Upon further review and after your most generously surmised
and studious clarification, I do have a thought to which I feel qualified
to expand upon and engage in disputation.
CRT as described in the above referenced papers appears to indeed be a complex
theoretical framework with the intent of both discussing and indirectly addressing the
social construct of "racism". Specifically racism in America
Racism being defined hereto as - Racism, also called racialism, the belief that humans may be divided into separate and exclusive biological entities called “races”; that there is a causal link between inherited physical traits and traits of personality, intellect, morality, and other cultural and behavioral features; and that some races are innately superior to others. The term is also applied to political, economic, or legal institutions and systems that engage in or perpetuate discrimination on the basis of race or otherwise reinforce racial inequalities in wealth and income, education, health care, civil rights, and other areas. Such institutional, structural, or systemic racism.
RACISM | DEFINITION, HISTORY, LAWS, & FACTS
In-text: (racism | Definition, History, Laws, & Facts, 2021)
Ref: Encyclopedia Britannica. 2021. racism | Definition, History, Laws, & Facts. [online]
Available at: <
racism | Definition, History, Laws, & Facts> [Accessed 18 June 2021].
To wit my hypothesis is that CRT is far too complex to be rationally discussed on a MMA forum
and posting format and furthermore even less agreeable to parties not having credentials or
scholarship in said academic theoretical concept.
That said... To quote the eloquent Michael Myers via
Austin Powers Gold Member
"I do have some thoughts"
Ref: AUSTIN POWERS IN GOLDMEMBER (2002) - IMDB
In-text: (Austin Powers in Goldmember (2002) - IMDb, 2021)
IMDb. 2021. Austin Powers in Goldmember (2002) - IMDb. [online] Available at: <
Austin Powers in Goldmember (2002) - IMDb> [Accessed 18 June 2021]
Said thoughts being the disputation of CRT as a "social construct".
Social constructs are abstract by nature. Any construct of homo sapiens
would by order of congruence be also defined as a "social construct".
In explanation we accredit (We being society) Special Relativity
to Albert Einstein as a self construct... ie a construct constructed as
"self" and independent of "other" as in a societal "vacuum"
However one might argue that Albert Einstein functionally having a state
of "being", that is to infer a state of"mind" was also part of a larger social
construct and framework.
Tis indeed Einstein who birthed "Relativity", however such a fantastical work
and construct could not have been completed without the work and social
framework of those both around and before said mind
That is to say any construct within Homo Sapien's creation is a social construct
by definition. The self does not exist in a vacuum. The self is always a reflection
of the "other". The other being the social framework therein.
Ultimately I would say that
CRT is an esoteric, albeit, social contruct birthed from
a wider social construct of racism to which much pondering, observance and
musing is left undone.
In Summary: I can neither with confidence confirm nor deny the validity
of either argument proposed herein.