General $100 fine for masturbation in Texas

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

Onetrickpony

Stay gold
Nov 21, 2016
14,042
32,308
Looks like Splinty @Splinty is going to have to sell the yacht.



A Texas politician has filed legislation that would see men fined $100 (£82) for masturbating unless they are doing it in a sanctioned session at a hospital or clinic.

Jessica Farrar, a Democrat, created the "Man's Right To Know Act" to highlight how women have been affected by targeted healthcare legislation in her state, particularly relating to abortion.

She said its rules — including a mandatory waiting period before a vasectomy procedure or receiving a prescription for Viagra, as well as a "medically-unnecessary digital rectal exam" — mirror "real TX laws and health care restrictions faced by TX women every #txlege session".

The headline stipulation would categorize ejaculation outside either a vagina or medical facility as an "act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life".


Ms Farrar told mysanantonio.com: "A lot of people find the bill funny. What's not funny are the obstacles that Texas women face every day, that were placed there by legislatures making it very difficult for them to access healthcare."

Continued

Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating as 'act against an unborn child'
 

Never_Rolled

First 10,000
Dec 17, 2018
5,798
6,349
Won’t it lead to more rape? $100 in my hand vs no charge for vagina hmmmmmm. What about anus? As a dem she is going to piss off her homo block. SongExotic2 @Schlong2 if you were a Texan I know you wouldn’t be shooting for that.
 
M

member 3289

Guest
Was gonna talk shit about it but then I read the article and saw that it was just a parody of the state's restrictive abortion laws.

It turns out there are intelligent people in Texas...
 

Never_Rolled

First 10,000
Dec 17, 2018
5,798
6,349
As early as possible of course, but the frequency is up to the pregnant women. I rightfully have no legal say in the decision.
I have always maintained the abortion issue seems backwards to me. Dems are usually for controlling peoples thoughts and actions. R’s don’t want to pay welfare to kids of single moms and or the poor once they pop them out. You would think dems would want to protect a defenseless fetus and R’s would say fuck it were not paying for that kid.

Woman obviously made bad choices but there would be millions more on welfare if it weren’t for abortion. Thousands more would wind up in prison. It seems religious people have let the bible reign over common sense. If I were king I would take benefits away from people on welfare having kids instead of paying them more. Nobody would be on welfare more then a year unless unable to work. Too much of this shit is generational.
 

sparkuri

Pulse On The Finger Of The Community
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
34,420
46,562
I have always maintained the abortion issue seems backwards to me. Dems are usually for controlling peoples thoughts and actions. R’s don’t want to pay welfare to kids of single moms and or the poor once they pop them out. You would think dems would want to protect a defenseless fetus and R’s would say fuck it were not paying for that kid.

Woman obviously made bad choices but there would be millions more on welfare if it weren’t for abortion. Thousands more would wind up in prison. It seems religious people have let the bible reign over common sense. If I were king I would take benefits away from people on welfare having kids instead of paying them more. Nobody would be on welfare more then a year unless unable to work. Too much of this shit is generational.
I don't see it that way, exactly.
But totally agree the parties are backwards.
Conservatives don't conserve, liberals want to be liberated by government control.

If a woman gets in a car accident and is physically fine "herself" but the life growing inside her dies at the fault of the other driver, is it fair that she now controls the fate of another life by saying: "I wanted that baby"?
It's senseless.

There can be no ambiguity on the matter, it is the most society-defining decision ever.
All morality(which is real & important) starts at conception.
Should abortion be illegal?
Imo, no. It should be de-criminalized.
HOWEVER, anyone performing it other than the carrier should be criminalized.
I'd encourage anyone who hasn't seen an abortion to do so.


There are parallels to the lack of personal responsibility that has demoralized culture.
We see it in bailing out banks that are "too big to fail", we see it in welfare, we see it in our lazy, snotty, ethic-less entitled youth.
And it stems at the core from a society that is confused on every topic because they've come to believe morality comes from within or together, without a greater power or intelligent design.

In WW2, soldiers swept across across the world impregnating millions.
Some detested the evil act and ripped the seed from themselves, most dying from it who tried.
Others let it grow and lived, and it became a future generation that now populates much of Europe.
And it boils down to this:
The moment YOU decide YOU are more important than the life inside you, is the moment your true morality reveals itself.
It's not just the life inside that you feel is less important than you, it's ALL life, whether you openly admit it or not.

Religion has absolutely f'd this up.
Liberty is at it's core about your decisions and your consequences.
The moment they are enabled or "relieved" by another is the moment a person or society now takes personal responsibility out of the ENTIRE equation.
Religiosity has tried to mandate "goodness" just like liberals try to mandate freedom & liberty.
They're equally at fault in their own ways.

Taking "religiosity" out of it, there was a guy(true story) who lived, died, and historians died to deliver his message that reads: "greater love has no man than this; that he lay down his life for another".

Imo, it should be de-criminalized to self, but not funded by a split society.
If you want to go underground and rip it out with a hangar, then live freely with that decision.

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
-Margaret Sanger

A hero she is not.
Sounds more like Thanos.

Whatever crap came out of her mouth was cover for her racist. eugenics-driven mind.
If it weren't for racists supporting her back then, we wouldn't even be having this discussion today.
 

Never_Rolled

First 10,000
Dec 17, 2018
5,798
6,349
I don't see it that way, exactly.
But totally agree the parties are backwards.
Conservatives don't conserve, liberals want to be liberated by government control.

