That big tech's inordinate influence needs regulationHow so?
That big tech's inordinate influence needs regulationHow so?
No it's not. Start your own platform. Or go stand in your garden and talk about your ideas.When all the major platforms blacklist you it is in effect a denial of free speech in the market square
Doesn't matter. You can't even go into a publicly owned library or school and start swearing. Just because it's publicly owned, doesn't mean you get to use it. But to suggest that a private company must enable your 1st amendment rights just because it is subject to government legislation is absolute lunacy.Yes the government MANDATES service for public utilities such as the phone company...google is 100% a utility especially with it massive market share I don't know how anyone can argue otherwise
So much this. It's an entitlement problem imo.No it's not. Start your own platform. Or go stand in your garden and talk about your ideas.
Doesn't matter. You can't even go into a publicly owned library or school and start swearing. Just because it's publicly owned, doesn't mean you get to use it. But to suggest that a private company must enable your 1st amendment rights just because it is subject to government legislation is absolute lunacy.
I really don't understand why you guys think you're entitled to platforms.
Everyone is entitled and wants to feel oppressed these daysSo much this. It's an entitlement problem imo.
Yea, but us seculars are entitled to everything, because we're the only ones who get anything worth while done.Everyone is entitled and wants to feel oppressed these days
Left, right
White, black, other hues
Christian, Muslim, Jew and I guess Hindus (not buddhists doe)
I do know that this Stephan M character thinks we are very smartYea, but us seculars are entitled to everything, because we're the only ones who get anything worth while done.
Entitlement.....it’s rife in America, all day long.....the thought is that you can act like a twat anywhere, anytime because “I have rights (in the worst fingernails screeching down a chalkboard voice)”No it's not. Start your own platform. Or go stand in your garden and talk about your ideas.
Doesn't matter. You can't even go into a publicly owned library or school and start swearing. Just because it's publicly owned, doesn't mean you get to use it. But to suggest that a private company must enable your 1st amendment rights just because it is subject to government legislation is absolute lunacy.
I really don't understand why you guys think you're entitled to platforms.
What's lunacy is allowing technocratic soyface beta scum to take your rights defacto and you may agree with what they are doing now but you'll regret it later my friendNo it's not. Start your own platform. Or go stand in your garden and talk about your ideas.
Doesn't matter. You can't even go into a publicly owned library or school and start swearing. Just because it's publicly owned, doesn't mean you get to use it. But to suggest that a private company must enable your 1st amendment rights just because it is subject to government legislation is absolute lunacy.
I really don't understand why you guys think you're entitled to platforms.
I agree but it's the principle I'm defendingI’ve only seen 3 or so videos with the guy
I can state authoritatively that he’s a dweeb
Why defend a racist who uses pseudo science?I agree but it's the principle I'm defending
Are referring to his iq stuff?Why defend a racist who uses pseudo science?
I'm not sure what needs to be elaborated on, he uses pseudo science to push a racist agenda.Care to elaborate?
It's been awhile since I watched his stuff but from what I recall he references studies that gave statical data on iq from different "racial" groups...why is it wrong to reference iq statistics?I'm not sure what needs to be elaborated on, he uses pseudo science to push a racist agenda.
That makes no sense.I'm not sure what needs to be elaborated on, he uses pseudo science to push a racist agenda.
They are bunk statistics.It's been awhile since I watched his stuff but from what I recall he references studies that gave statical data on iq from different "racial" groups...why is it wrong to reference iq statistics?
I read the article and they are not bunk statics they are legit statistics but it's how you interpret what they mean that's at issueThey are bunk statistics.
Statistics Show IQ Disparities Between Races. Here's What That Really Means
Why is African IQ so low compared to Asians and whites? This question was originally answered on Quora by Harriet Washington.www.forbes.com