You're not making any sense.I'm really not. I haven't moved any goal posts.
Did you read this, in your study? Or just the ccn talking points?
"Limitations
Some limitations of this study are noteworthy. First, parents or caregivers retrospectively reported on cannabis use during pregnancy that occurred approximately 10 years earlier, which may have resulted in biased reporting and misclassification.71 For example, retrospective report of substance use during pregnancy 14 years earlier has been found to be more common than antenatal report and more strongly correlated with child outcomes (eg, measured birth weight and behavioral problems).71 Although these findings may indicate greater accuracy during retrospective recall, they could also reflect recall bias related to children contemporaneously experiencing problems. However, ABCD Study prevalence estimates of self-reported prenatal cannabis use align with toxicology-based prevalence estimates from national data sets collected during the years these children were born.72
Second, although the ABCD Study is, to our knowledge, the largest integrative study of child health and substance use and among the largest studies of prenatal exposure and child outcomes (the number of exposed children exceeded entire samples from other studies),21 there was a proportionally small number of participants who were exposed to cannabis prenatally, thereby reducing power. Third, THC concentration differs between fetuses whose mothers use cannabis once per month compared with once per day.15 There are limited or no data on potency, frequency (see Results), timing, or quantity of cannabis exposure in this data set. It will be important for future efforts to better understand the impact of dosage, strain, and method of ingestion.73 Fourth, while we were able to account for many known familial, pregnancy-related, and child-related confounding variables, the role of unmeasured confounders cannot be discounted. Relatedly, while we account for underlying genetic vulnerability using both familial history and PGS, it is possible that the current genome-wide association studies from which PGS weighting was estimated do not adequately represent genetic risk for the specific child outcomes under study (eTables 15 and 16 in the Supplement)."
You posted a study, that has exactly those issues I posted above, with no mention of in the CNN article.You're not making any sense.
Empirical and anecdotal evidence has proven that marijuana has a negative impact in cognitive function. I have proven this in this thread.
Meanwhile, you posted a quack study that says 90 year olds MAY benefit from minuscule doses of THC.
Quitting weed would be easier for you than continuing your nonsensical line of argument.
Now the ad hominem attacks start lol.You posted a study, that has exactly those issues I posted above, with no mention of in the CNN article.
Do I really need to explain to your low IQ brain just exactly why recall reflection bias is a problem?
How about the lack of controls that CNN fails to acknowledge? Because that's a big one, when trying to do any kind of study, of any actual value.
How about you just admit you didn't actually read the study you posted, and stop trying to make an argument I'm not. That'd be swell.
Just so you get to see this again, from your study.
"There are limited or no data on potency, frequency (see Results), timing, or quantity of cannabis exposure in this data set."
Refusing to acknowledge the limiting factors in the study you posted, which cast doubt on any and all conclusions that could be drawn, because of a flawed method of data collection. Super clever of you.Now the ad hominem attacks start lol.
I've proven that smoking weed makes you dumb. These women smoked weed while pregnant and had dumb kids.
You don't even know what you're arguing any more. Just give up and go hit the bong, cheech.
Like I said, you're grasping at straws.Refusing to acknowledge the limiting factors in the study you posted, which cast doubt on any and all conclusions that could be drawn, because of a flawed method of data collection. Super clever of you.
Lolnow scientific research showing exactly that, in mice.
Yes, it makes you dumb and lazy. Glad we agree.confirmed THC consumption can increase lethargy
You should try sex with a real woman while on the devils lettuce.it absolutely makes me dumb and lazy.
and hungry and horny
i went 45 years without ever doing pot
still never have smoked it, but i'll eat it
now i understand why so many wanna just stay home on weed all day
beating off high is awesome!
You should try sex with a real woman while on the devils lettuce.
Context matters, quote properly.Like I said, you're grasping at straws.
Lol
Yes, it makes you dumb and lazy. Glad we agree.
Post studies done on Homo sapiens if you want me to start taking you seriouslyContext matters, quote properly.
But you wouldn't want to play that game, would you?
Post studies done on Homo sapiens if you want me to start taking you seriously