General Lets talk about the Kavanaugh allegations and confirmation

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

Kav will be confirmed as Supreme Court Justice???

  • Yes, he's voted into the Supreme Court

  • No, the vote fails or his nomination is withdrawn


Results are only viewable after voting.
M

member 1013

Guest
I heard somewhere he was saying he didn’t even lose his virginity till after college.

I think that is worse than the rape allegation and should instantly remove him from consideration.

You guys really want a fuckin dork like that on the bench?
 

GJdeux

It's SAND
Mar 2, 2015
614
590
I hate to admit I was glued to the TV all day. Even cancelled a client :-/ Was good tho. I sort of feel bad for her, but...not really
 

KWingJitsu

ยาเม็ดสีแดงหรือสีฟ้ายา?
Nov 15, 2015
10,311
12,693
The Dems were talking when I wrote it.

The whole thing is a clown show. It's frightening that these people are running our country
The (R)aeps are running/ruining the country so yeah, sounds about right.
 

Hauler

Been fallin so long it's like gravitys gone
Feb 3, 2016
48,555
60,551
The (R)aeps are running/ruining the country so yeah, sounds about right.
I've already given out more raises in the short time Trump has been in there than I did during Obama's entire presidency.
 

Hauler

Been fallin so long it's like gravitys gone
Feb 3, 2016
48,555
60,551
She was likeable. Honest. I think something happened - but Kav was also convincing. So maybe something happened and she just has the wrong guy?

The questions from the democrats were straight up embarrassing. Feinstein got called out for holding the info and she fumbled all over herself trying to explain it. The Dems basically proved this was what we all knew it was - partisan obstruction.

Some grandstanding by some of the Republicans.

The whole thing was a bit of a clown show.
 
M

member 3289

Guest
I've already given out more raises in the short time Trump has been in there than I did during Obama's entire presidency.
You can thank Obama for that. He inherited a recession whereas Trump is just riding the wave.
 

Freeloading Rusty

Here comes Rover, sniffin’ at your ass
Jan 11, 2016
26,916
26,589
Ford explaining the lack of specific details in her memory:

“Also, just the level of norepinephrine and epinephrine in the brain that sort of encodes …. memories into the hippocampus so the trauma-related experience is locked there, whereas other details sort of drift.”
 

Freeloading Rusty

Here comes Rover, sniffin’ at your ass
Jan 11, 2016
26,916
26,589
John Kerry torches 'sad' Ford-Kavanaugh hearing: 'The fix is in'
Former Secretary of State John Kerry called the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Thursday with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and his accuser Christine Blasey Ford a "disgrace."

He particularly didn't like how the GOP majority did not force Mark Judge, Kavanaugh's friend who Ford claims was in the room when she alleges Kavanaugh forced himself on her at a 1980s Maryland house party, to testify.

Kerry delved into the question of "What's the matter with us?" during a sit-down interview at the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin, talking about how "we're all angry" with the result of the 2016 election.

"But this Washington is completely dysfunctional," he continued. "I don't know how many of you watched today, but that was sad. That was really sad."

He went on to decry Judge's absence.

"How you could possibly have a vote on a lifetime appointment for the Supreme Court of the United States when someone has said there was a person in the room with me when this terrible thing happened — and they don't even talk to him and call him to be a witness," he said.

"That's a disgrace — it's wrong," he said, adding, "Everybody sees that the fix is in."

