C'mon man. Are you seriously comparing Magnana to Ngannou?
Francis - 11-2 (7 KO, 4 subs) with notable wins over former UFC champ (Arlovski), brutal KO over fromer K1 champ (Reem) and just went 5 rounds in a title fight with somebody who you just created a thread on inferring he's the UFC HW GOAT.
Magnana - 11-9 (6 wins via decision) on a 5 fight losing streak who is more known for her slutty social media posts than her fighting ability.
Edit: I'll also add that you're cherry picking your examples here. You're taking a HW (traditionally known as the least technical division) and comparing them to a straw weight. The smaller weight classes have always received more praise for the technical abilities so it may be better to use any fighter in Fly weight. Ngannou was the last guy to challenge the title so lets go with Borg, Reis or Elliot. How would they compare to Magnana on a technical level?
My point is we can speculate on the skill levels of all the fighters we watch, but we have to go by the results we see in the cage. There is a subjective judgement we can make based on the way people step or feint or avoid getting submitted, but we have to go by the actual data we have. Magana is a bad example, but to examine how the women compare to the men, we can look at the bare bones numbers the ufc provides and see how they compare. I just pulled somr data from UFC.com which focuses on offensive stats, and the UFC app which includes defensive stats. The categories I chose were striking, submissions, takedowns, significant strike accuracy, significant strike defense and grappling defense. These categories, I feel, encapsulate what we would call technical execution. This is how fights have actually manifested in the cage. In the table below, you see the champ and top 5 (by ufc.com rankings) in the Men's Welterweight division and the Women's Strawweight division. I chose these two because the UFC only has 4 womens divisions, but only 2 have formal rankings. As such, rather than considering 115 the lowest weight, I'm considering it as the halfway point of the two ranked divisions and welterweight as a similar halfway point between men's divisions. Other criteria for comparing divisions could be used, e.g. based on comparable number of fights. Also, a larger sample size could be used, but I honestly just didn't feel like doing the work. In the table below you can see the results.
View: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ob9fliUOp2WOpJgiQFEaJYdIS5CIbbu7eVTnYdFKGaM/edit?usp=sharing
SW Women generally speaking land strikes at a higher rate 60% of the time versus 44% of the time for WW men. Their submission rate is about the same. WW men outperform SW in takedowns 40% to 26% of attempts. Most interestingly, women's significant strike accuracy and defense is the same as men's. Grappling defense, the men outperform the women 77% to 69%.
We can suspect that the reasons for differences in striking and grappling are attributable to men's WW having some more grappling based fighters while women's SW has more strikers. The other categories being more or less the same indicate that the technical ability you're likely to see is pretty much the same if you're watching a women's Strawweight fight or a men's Welterweight fight, at least when involving any of the top 5 or in title fights. And honestly, it's rare at least one female participant in a fight on a main card (which is the most watched part of an event and the only part you pay for) isn't going to be in the top 5.
Now we can of course point to things like style, showmanship, the way a punch look when it's thrown, the way a person sets up their submissions or takedowns, and say we don't like it. We can also say that if the women were operating at the men's strength and speed, there would be different consequences, but that's because there are differences between how women and men have operationalized MMA. In some cases, it may also be due to less years spent training, but then should women be penalized for that when there are fewer paid opportunities for them in most of MMA's feeder sports like boxing, wrestling, kickboxing and BJJ? We could say they should be barred entry until the feeder sports catch up, but today plenty of men are jumping directly into training "MMA." To me, separating them into another org or on their own cards is just discriminatory if they can participate with the same technical proficiency and stimulate fan interest. I think the best is yet to come for WMMA. Due to monetary considerations, we're just at the tip of the iceberg. Personally, I'm enjoying watching the sport develop all over again in a way.
EDIT: Changed the table settings on the doc, but it's not displaying for some reason. The link is there, but I'll try screencapping it.