Couldn't agree more. Maybe 60-65 tops and that's being generous. Same for House/Senate and the Supreme Court...
Couldn't agree more. Maybe 60-65 tops and that's being generous. Same for House/Senate and the Supreme Court...
LMAO
There's plenty of stink on Hunter/Joe, but I doubt the emails lead to anything.
Hunter Biden, lol. Get back to us when he has an office in the West Wing and is running the covid response and functioning as the shadow Secretary of State.There's plenty of stink on Hunter/Joe, but I doubt the emails lead to anything.
Having an office in the West Wing is more upfront than selling "art" for $500k to undisclosed buyers. At least you can see the nepotism.Hunter Biden, lol. Get back to us when he has an office in the West Wing and is running the covid response and functioning as the shadow Secretary of State.
Oh wait - that'll never, ever happen.
And if it did - are you suddenly going to give a fuck about the President's unqualified, zero-experience idiot son doing all of that? Why start now?
??
Yep, that is definitely trading on his name, no argument there. Not a good look for Joe, and sheer grift from Hunter.Having an office in the West Wing is more upfront than selling "art" for $500k to undisclosed buyers. At least you can see the nepotism.
Straight out of the Clinton "Pay For Play" handbook.
Oh, and you want to talk about "upfront" and things you can "see"?Having an office in the West Wing is more upfront than selling "art" for $500k to undisclosed buyers. At least you can see the nepotism.
Straight out of the Clinton "Pay For Play" handbook.
You understand you’ve made this post probably 10 times right?Yep, that is definitely trading on his name, no argument there. Not a good look for Joe, and sheer grift from Hunter.
It's also many levels less corrupt than pretty much everything Prince Kushner and Princess Ivanka did for four years.
Hell, it's not even as corrupt as the GOP buying half a million dollars worth of Donnie the Lesser's book.
You're against relatives of Presidents blatantly grifting for personal profit based off of their relative's name, then?
When the fuck did THAT opinion start? About 11 months ago, right?
??
I'm more concerned over what I can't see than what I can see since...Yep, that is definitely trading on his name, no argument there. Not a good look for Joe, and sheer grift from Hunter.
It's also many levels less corrupt than pretty much everything Prince Kushner and Princess Ivanka did for four years.
Hell, it's not even as corrupt as the GOP buying half a million dollars worth of Donnie the Lesser's book.
You're against relatives of Presidents blatantly grifting for personal profit based off of their relative's name, then?
When the fuck did THAT opinion start? About 11 months ago, right?
??
Yes.That Hunter Biden is a real swamp creature, eh?
I guess I'll keep hammering the point until one of you manages to come up with a response to it.You understand you’ve made this post probably 10 times right?
You understand you’ve made this post probably 10 times right?I guess I'll keep hammering the point until one of you manages to come up with a response to it.
I'm happy to criticise Hunter Biden. The guys on the right? Too bitchmade to even acknowledge Prince Kushner's existence, let alone the fact that he was running more of the federal government than Trump was.
If you're going to cry about Hunter Biden, fine. He has made a LOT of money trading off of his last name, and certainly that is ethically problematic - although there is no evidence of Joe using Hunter's activities to grift money into his own pocket, as Trump did openly for 4 years.
But the reality is, you're full of shit. You can't piss and moan about Hunter when you spent years turning a blind eye to FAR worse and FAR more blatant corruption and nepotism.
If you're up in arms about Hunter but you never gave a shit about Jared, then I'm sorry, you're just plain being a massive hypocrite. Like I said, the second Hunter moves into his West Wing office, I'll be up in arms. You guys weren't - none of you gave a fuck - but I will be. ?
??