While it would be more prosocial if Wren's charity got $100, I would say that's a cool development to this thread.
At the end of the day, it doesn't matter if Leigh threatened Man Vs Net. In my opinion, THN is not saying Leigh intentionally threatened Man Vs Net, but that's how he and the rest of the board construed it, which is absolutely true. Leigh is not arguing against that, but whether he intentionally threatened Man Vs Net.
I think you're both right and wrong, as you both hold different positions, and I find it unlikely that one of you would gladly consent to being wrong, regardless of what evidence is produced.