This could of course apply to any number of things. Poster seen in the background, pets, etc. None of that would be okay at school but it seems hardly an issue because it was seen in the background on screen. The child didn't wave the BB gun around, address it anyway, etc. But more, why is there instance expulsion without any flexibility to address this with a simple family phone call first?Ka Mauri Harrison was taking a test during his online fourth-grade class earlier this month when he noticed the teacher frantically waving at him. His computer was muted, so the Louisiana 9-year-old couldn’t hear what she was upset about. And before he could unmute her, the video stream died.
He and his parents soon learned what the problem was: The teacher had caught sight of an unloaded BB gun in the boy’s bedroom.
As a result, Ka Mauri faced expulsion from school. While the punishment was reduced at a hearing this week to a suspension, his family argues the case has been a grievous mistake that threatens the future of a promising young student.
“This is an injustice. It’s a systemic failure,” Chelsea Cusimano, the family’s attorney, told The Washington Post early on Friday. “They’re applying on-campus rules to these children, even though they’re learning virtually in their own homes.”
...
According to a report from Jefferson Parish Schools shared with The Post, a Woodmere teacher saw him briefly leave the screen and then return with “what appeared to be a full-sized rifle.” He set it down, but the teacher could still see the barrel.
In fact, Ka Mauri told The Advocate, one of his younger brothers had come into the room and knocked over the toy BB gun. He bent down to pick it up, and then propped it next to his chair.
The boy, his teacher and classmates later interviewed by the school all agreed that Ka Mauri never pointed it at the camera or played with it, Cusimano said. School officials soon reached Ka Mauri’s parents by phone, who explained the weapon was an unloaded BB gun.
But school officials ruled that Ka Mauri had committed a “violation of weapons in the classroom setting."
And before you just blame zero-tolerance policies, the district:
Teacher chose this as the response. Followed by the school backing it up. Expelling a 9 year old.“We do not comment on individual student records,” Vicki Bristol, a spokeswoman for the district, told WDSU. “Regarding discipline, it is our policy that teachers and administrators may employ reasonable disciplinary and corrective measures to maintain order.”
Seems to me schools owe parents expectations before this kind of response. And I don't just mean buried in some handbook. Rather, there are bound to be a number of unique circumstances that kids get in trouble that have nothing to do with their behavior or schooling.
Does a band poster on a kid's wall get them expelled because they forget about it? Pets are banned at school, does a kid get in trouble if they listen to a lecture with a cat in their lap?