There is only one round where the striking is remotely close: the 5thWhen they happen in rounds where striking is close, it makes a difference on scorecards. So yeah.......
There is only one round where the striking is remotely close: the 5thWhen they happen in rounds where striking is close, it makes a difference on scorecards. So yeah.......
Round 2 was 15-11 Mighty Mouse. Cejudo took him down and kept him down in that round.There is only one round where the striking is remotely close: the 5th
Doesn't represent quality of punches. And I don't think thise numbers are accurate.Round 2 was 15-11 Mighty Mouse. Cejudo took him down and kept him down in that round.
FightMetric LLC :.: The World's First Comprehensive MMA Statistics ProviderDoesn't represent quality of punches. And I don't think thise numbers are accurate.
Meaningless to me. MM fucked up Henry's face. Cut him, bruised him. Made him switch out of his stance to protect his damaged leg. Beat up his body and forced him to set his elbows to help protect his midsection. Henry didn't hurt MM at all with strikes. None of that is represented in that extremely broad, flat, misleading data.
Thank you my fren!I dont post here often anymore, but @Haulport this is a great thread! I think you hit the nail on the head. Nice work.
I read that three times and still don't understand! Lol!Well, he's been on the wrong end of the decision in his favor so he's even now.
Just for the hell of it I went back and rewatched the 2nd round and counted ONLY clear, clean, hard shots landed and I counted 7-3 in favor of DJ.
So you gave points to MM because HC adjusted?Meaningless to me. MM fucked up Henry's face. Cut him, bruised him. Made him switch out of his stance to protect his damaged leg. Beat up his body and forced him to set his elbows to help protect his midsection. Henry didn't hurt MM at all with strikes. None of that is represented in that extremely broad, flat, misleading data.
Just my point of view onnit.
That wasn't a well constructed sentence, I admit.I read that three times and still don't understand! Lol!
EDIT: Oh I got it now, lol
It's a sport, not a fight.Meaningless to me. MM fucked up Henry's face. Cut him, bruised him. Made him switch out of his stance to protect his damaged leg. Beat up his body and forced him to set his elbows to help protect his midsection. Henry didn't hurt MM at all with strikes. None of that is represented in that extremely broad, flat, misleading data.
Just my point of view onnit.
Logical nonsequitor. A sport is a sport because of RULES. I am clearly stating in this thread that I don't like the rules and that they should be changed and that I don't believe Henry won under the current rules. In the post u quoted I lay out how effective MM's striking was (a specifically stated part of the unified rules). No where in the unified rules does it say "the guy with the most strikes according to fightmetric...."It's a sport, not a fight.
If u switch stances because a guy is kicking ur leg then that is visual evidence (all we have to go on) that ur opponent is landing effective strikes as far as I can tell.So you gave points to MM because HC adjusted?
Technique was not Mo's strong suite......lolMy only memory of him is from the 2004 K1 super heavyweight grand Prix when they put his big ass up against tiny 170 pound Thai, Koklai. Very memorable
So if a guy avoids MM's leg kicks then you give MM a point for making his opponent adjust but if the guy doesn't then you give MM a point for landing strikes?If u switch stances because a guy is kicking ur leg then that is visual evidence (all we have to go on) that ur opponent is landing effective strikes as far as I can tell.
Gotcha. Let me figure out how to say this properly. I'll try and break it down into scenarios that are based on 10 Point Must scoring criteria and results.So if a guy avoids MM's leg kicks then you give MM a point for making his opponent adjust but if the guy doesn't then you give MM a point for landing strikes?
I know that can't be how you look at it but that's how it reads to me right now so I'm just putting it like that so you can see how I am misunderstanding you.
Except he did. Why he did has been explained to you, you're just refusing to acknowledge it.and that I don't believe Henry won under the current rules
Whatever dude. He got beat up and got only two fuckin' takedowns in 25 mins. Under the Unified rules that's a loss. You should go read the UR cause you're as clueless about them as the terrible judges.Except he did. Why he did has been explained to you, you're just refusing to acknowledge it.
don't be a stranger...the tide is risingI dont post here often anymore, but @Haulport this is a great thread! I think you hit the nail on the head. Nice work.
Totally, the summary drove the point home. Cheers for that.Gotcha. Let me figure out how to say this properly. I'll try and break it down into scenarios that are based on 10 Point Must scoring criteria and results.
...
So effectively adjusting to your opponent's strategy and negating it takes away the advantage of the opponent. Adjusting to your opponent's strategy by letting your right leg get kicked because your left leg has taken too much damage already does not help a fighter move towards gaining the striking advantage. You still keep getting hit in the right for left strategy.
Hope that makes more sense.
Here's the thing. 1) You're completely discounting what constititues "effective grappling". 2) You're willfully ignoring that both of the takedowns you're referring to took place in rounds that were close in terms of effective striking. I can see how any of the rounds that Cejudo won were close, but pretending that it was some sort of unjust robbery is craziness. I've explained it to you, @Maroon has explained it to you, the people who apply the rules disagree with you but you're insisting it's everyone else who doesn't know what they're talking about.Whatever dude. He got beat up and got only two fuckin' takedowns in 25 mins. Under the Unified rules that's a loss. You should go read the UR cause you're as clueless about them as the terrible judges.