General 9/11...18 years on

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

tang

top korean roofer
Oct 21, 2015
9,398
12,402
You can rainbow me all you want homie, but the fact that you rainbowed me 3 seconds after I posted a 4 minute video, shows:
- You didn't watch the video
- You have no intent of understanding the science behind the collapse - which is fully explained in the video.

But You just rainbow on, Rambo John J @Outlaw Shit
have you maybe ever thought of the possibility that Rambo John J @Outlaw Shit maybe already saw this video or already knows what worthless information you're about shove down his throat?
 

tang

top korean roofer
Oct 21, 2015
9,398
12,402
this video is funny, they claim one on the right is the real one(more choppy one with glitches and pixel breaks) and the one on the left (one that looks unedited and smooth) is supposed to be fake
.
 
Last edited:
M

member 3289

Guest
have you maybe ever thought of the possibility that Rambo John J @Outlaw Shit maybe already saw this video or already knows what worthless information you're about shove down his throat?
Not a chance in hell. He's just an ignorant person without a formal education
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,542
71,465
https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1512-20490-8452/403_apc.pdf
"The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires."

My point is this much needed investigation was not done by NIST...therefore, there has been no real investigation.

Sulfur bro, look into it
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,095
https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1512-20490-8452/403_apc.pdf
"The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires."

My point is this investigation was not done by NIST...therefore there has been no real investigation.

No reason given for the sulfur...other than...

I asked how you knew what was molten steel. This doesn't explain that
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,095
My point is this much needed investigation was not done by NIST...therefore, there has been no real investigation.

Sulfur bro, look into it
You said nist was untrustworthy so why do they need to do it?
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,542
71,465
You keep changing your sulphur stuff. What's your point?
Point is, I ain't buying the official narrative.
I have heard a lot of science on the controlled demo hypothesis, and I would like a legit investigation of the evidence that remains.

I changed my sulfur sentence, because no point going there if you aren't open to discussing thermite or thermate.
Building 7 is textbook perfect demolition...that is where it starts, and if that can't be discussed then it is agree to disagree


so we must agree to disagree on this topic.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,095
I changed my sulfur sentence, because no point going there if you aren't open to discussing thermite or thermate.

How could those corroded beams be from thermite when their temperatures clearly never got hot enough to indicate anything other than a fire?

All I asked was how you knew that was molten steel and you posted this stuff.
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,542
71,465
How could those corroded beams be from thermite when their temperatures clearly never got hot enough to indicate anything other than a fire?

All I asked was how you knew that was molten steel and you posted this stuff.
OK you got me
Building 7 fell from office fires, all the beams just gave out from a fire on a few parts of the building
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,095
OK you got me
Building 7 fell from office fires, all the beams just gave out from a fire on a few parts of the building

That doesn't have anything to do with the molten steel. I asked a simple question about how one can identify an alloy from a video.

I have also poster two other burning buildings that fall in similar fashion so maybe they are all blown up...but I didn't ask about that. Just how the alloy is identified as molten steel.
 

Rambo John J

Eats things that would make a Billy Goat Puke
First 100
Jan 17, 2015
71,542
71,465
That doesn't have anything to do with the molten steel. I asked a simple question about how one can identify an alloy from a video.

I have also poster two other burning buildings that fall in similar fashion so maybe they are all blown up...but I didn't ask about that. Just how the alloy is identified as molten steel.
I cannot identify that myself
you know this, I know this

amended...
pools of molten metal were there for days after...not steel necessarily but metal or alloy of some kind

IMO those other buildings do not fall like the one in the Gif above
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,095
I cannot identify that myself
you know this, I know this
Maybe you have evidence.

You said...

lots of footage and reports of molten steel for more than a week after the event

The FEMA report documented it
So how can footage tell? Where's the footage (I was okay just assuming the video above was some of it )?
Where are the reports?

And as I linked, the FEMA report does NOT document molten steel. Says it didn't melt. Wasn't hot enough.