Monkey was apparently on pills and also drinking wineEspecially chimpanzees. I remember a lady had a chimp for 20 years then one day it ate her nose and poked her eyeballs out.
You swore allegiance to the big daddy Trump!You heard cunt
I agree but it can be done on a microscalethere's not enough acreage in the world for everyone to live that way. There's about 4 billion acres of arable land in the world, nobody can grown enough food to feed a person on 2/3 of an acre without making a massive carbon/water footprint.
you mean that wealthy (compared to world average) people can do it as a hollow virtue-signal?I agree but it can be done on a microscale
A lot of vegans are sincere but some are nauseous virtue signalersyou mean that wealthy (compared to world average) people can do it as a hollow virtue-signal?
yes, that's true.
regardless of their sincerity, they consider it a virtuous lifestyle because of the health virtues or moral virtues of vegetarianism.A lot of vegans are sincere but some are nauseous virtue signalers
Killing less sentient beings is more moral and generally the health benefits are betterregardless of their sincerity, they consider it a virtuous lifestyle because of the health virtues or moral virtues of vegetarianism.
they're wrong.
That's the one with Arnold right I've actually never seen it cuz I heard it wasn't any good but I'll have to check it outLast Action Hero
I've never read a documented single-source health benefit of a vegetarian lifestyle.Killing less sentient beings is more moral and generally the health benefits are better
use ignore featurePathetic threads are getting pathetic.
Veganism is generally associated with a higher risk of death to sentient beings. I pointed that out earlier in the thread.Killing less sentient beings is more moral and generally the health benefits are better
Have u seen the Adventist study, blue zone, and the China study? Vegan and vegetarian are different...and I dont Advocate a vegan diet but a plant-based diet that's low in meat as optimalI've never read a documented single-source health benefit of a vegetarian lifestyle.
do you mean that killing fewer sentient beings is 'more' moral or that the less-sentient a being is the less immoral it is to kill it?
or both?
And I agreed with you and pointed out that an individual farmer who is vegan could kill less than a vegan who buys commercialVeganism is generally associated with a higher risk of death to sentient beings. I pointed that out earlier in the thread.
how many acres does a vegan farmer need for subsistence farming?And I agreed with you and pointed out that an individual farmer who is vegan could kill less than a vegan who buys commercial
So do you mean in the sense of one person feeding just themselves?And I agreed with you and pointed out that an individual farmer who is vegan could kill less than a vegan who buys commercial