General Electile Dysfunction: an election that lasts longer than 4 days is a serious medical problem

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

sparkuri

Pulse On The Finger Of The Community
First 100
Jan 16, 2015
34,637
46,707
Screenshot_20201022-002204_Chrome.jpg
Here we go again.
Social media priming those who pay attention to it to have a complete meltdown.
 

Splinty

Shake 'em off
Admin
Dec 31, 2014
44,116
91,096
View attachment 18231
Here we go again.
Social media priming those who pay attention to it to have a complete meltdown.
Stats don't care about your feelings...or something.


It's those not paying attention that will have a meltdown.
Those paying attention recognize that 538 regularly said Trump might win last time

Those paying attention also understand probability that 13/100 is still about 1:8 -- or Russian roulette with a large capacity revolver. Something that if you had a 1:8 chance of a bullet, you'd be very focused on. Even with a 7:8 chance it won't happen.

Last time 538 gave trump a 28% chance of winninng



Regardless, Trump is less likely to win this time than last time.
 

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,318
13,922
Stats don't care about your feelings...or something.


It's those not paying attention that will have a meltdown.
Those paying attention recognize that 538 regularly said Trump might win last time

Those paying attention also understand probability that 13/100 is still about 1:8 -- or Russian roulette with a large capacity revolver. Something that if you had a 1:8 chance of a bullet, you'd be very focused on. Even with a 7:8 chance it won't happen.

Last time 538 gave trump a 28% chance of winninng



Regardless, Trump is less likely to win this time than last time.
How long did it take you to figure out how to use "Russia(n)" in this post?

My gawd! Let it go!
 

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
60,549
56,270

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
60,549
56,270
Stats don't care about your feelings...or something.


It's those not paying attention that will have a meltdown.
Those paying attention recognize that 538 regularly said Trump might win last time

Those paying attention also understand probability that 13/100 is still about 1:8 -- or Russian roulette with a large capacity revolver. Something that if you had a 1:8 chance of a bullet, you'd be very focused on. Even with a 7:8 chance it won't happen.

Last time 538 gave trump a 28% chance of winninng



Regardless, Trump is less likely to win this time than last time.
 

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
60,549
56,270
Trump having a chance of winning is fear-mongering? That seems mostly your interpreted bias of a factual statement.

Some would see that as a hopeful statement. Some would see it as fear-mongering.
They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.
 

Freeloading Rusty

Here comes Rover, sniffin’ at your ass
Jan 11, 2016
26,916
26,743
T

The Big Guy

Guest
Trump having a chance of winning is fear-mongering? That seems mostly your interpreted bias of a factual statement.

Some would see that as a hopeful statement. Some would see it as fear-mongering.
I want everyone to think trump will win. Maybe all the lazy do nothing Demonrats will stay home and watch bre bre memorials on youtube instead of voting
 

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
60,549
56,270
POMPEO’S USE OF PERSONAL EMAIL WHILE CIA DIRECTOR HIGHLIGHTS STATE DEPARTMENT’S FAILURE TO PRODUCE HIS EMAILS AS SECRETARY