Hasn't done anything? lolFeel free to take a look for yourself.
Trump’s Tax Cut Hasn’t Done Anything for Workers
Wages were supposed to rise. Instead, they’ve fallen.
Trump’s Tax Cut Hasn’t Done Anything for Workers
Hasn't done anything? lolFeel free to take a look for yourself.
Trump’s Tax Cut Hasn’t Done Anything for Workers
Wages were supposed to rise. Instead, they’ve fallen.
Trump’s Tax Cut Hasn’t Done Anything for Workers
LOL!. That kind of math only works when the company has 2 employees .....So if you add, just pulling a number out of nowhere here... 50,000 new jobs and the majority of those jobs are entry level positions. Does the AVERAGE hourly rate go up or down?
Actually, shrink it down. If you have 1 guy making $12 / hour and the company is doing well so they add another new worker at $10 / hour, your average wage rate just dropped from $12 to $11.
It works no matter how many employees you have. If you add more entry level positions, your average hourly wage will go down for the company.LOL!. That kind of math only works when the company has 2 employees .....
You should probably speak to some peoole from those places prior to speaking on their behalf. Just my opinion of course.Not really since fighting Conor is desirable, no one wants to be invaded by the U.S. Only people who win in that scenario is the military industrial complex. For everyone else involved it's just dead friends, neighbors, loved ones, etc.
I mean Trump was threatening Iran on twitter just days ago. It's not like he's just bringing this up out of the blue. It's long been a Republican goal, ever since Iran had a revolution to get rid of the U.S. installed dictator there. Bush's Iraq war was originally supposed to be a staging ground for Iran.The nice thing about accusing someone of planning to do something, is you can hold them accountable for the thing they didn't do and then claim credit for stopping them when they don't do it.
lol wutYou should probably speak to some peoole from those places prior to speaking on their behalf. Just my opinion of course.
Average hourly does not go down to $11:00 an hour if you have more than 2 employees in your example .... Maybe in "Common Core" math. but not in real math .It works no matter how many employees you have. If you add more entry level positions, your average hourly wage will go down for the company.
I never said it would. I was giving the simplest example possible. It doesn't matter how many employees you have - whether it's 2 or 20,000 - if you hire a bunch of people at entry level positions, the average hourly rate will decrease.Average hourly does not go down to $11:00 an hour if you have more than 2 employees in your example .... Maybe in "Common Core" math. but not in real math .
Well it seems to be hard for you to comprehend.I never said it would. I was giving the simplest example possible. It doesn't matter how many employees you have - whether it's 2 or 20,000 - if you hire a bunch of people at entry level positions, the average hourly rate will decrease.
This isn't hard to comprehend.
Actually, shrink it down. If you have 1 guy making $12 / hour and the company is doing well so they add another new worker at $10 / hour, your average wage rate just dropped from $12 to $11.
Mind blowing.Well it seems to be hard for you to comprehend.
And actually, yes it does matter how many employees you have. The average will go 'down', slightly but it won't be $11:00 an hour.
It's not that hard to comprehend that this only works with two employees - using your example..
If you have 10 employees making $12 an hour and you add ONE employee making $10 an hour, the average does NOT go down to $11 an hour.
I know it sucks to be wrong, but you look better when you acknowledge that you are.
I'm not sure which dummy clicked "agree" with you, but I'm sure I'm not surprised they're dumb too.
The actual amount doesn't matter to libtards. Even if it only dropped .00001%, it still gives them that negative headline.The average will go 'down', slightly but it won't be $11:00 an hour.
I'm glad you finally get it. You're welcome. Stay in school.Mind blowing.
Is that your way of saying "Oops! I realize I was wrong"?The actual amount doesn't matter to libtards. Even if it only dropped .00001%, it still gives them that negative headline.
Holy Shit!It's not that hard to comprehend that this only works with two employees - using your example..
If you have 10 employees making $12 an hour and you add ONE employee making $10 an hour, the average does NOT go down to $11 an hour.
Do the math, fucker! He's right!Holy Shit!
So you are saying that if you completely change the amounts of the original equation you'll get a different result? That's some Einstein-level shit there, brah!
I'm going to assume you are just egging me on because nobody is this fucking stupid.
And when corrected with this:Actually, shrink it down. If you have 1 guy making $12 / hour and the company is doing well so they add another new worker at $10 / hour, your average wage rate just dropped from $12 to $11.
Duubles down withLOL!. That kind of math only works when the company has 2 employees .....
:It works no matter how many employees you have.....
And when corrected with this:Actually, shrink it down. If you have 1 guy making $12 / hour and the company is doing well so they add another new worker at $10 / hour, your average wage rate just dropped from $12 to $11.
Duubles down withLOL!. That kind of math only works when the company has 2 employees .....
It works no matter how many employees you have.....
The average would be $11:91 an hour by the way. And if your hypothetical "company" has say 100 employees, adding a new $10/hr guy brings the average to $11.99/hrWell it seems to be hard for you to comprehend....And actually, yes it does matter how many employees you have. The average will go 'down', slightly but it won't be $11:00 an hour.
If you have 10 employees making $12 an hour and you add ONE employee making $10 an hour, the average does NOT go down to $11 an hour.
Damn skippy. Welcome back.Do the math, fucker! He's right!
Damn. You put some time into that one.Actually, only someone who is "fucking stupid"
would say this:
And when corrected with this: Duubles down with
:
And when corrected with this: Duubles down with
And when given an example of "no matter how many employees":The average would be $11:91 an hour by the way. And if your hypothetical "company" has say 100 employees, adding a new $10/hr guy brings the average to $11.99/hr
Do you get it now?
I don't expect you would. But keep talking about "libtards" who are "fucking stupid" bro.
Damn skippy. Welcome back.
But not to $11Damn. You put some time into that one.
"It works no matter how many employees you have"
Correct. Add an entry level job, average wage goes down.
I know you're just being a tool, but I appreciate the effort.
Do the math, fucker! He's right!
Contard's strategy number 2 when you fail an argument, call someone a tool. I appreciate the fact that you're being a bitch, and it must hurt to be wrong, but just because you are a educated hillbilly Bumpkin too bad, doesn't mean you can change mathematics to fit your post.Damn. You put some time into that one.
"It works no matter how many employees you have"
Correct. Add an entry level job, average wage goes down.
I know you're just being a tool, but I appreciate the effort.
an educated hillbilly, imo.just because you are a educated hillbilly Bumpkin too bad, doesn't mean you can change mathematics to fit your post.
I think you read his post wrong. He said that adding in employees at an entry level wage would reduce the overall average wage. He plucked those numbers out of thin air to give a simple example. Of course if you change any of those numbers in the example, then the outcome would change. I'm sure he assumed everyone would realize that.I'm glad you finally get it. You're welcome. Stay in school.
.
No, uneducated. Autocorect while driving.an educated hillbilly, imo.
I thought it was a pretty clear and concise statement. The idea that people whom live under dictatorships want things to stay the way they are is completely erroneous. Mind you, if you're using terms like "Bush's Iraq War" you may not have a very strong comprehension of the realities of the geopolitical landscape.lol wut