My biggest issue with you is that you act like you’re always the smartest guy in the room. I said “may” have won the round. On top of that 2 of the 3 judges gave is to Stipe. So I guess my perspective was very similar to the judges and maybe the “mass retardation” is based on him actually being scored the winner of the round.
I'm well aware that 2 judges scored it for Stipe. Lots of people scored it for Stipe - hence 'mass retardation'. But if you look at those stats, re-watch the round and still think Stipe won it, then I don't know what to tell you other than I hope that your job doesn't involve operating heavy machinery. People 'feel' like Stipe won the round, which is exactly the problem. It's not based on any objective assessment of striking numbers or any understanding of how scoring actually works. It's just based on the fact that DC started to fatigue and Stipe started to do better.
Did you know I won a lot of money on Stipe as the final leg of a parlay and was going for him independently of that anyway? Hence my amazement that people scored that round for him, because it was in my interest to do the same.
As for acting like the smartest guy in the room - usually this says more about the rooms I get stuck in than me.