General Canadian Politics eh.

[member 1013]

According to the people who are developing AI. It'll probably be AI.

Thor and the avengers already defeated Ultron

 

[member 3289]

I don't recall @Lars saying that.

The rumours here say JT's party is in tatters. He just had his indigenous female cabinet member bail on him.

He said it in private conversation. You weren't invited.

Hey @Lars check this out you fukn goof!

 

[member 1013]

He said it in private conversation. You weren't invited.

Hey @Lars check this out you fukn goof!

Don’t be mean to @ConorMcGregorsBeard

 

[Lamont Cranston]

there is going to be unpopular austerity measures in our future to pay for all the debt we have incurred in the last few years. the liberals will be long gone by then and scheer will be left to make the unpopular choices.he is going to end up being another unpopular PM like harper but thats what it is going to take to right the ship at this point

This is the truth.

Whomever gets in will be hated because they have to repair what the liberals and trudeau have done.

 

[Freeloading Rusty]

This is the truth.

Whomever gets in will be hated because they have to repair what the liberals and trudeau have done.

And the Liberals had to repair what the Conservatives had done and on and on it goes.

With that said, I didnt vote Trudeau but I find it amusing to see people who voted for JT because 'anything but conservative' was all the rage at the time.. now they are talking about how the conservatives have to clean up the liberal mess.

 

[Freeloading Rusty]

View: https://youtu.be/kdh8FZcofKM

 

[BeardOfKnowledge]

And the Liberals had to repair what the Conservatives had done and on and on it goes.

With that said, I didnt vote Trudeau but I find it amusing to see people who voted for JT because 'anything but conservative' was all the rage at the time.. now they are talking about how the conservatives have to clean up the liberal mess.

I don't find it particularly funny. It takes a level of maturity for someone to admit they were duped.

 

[Lamont Cranston]

And the Liberals had to repair what the Conservatives had done and on and on it goes.

With that said, I didnt vote Trudeau but I find it amusing to see people who voted for JT because 'anything but conservative' was all the rage at the time.. now they are talking about how the conservatives have to clean up the liberal mess.

LOL @ the Liberals repairing anything!

Sure I will concede they MAY have done somethings that were decent.but come on...LOL!

 

[member 1013]

LOL @ the Liberals repairing anything!

Sure I will concede they MAY have done somethings that were decent.but come on...LOL!

Who would win in a fight, you or the liberals?

 

[Lamont Cranston]

Who would win in a fight, you or the liberals?

I would.

 

[BeardOfKnowledge]

With that said, I didnt vote Trudeau

I guess you're going to this time around though.

 

[member 1013]

I would.

Justin Trudeau is almost as good a boxer as Dana White

 

[Lamont Cranston]

Justin Trudeau is almost as good a boxer as Dana White

LOL!

No, he's not.

He's got a jab and move game though from what I see and he sticks to his game plan.

I'd choke him out.

 

[Lamont Cranston]

As much as I dislike Trudeau, he got into the ring and was serious about this charity fight. His opponent was a moron who thought he would be smug and just beat down Trudeau. Trudeau trained for the fight and won by jabbing his way to victory after he weathered the storm. I give him props for getting in the ring, he had a lot to lose.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuSpZ3_5pTc

 

[Freeloading Rusty]

LOL @ the Liberals repairing anything!

Sure I will concede they MAY have done somethings that were decent.but come on...LOL!

It wasn't my argument, I was highlighting a common theme I see happening.

 

[BeardOfKnowledge]

You've told us you aren't going to vote for Singh @MC Gusto .I figured it was a reasonable assumption that you'd be voting for Trudeau. Unless you're throwing your lot in with Bernier or Scheer. Seems unlikely to me though.

 

[Freeloading Rusty]

You've told us you aren't going to vote for Singh @MC Gusto .

Im not sure where you're getting your info from.

Feel free to show me where I stated I would not vote for Singh.

Kind of hard to predict who one is going to vote for when platforms have not yet been provided.

 

[member 1013]

Im not sure where you're getting your info from.

Feel free to show me where I stated I would not vote for Singh.

Kind of hard to predict who one is going to vote for when platforms have not yet been provided.

Don’t lie, we all know you are a card carrying Dipper you commie!!!!!!!

 

[BeardOfKnowledge]

Im not sure where you're getting your info from.

Feel free to show me where I stated I would not vote for Singh.

Kind of hard to predict who one is going to vote for when platforms have not yet been provided.

Posts 1412-1415 you talked about him being inexperienced and not seeing leadership qualities in him.

If I felt about someone the way you do about Singh I sure as fuck wouldn't vote for them.

 

[Freeloading Rusty]

Posts 1412-1415 you talked about him being inexperienced and not seeing leadership qualities in him.

So just to be clear, you misstated my words.

 

[BeardOfKnowledge]

So just to be clear, you misstated my words.

So you didn't say:

I think the lack of leadership abilities, experience and policy specifics is what turns off many NDP supporters.

?

 

[member 1013]

Fiiiiiiight

 

[Freeloading Rusty]

So you didn't say:



?

I clearly did say that quote but that still doesn’t back up your statement.

You've told us you aren't going to vote for Singh @MC Gusto .

It’s ok man, you made an assumption (I am voting for Trudeau) based off an assumption (I would never vote for Singh) influenced by another assumption (I would never vote for anyone the right).



It’s ok to just say you were wrong or incorrect.

 

[SoupCan]

vaccinate your kids

 

[BeardOfKnowledge]

I clearly did say that quote but that still doesn’t back up your statement.




It’s ok man, you made an assumption (I am voting for Trudeau) based off an assumption (I would never vote for Singh) influenced by another assumption (I would never vote for anyone the right).



It’s ok to just say you were wrong or incorrect.

If I knew I was, I would. I'm making assumptions based on the evidence I have available. If you'd say "nah, I'm still voting for him." That'd be the end of it, instead you're being coy about the whole thing.