I'm pretty sure this individual is on the forum....
How is it more beneficial to one party to vote early? I’m really confused when people keep saying this. Is one party not allowed to vote early?Altering the voting system because it's exceedingly beneficial to your party also strikes me as undemocratic.
Yes, I know people who work shift work, many. Between early polls amd the legal right to leave work in order to vote they dont have any issue taking part in the democratic process.
Uninformed people are less likely to be motivated to vote. Uniformed people almost universally support a particular political leaning.How is it more beneficial to one party to vote early? I’m really confused when people keep saying this. Is one party not allowed to vote early?
No one is changing the rules of the game. Early voting and mail-in voting have been part of the voting process for years.Uninformed people are less likely to be motivated to vote. Uniformed people almost universally support a particular political leaning.
I don't care who people do or dont vote for, but when a political party attempts to change the rules of the game that's an issue.
The DNC didn't tell people to vote by mail because polls were dangerous covid death traps?No one is changing the rules of the game. Early voting and mail-in voting have been part of the voting process for years.
WutThe DNC didn't tell people to vote by mail because polls were dangerous covid death traps?
The DNC telling people that wouldn't be changing the rules anyway, goof.You're better than this.
Yeah, it's definitely not circumventing the electoral process at all.The DNC telling people that wouldn't be changing the rules anyway, goof.
It's not changing the rules. The rules in places with mail voting allow people to vote by mail.Yeah, it's definitely not circumventing the electoral process at all.
I didn't say they changed the rules.It's not changing the rules. The rules in places with mail voting allow people to vote by mail.
You said they were attempting to change the rules. They are not.I didn't say they changed the rules.
Whatever you say, champ.You said they were attempting to change the rules. They are not.
This is why kneeblock called you an idiot and no longer engages you.Whatever you say, champ.
You're so cute when you're mad.This is why kneeblock called you an idiot and no longer engages you.
Lets see what nonvoters actually think:Uninformed people are less likely to be motivated to vote. Uniformed people almost universally support a particular political leaning.
Reflecting their low levels of political engagement, only about half of nonvoters (47%) identify with either political party; 29% identify as Democrats, 18% as Republicans while 45% are independents. Among likely voters, 68% identify with a party (37% Democrat, 31% Republican) and just 30% are independents.
Taking into account the party leanings of independents, about half of nonvoters (51%) either identify as Democrats or lean Democratic; just 30% affiliate with the GOP or lean Republican, while 20% do not lean toward either party. Among likely voters, 50% identify as Democrats or lean Democratic, 44% identify as Republicans or lean Republican, and just 6% have no party leanings.
That's some pretty interesting dataLets see what nonvoters actually think:
View attachment 18028View attachment 18029
Nonvoters are more likely to be independent than voters.
When checking on their political leaning of these non voters what you see an exchange of Republican party for independent non-party thinking. They do not lean Democrat more. They lean Republican less. It is also not nearly universal. In fact, it appears that non-voters are less politically leaning than any other group.
And this isn't weighted for the fact that this is a younger and less white crowd. They are even less left leaning than would be expected.
View attachment 18031
Free your mind, don't vote?
Says 51% of non voters lean Dem 30% lean Republican.Lets see what nonvoters actually think:
View attachment 18028View attachment 18029
Nonvoters are more likely to be independent than voters.
When checking on their political leaning of these non voters what you see an exchange of Republican party for independent non-party thinking. They do not lean Democrat more. They lean Republican less. It is also not nearly universal. In fact, it appears that non-voters are less politically leaning than any other group.
And this isn't weighted for the fact that this is a younger and less white crowd. They are even less left leaning than would be expected.
View attachment 18031
Free your mind, don't vote?
There are some easy take homes about -- poor, nonwhite, etc = disenfranchised, etc. for either overt or subtle reasons.That's some pretty interesting data
No it doesn't. I even quoted the relevant text.Says 51% of non voters lean Dem 30% lean Republican.
Team sports will be what rolls in the apocalypse, @ENOCK told me so.There are some easy take homes about -- poor, nonwhite, etc = disenfranchised, etc. for either overt or subtle reasons.
BUT, what if simultaneously this data suggest that the party system is just team sports excitement of voting, rather than voting itself.
People that vote aren't more informed, just more opinionated because they are aware a topic exists and have a side being fed to them :-X
No it doesn't. I even quoted the relevant text.
That's a break down of whether the independents lean a certain way.
What about defunding the military AND police appeals to you?Jo Jorgensen seems better than both these other motherfuckers
I apologize, I misread.No it doesn't. I even quoted the relevant text.
That's a break down of whether the independents lean a certain way.
Seems to be a trend starting around here.This is why kneeblock called you an idiot and no longer engages you.