It's kind of nice to see the tables turned on these whackos.
Since his identity has been figured out, she should press charges.
It's kind of nice to see the tables turned on these whackos.
Wait. This faggit worked at a hair salon? Seriously?Word is he got fired by the hair salon he worked at.
Ethics and actions seldom have consistency in general. Why politicize something so general?This is what I truly detest about so many of the leftists I've seen or met, their ethics truly have no consistency and it's visible in how they conduct and express themselves through and through.
People are fucking alarmists and reactionaries at heart, news should deal with facts only and offer no opinions. Opinions should be on totally separate programming, maybe that would bring an ebb to the ridiculous extent we westerners are conducting ourselves in disagreement.
mgtowIt's a sad state of affairs when a "man" can strike a woman in public and not be immediately beaten into a coma by every male in the near vicinity. That's supposed to be something that goes beyond all politics.
They prefer "testosterone challenged"Wait. This faggit worked at a hair salon? Seriously?
Haircut alone should have him stoned am I right @KWingJitsu8 counts of assault, 7 counts of mischief. Ha ha
What the fuck counts as a count of misceif? Leaving banana skins on the ground for people to slip on?8 counts of assault, 7 counts of mischief. Ha ha
It also covers dropping an anvil on someone's head, painting a tunnel on the side of a rock and having someone run into it, and handing someone a cigar that is actually a stick of dynamite. aka the Bugs Bunny act of 1955What the fuck counts as a count of misceif? Leaving banana skins on the ground for people to slip on?
You Cindy been following me?It also covers dropping an anvil on someone's head, painting a tunnel on the side of a rock and having someone run into it, and handing someone a cigar that is actually a stick of dynamite. aka the Bugs Bunny act of 1955
Politicize?Ethics and actions seldom have consistency in general. Why politicize something so general?
People are not reactionaries or alarmists at heart otherwise society would be impossible. Emotions are one part of our experience and rationalism doesn't cause us to suppress that in any meaningful way, it just changes where we are on the continuum.
The world is actually more subdued than it has been at any point in history, but we just document it more assiduously so it seems more hectic.
Dude, he called you a nazi, you’ve got to get pickmans knife. You have to be nice andsmilePoliticize?
You're telling me I've politicized what I've observed in relation to an altercation over an obvious political issue?
We can agree to disagree with regard everthing quoted.
He what???Dude, he called you a nazi, you’ve got to get pickmans knife. You have to be nice andsmile
He what???
That reminds me of the other day; a woman said "excuse me" when she walked by and my friend told me she was calling me a sexual predator, I ran up to her and demanded an apology. She played dumb....but I wasn't having it!
You mean well. I am sure most people do, regardless of political leanings.So you're saying I write too much, eh...that's harsh.
So now you're calling me an unhinged reactionary socialist?You mean well. I am sure most people do, regardless of political leanings.
Absolutely not. I think you’re a latent homosexual. Seek out an opinion treatment fagsoidSo now you're calling me an unhinged reactionary socialist?
I'm going to have to walk that one off.Absolutely not. I think you’re a latent homosexual. Seek out an opinion treatment fagsoid