If a woman gets in a car accident and is physically fine "herself" but the life growing inside her dies at the fault of the other driver, is it fair that she now controls the fate of another life by saying: "I wanted that baby"?
It's senseless.

There can be no ambiguity on the matter, it is the most society-defining decision ever.
All morality(which is real & important) starts at conception.
Should abortion be illegal?
Imo, no. It should be de-criminalized.
HOWEVER, anyone performing it other than the carrier should be criminalized.
I'd encourage anyone who hasn't seen an abortion to do so.


There are parallels to the lack of personal responsibility that has demoralized culture.
We see it in bailing out banks that are "too big to fail", we see it in welfare, we see it in our lazy, snotty, ethic-less entitled youth.
And it stems at the core from a society that is confused on every topic because they've come to believe morality comes from within or together, without a greater power or intelligent design.

In WW2, soldiers swept across across the world impregnating millions.
Some detested the evil act and ripped the seed from themselves, most dying from it who tried.
Others let it grow and lived, and it became a future generation that now populates much of Europe.
And it boils down to this:
The moment YOU decide YOU are more important than the life inside you, is the moment your true morality reveals itself.
It's not just the life inside that you feel is less important than you, it's ALL life, whether you openly admit it or not.

Religion has absolutely f'd this up.
Liberty is at it's core about your decisions and your consequences.
The moment they are enabled or "relieved" by another is the moment a person or society now takes personal responsibility out of the ENTIRE equation.
Religiosity has tried to mandate "goodness" just like liberals try to mandate freedom & liberty.
They're equally at fault in their own ways.

Taking "religiosity" out of it, there was a guy(true story) who lived, died, and historians died to deliver his message that reads: "greater love has no man than this; that he lay down his life for another".

Imo, it should be de-criminalized to self, but not funded by a split society.
If you want to go underground and rip it out with a hangar, then live freely with that decision.

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
-Margaret Sanger

A hero she is not.
Sounds more like Thanos.

Whatever crap came out of her mouth was cover for her racist. eugenics-driven mind.
If it weren't for racists supporting her back then, we wouldn't even be having this discussion today.
I don't believe we need vast amounts of the poor having more and more unwanted babies that society will responsible for. Where is the morality forcing me to pay for someone else's mistakes? In NY for example more black babies were aborted than were born. If all those unwanted babies were born what do think would happen to them? Do you think more good or bad would be brought about? This is an economics issue. How is it moral to force people to have unwanted children? How is that going to turn out for the egg and sperm donor or their larva? Why do you only see morality one sided?
 

sparkuri

Pulse On The Finger Of The Community
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
34,420
46,562
Where is the morality forcing me to pay for someone else's mistakes?
This is exactly why I say it shouldn't be publicly funded, so the rest of it is irrelevant.
'It's a you made your bed, sleep in it' responsibility that is long overdue.
It's also why we get sayings like "30 is the new 20", because it takes people an extra decade to learn what once was common sense.
What took a generation to mess up would take a generation at least to fix.
 

Never_Rolled

First 10,000
Dec 17, 2018
5,798
6,349
This is exactly why I say it shouldn't be publicly funded, so the rest of it is irrelevant.
'It's a you made your bed, sleep in it' responsibility that is long overdue.
It's also why we get sayings like "30 is the new 20", because it takes people an extra decade to learn what once was common sense.
What took a generation to mess up would take a generation at least to fix.
Welfare means without question we will be funding it. Reality doesn’t match fantasy.
 

sparkuri

Pulse On The Finger Of The Community
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
34,420
46,562
Welfare means without question we will be funding it. Reality doesn’t match fantasy.
What fantasy?
If there was no "public" funding for abortions, the cost to the public goes down.
3-1=2
If kids know that, 2-1=1.
Do you wanna pay $3 or $1?

This is basic all-economy math.
Abortion is a business.
1-10 year sucks as welfare cases are up.
10-20 less
20-30 even
30-40 profits
40-infinity bigly & controlled immigration, family value etc.
Abortions have costed this country enormously financially, morally and ethically.
The latter 2 are virtually incalculable.
 

Never_Rolled

First 10,000
Dec 17, 2018
5,798
6,349
What fantasy?
If there was no "public" funding for abortions, the cost to the public goes down.
3-1=2
If kids know that, 2-1=1.
Do you wanna pay $3 or $1?

This is basic all-economy math.
Abortion is a business.
1-10 year sucks as welfare cases are up.
10-20 less
20-30 even
30-40 profits
40-infinity bigly & controlled immigration, family value etc.
Abortions have costed this country enormously financially, morally and ethically.
The latter 2 are virtually incalculable.
Your inputs are horrible. Poor people for the most part stay poor for generations. Even if they work, they are still on govt. assistance. Paying for abortions which I am against would probably be cheaper than the lifetime of assistance these people will get.

As far as I am aware we don’t pay for abortions. If we did let’s even figure $1000 per. That’s less than what many of these people receive each month over a lifetime. Your math sucks fren. Poor shitholers coming in are taught by other shitholers how to game the system. I see this everyday.
 

sparkuri

Pulse On The Finger Of The Community
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
34,420
46,562
This bill is amazing.
By her thought process women should fall under the same deal.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Maybe some retarded Republican can introduce a bill charging women with killing life for bleeding every month.
It amazes me how stupid politicians are and how much money we give them.