93 was just part of the event

no reason to focus on that

RIP
 

KWingJitsu

ยาเม็ดสีแดงหรือสีฟ้ายา?
Nov 15, 2015
10,311
12,758
You can rainbow me all you want homie, but the fact that you rainbowed me 3 seconds after I posted a 4 minute video, shows:
- You didn't watch the video
- You have no intent of understanding the science behind the collapse - which is fully explained in the video.

But You just rainbow on, Rambo John J @Outlaw Shit
 

b00ts

pews&vrooms
Amateur Fighter
Oct 21, 2015
5,599
8,635
I still can't figure out what the people on the other 3 flights were doing. If I'm on a plane getting hijacked by middle eastern dudes with box cutters, I'm fighting. I would assume other able-bodied men and women would join in.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,095
I still can't figure out what the people on the other 3 flights were doing. If I'm on a plane getting hijacked by middle eastern dudes with box cutters, I'm fighting. I would assume other able-bodied men and women would join in.

You think that due to retrospection.
Before 9/11 you could sit tight and negotiations could happen sometimes and you go home safe.
Everybody would fight now. It's not cliche to say it was a different time.
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,541
71,465
Whose goal post are you talking about? I never spoke of 93 and what I think happened to it, but you attribute a previous question to my beliefs or hypothesis.
You surely aren't painting anyone with questions about that event, with a broad brush to dismiss any specific topics or questions...that would be far below your comprehension

I think flight 93 not where one would look if they wanted to examine what went on that day with a skeptical eye...so it is not my goalpost that is changing at all...Many other much more worthy topics if one is looking for problems with the official narrative.

RIP
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,095
Whose goal post are you talking about? I never spoke of 93 and what I think happened to it, but you attribute a previous question to my beliefs or hypothesis.
Then why are you telling the two of us what to talk/not talk about?
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,541
71,465
Last edited:

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,541
71,465
Then why are you telling the two of us what to talk/not talk about?
Didn't mean it that way
please debunk whatever it is your are debunking
just saying the meat of the issue lies elsewhere
 

KWingJitsu

ยาเม็ดสีแดงหรือสีฟ้ายา?
Nov 15, 2015
10,311
12,758
Hope your not to closed minded on the case to learn, this is recent news
The Official Story of the Collapse of WTC Building 7 Lies in Ruins
I am not closed minded to anything... which is why I relied on the actual scientific research and results I posted in the video.
Your article says:

The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”

See, I actually read it!
Now I recommend you watch the video I posted, because Newsflash... the conclusion in your article is not at odds with the video explanation I posted. It shows how the columns failed simultaneously.

There's another computer generated simulation video I saw - I'll need to find it.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,095
But I still have trouble understanding what happened to building 7.

It burnt for 12 hours with a 20 story hole in the side of it and no sprinkler system due to water outages.






Those with an agenda show you only one side of the tower over and over.

No evidence will be enough.

Even other buildings burning and collapsing around the world, now must also be controlled demolitons lol...


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVqXuXF8baw



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boCLAmst1Ig
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,541
71,465
I am not closed minded to anything... which is why I relied on the actual scientific research and results I posted in the video.
Your article says:

The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”

See, I actually read it!
Now I recommend you watch the video I posted, because Newsflash... the conclusion in your article is not at odds with the video explanation I posted. It shows how the columns failed simultaneously.

There's another computer generated simulation video I saw - I'll need to find it.
difference is one of the studies claims fire caused it(NIST)
other study claims fire did not cause it

View: https://youtu.be/-ZlmHvd_RZU?t=30
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,541
71,465

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,541
71,465
always a fun video
but
how does that explain a completely uniform collapse of all columns when fire was not uniform throughout the structure?
how does it explain collapse into its footprint?
That was nearly free fall speed

If you are getting your science from that dude, ^^^ by all means enjoy.
I will take the science of a University and actual Architects and Engineers over his.