M
member 3289
Guest
He'll go through an entire thread and systematically give me drunk or rainbow ratings for literally every one of my posts in the thread.
He thinks it bothers me lol
General Why was Papa John dropping N bombs on a conference call??
- Thread starter Deleted member 1
- Start date
-
- Tags
- why
He thinks it bothers me lol
It's funny to think of all the time he spent doing that... when the two guys he's doing it to are just laughing at him for wasting his time. But when you give him one, it's like you slapped his mom. No impulse control! Needs to find his zen place imo. Sad!
Hulk Hogan is back in the WWE hall of fame. People who say racist shit should be forgiven
LOL you are full of shit. You are stalking me and spamming me for over a week now with drunks and rainbows, which I don't care about, but I use to illustrate a point, you falsely try to paint a picture that you just gave a drunk on this thread, and no others, and present no context at all, which is funny and revealing about your character, and your pettiness. So stay bitter and keep drunking, and now add lying and false context to that as well lol. I see you homey
No, there is a stark difference between racism and bias. Bias is something that I think everyone has, racism, completely different. It's pretty easy to tell the difference between the 2. You know that absolutely
Last edited:
You know you are really presenting the opposite of reality. What that tells me is you are incredibly butthurt and bitter. I already been having a great day but thanks to adding to it with the laughs. Everytime I check back on this forum for maybe about the last 2 weeks, I see 7 or 8 alerts, and like everytime at least 1 is you giving a drunk or a rainbow.
So thanks for making me laugh some more today, sweet lol, good times
Go to bed... you're "DRUNK" hahah
Yup, you can't really keep up so you just go with what you are capable of, a troll post. Funny thing is it's a weeknight and you might actually be drunk, at least I hope you are because then things would make sense.
@blank
I will use an example on a situation that occurs many times a day, and is happening right now somewhere, and is a situation that has been brought up in movies, pop culture, classroom discussions maybe, and the topic likely has been on this forum at a time or 2 or more.
Here is the scenario I want to talk about to show you the difference, and I think easy difference to see, of bias that we both agree everyone has, and racism, which a very shitty minority of humans have.
So the scenario is of an Asian man or woman, middle aged or older, owning a convenience store, in a urban lower income area, with a lot of black people living there.
Let's say in this situation, that store has dealt with multiple thefts, food and alchohol thefts, perhaps even an armed robbery, and let's say in this scenario don't by people who happened to be black, and in particular young black males.
Now clearly their is a strong chance they will have a bias when they see young black males, and they could have had not had that negative bias, and that bias only has been developing due to situations they had to deal with. So in that sense, the negative bias they have, clearly they are justified. Because no one should be robbed, and not only lose the money but have to worry about also getting hurt or killed during the theft.
So bias would be them keeping an extra eye on those young black males, more so than say other people and other races. Maybe even they would check on the young black males if they went to a part of the store that was kind of hidden, to make sure they where not having items stolen. There is a strong chance the young black males in this situation, would look at them, and maybe feel it was racism, and maybe even say something to the Asian man or women, about it. But even though they would be accused of being racist, they where not. They where being bias, and in this situation they are justified, and I am telling you clearly even if others say they are racist, they are not. They are biased like all of us likely are.
Now, racism would be if as soon the young black males went to a more hidden part of the store, instead of going and quietly keeping an eye on them, if the Asian man or women went and directly just called the police, assuming they stole, or went and verbally berated them and accussed them of stealing before even checking to see if they even stole, that would be racist, and the easy and stark difference is that when they where only using bias, they still had the same worry, but they also dealt with it in a way that they where retaining both their own right and also maintaining the other person's right and simply in many ways using due diligence. But if they had go and call the cops everytime a black person goes to a hidden part of the store, before even finding out if they stole, then that would be racist because they had the same bias but then it turns into a racism because in the application they no longer are retaining the other person's right and matter of fact are violating the other person's right.
There are a million other examples, and it's only that you simply need to not mix up bias and racism and not try to say they are the same thing, Pontificate
I will use an example on a situation that occurs many times a day, and is happening right now somewhere, and is a situation that has been brought up in movies, pop culture, classroom discussions maybe, and the topic likely has been on this forum at a time or 2 or more.
Here is the scenario I want to talk about to show you the difference, and I think easy difference to see, of bias that we both agree everyone has, and racism, which a very shitty minority of humans have.
So the scenario is of an Asian man or woman, middle aged or older, owning a convenience store, in a urban lower income area, with a lot of black people living there.
Let's say in this situation, that store has dealt with multiple thefts, food and alchohol thefts, perhaps even an armed robbery, and let's say in this scenario don't by people who happened to be black, and in particular young black males.
Now clearly their is a strong chance they will have a bias when they see young black males, and they could have had not had that negative bias, and that bias only has been developing due to situations they had to deal with. So in that sense, the negative bias they have, clearly they are justified. Because no one should be robbed, and not only lose the money but have to worry about also getting hurt or killed during the theft.
So bias would be them keeping an extra eye on those young black males, more so than say other people and other races. Maybe even they would check on the young black males if they went to a part of the store that was kind of hidden, to make sure they where not having items stolen. There is a strong chance the young black males in this situation, would look at them, and maybe feel it was racism, and maybe even say something to the Asian man or women, about it. But even though they would be accused of being racist, they where not. They where being bias, and in this situation they are justified, and I am telling you clearly even if others say they are racist, they are not. They are biased like all of us likely are.
Now, racism would be if as soon the young black males went to a more hidden part of the store, instead of going and quietly keeping an eye on them, if the Asian man or women went and directly just called the police, assuming they stole, or went and verbally berated them and accussed them of stealing before even checking to see if they even stole, that would be racist, and the easy and stark difference is that when they where only using bias, they still had the same worry, but they also dealt with it in a way that they where retaining both their own right and also maintaining the other person's right and simply in many ways using due diligence. But if they had go and call the cops everytime a black person goes to a hidden part of the store, before even finding out if they stole, then that would be racist because they had the same bias but then it turns into a racism because in the application they no longer are retaining the other person's right and matter of fact are violating the other person's right.
There are a million other examples, and it's only that you simply need to not mix up bias and racism and not try to say they are the same thing, Pontificate
1
1031
Guest
And that's key to my point- people will conflate the two when it's in their interests.
MorganFreeman.jpg
Y'all need Vutu.
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
Not Ye!!!!
Papa John's founder 'isn't going quietly' — he just dragged Kanye West into fight with the board
“If you fall on concrete, that’s yo ass fault” - Kanye West on Papa John controversy
Papa John's founder 'isn't going quietly' — he just dragged Kanye West into fight with the board
“If you fall on concrete, that’s yo ass fault” - Kanye West on Papa John controversy
1
1031
Guest
I don't know if this fits here but I'm pretty sure it does (let him gain steam until he totally loses his composure):
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
And it's out!!!
View: https://m.soundcloud.com/user-350466317/full-audio-recording-of-the-laundry-service-conference-call-with-john-schnatter-may-22-2018/s-171gAH7hnci
Transcript
Papa john's press release claiming exoneration
Bombshell Recording Exonerates Papa John's Founder Of Racism Claims, Alleges Set-up By Ad Firm Hired By Former Company CEO, Steve Ritchie
/PRNewswire/ -- A recording at the heart of a lawsuit launched by Papa John's founder John Schnatter against Laundry Service, and its parent company Wasserman...
www.prnewswire.com
