Yes, there is a fuck load.There are a lot of mass shootings in California and Chicago, just 2 examples.
Yes, there is a fuck load.There are a lot of mass shootings in California and Chicago, just 2 examples.
"The US saw 418 mass shootings and 15,395 deaths due to gun violence in 2019"Based off the definition of 4 victims shot within a 24 hour period, seems to be in line with other reports.
I think you might be confused. I am not arguing one way or another, I seen the study and thought it would be an interesting discussion."The US saw 418 mass shootings and 15,395 deaths due to gun violence in 2019"
" Even though mass-shooting deaths represented just a tiny fraction of total firearm deaths in 2019 (465 out of the 39,485, according to the Gun Violence Archive), the horror of mass shootings means these events have "disproportionately influenced the public discourse on firearms ownership and legislation," according to Fridel."
so there were 418 incidents where 4 or more people were shot, which resulted in 465 deaths (1.1 deaths per incident), but the horror of these incidents (where firearms are < 25% lethal) is so devastating that we have to limit the firearms people can own and make concealed weapons more difficult to license. Despite the clear empirical evidence in places where those solutions are already in place and the rate of gun violence is some of the highest in the US (LA, Chicago, NYC)
Two things to consider: do you see the intellectual dishonesty in how mass shootings are framed in this research?
And how do you reconcile the fact that the proposed solutions have already been demonstrated to, at the very least, have no positive impact on homicides per capita and other metrics?
there are at least two giant gaps in the research...I think you might be confused. I am not arguing one way or another, I seen the study and thought it would be an interesting discussion.
Regardless of the author stance on mass shootings, that doesn’t influence the overall statement of the study, does it?
- States with loose carry concealed laws face higher rates of gun homicides.
This America. Love it or GTFO, commie.Interesting to see the responses the the article based off the sub-reddit.
Glad to see most are able to provide more context than a gif or generic insult.
Reddit - Dive into anything
www.reddit.com
He's not even here....This America. Love it or GTFO, commie.
the joke skipped right off your high-n-tight, jarhead.He's not even here....
high and tights are out of regulationthe joke skipped right off your high-n-tight, jarhead.
" Hair above the ears and around the neck must get tapered from the lower natural hairline upwards at least 3/4 inch and outward not greater than 3/4 inch in order to blend with the regular hairstyle. "high and tights are out of regulation
no, only 'gun violence'.So defund the police and turn in your gun. More Utopian bullshit... I wish it worked like that.
And no, I do not own a gun.
Even if this research is right, did they consider the violent crime rates as well?