View: https://twitter.com/bobbycblanchard/status/1045468969480536064
 

Freeloading Rusty

Here comes Rover, sniffin’ at your ass
Jan 11, 2016
26,916
26,589
Republican senators say Brett Kavanaugh committee vote to go on as scheduled Friday - CNNPolitics
The Senate Judiciary Committee vote on whether to favorably recommend Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court will happen as scheduled Friday morning, though top GOP senators did not appear to know as of Thursday night whether enough key Republican votes had been convinced to confirm Kavanaugh.
Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley repeatedly declined to answer questions Thursday night from reporters as he repeatedly said, "we're meeting at 9:30" -- a reference to the committee meeting where the panel is scheduled to vote on whether to give Kavanaugh a favorable recommendation.
When asked by the media if the nomination come to the full Senate floor for a vote, Grassley responded "Depends on what happens tomorrow."
The announcement to keep the current schedule comes fewer than two hours after the Senate Judiciary Committee wrapped its day-long, blockbuster hearing of Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, a woman who accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault.
Kavanaugh's future now appears to lie in the decisions of a handful of key Republican senators. At least one long-undecided Republican senator, Bob Corker of Tennessee, announced his support for Kavanaugh just before 9 p.m. ET on Thursday night.
"While both individuals provided compelling testimony, nothing that has been presented corroborates the allegation," Corker said in his announcement. "There is no question that Judge Kavanaugh is qualified to serve on the Supreme Court, and in a different political environment, he would be confirmed overwhelmingly."
The decision by Corker, who is retiring at the end of his term in January, has occasionally fought with the President, leaves three key Republican senators to watch: Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine and Jeff Flake of Arizona.
Those three GOP members and Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia were spotted going into an office on the Capitol to meet privately before their broader Republican conference meeting.
Republicans can advance Kavanaugh's without any support from Democrats, but given their 51-49 seat majority in the chamber, Kavanaugh's supporters can only lose one vote and still advance his nomination.
"We are still talking," Manchin told CNN leaving the meeting. "There are no decisions on anything. There are some concerns that people have and we're going to try to close the loop."
Flake is a particularly unique position as he is the only member of this group who also sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is currently still scheduled to vote on whether to sign off on Kavanaugh's nomination Friday morning. GOP leaders had pushed for a full Senate vote on Tuesday, October 2.
Sen. John Cornyn, who as majority whip is the second ranking GOP member in the chamber, expressed optimism following a Republican meeting Thursday night that Kavanaugh's nomination will be favorably reported out of the committee on schedule.
Asked by if he is confident that Kavanaugh can advance out of the committee, he said, "I am optimistic, yes."
GOP senators told reporters that members meeting behind closed doors said the committee vote would happen as previously scheduled Friday morning and that the first procedural vote will take place on the Senate floor Saturday.


View: https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald/status/1045455570877190144
 
Last edited:

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,474
13,952
Ford explaining the lack of specific details in her memory:

“Also, just the level of norepinephrine and epinephrine in the brain that sort of encodes …. memories into the hippocampus so the trauma-related experience is locked there, whereas other details sort of drift.”
I was shocked she said this. Too bad they didn't have any experts to contradict her explanation.
 
Last edited:

Shinkicker

For what it's worth
Jan 30, 2016
10,474
13,952
Trauma, PTSD, and Memory Distortion

Our memories are not perfect reconstructions of the past. Instead, remembering a past event is a combination of processes, piecing together many separate details, and making inferences to fill in the gaps to create a coherent whole. Normally, these inferential processes serve us well, allowing us to make fast and accurate decisions about what we’ve seen and done. But no system based on inferences will be 100% accurate.

Our current drives, biases, stereotypes, and expectations can all affect that inferential process, fundamentally distorting what we ‘remember.’ While it might be easy to accept that our memories for mundane experiences can be distorted in such a way, people have long clung to the notion that traumaticmemories are different, that they are protected from any kind of memory distortion.

In fact, converging evidence demonstrates that experiences of trauma, whether a single event (e.g., a sexual assault) or a sustained stressful experience that might involve multiple trauma types (e.g., experiences at war) are also vulnerable to memory distortion. In fact, traumatic memory distortion appears to follow a particular pattern: people tend to remember experiencing even more trauma than they actually did. This usually translates into greater severity of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms over time, as the remembered trauma “grows.” (For research articles documenting this, see the references cited in this post




Simply put, over-remembering trauma usually leads to poorer mental healthoutcomes. In one example, Southwick et al. asked Desert Storm veterans at 1 month and 2 years after their return from service, whether certain events occurred during that service (e.g., experiencing sniper fire, sitting with a dying colleague). They found 88% of veterans changed their response to at least one event and 61% changed more than one. Importantly, the majority of those changes were from “no, that did not happen to me” to “yes, that happened to me.” Not surprisingly, this ‘over-remembering’ was associated with an increase in PTSD symptoms.

Why would this be? From an evolutionary perspective, it would not seem adaptive to remember an event as more traumatic over time; that would increase emotional pain and the crippling symptoms of PTSD, thus delaying recovery.

One possible explanation is that, while the errors themselves are not adaptive, they are an unavoidable byproduct of an otherwise powerful and flexible memory system. This is sort of like the human ACL: although it is a weak spot in our knees, it is a consequence of an otherwise positive adaptation: bipedalism. It may be that over-remembering trauma—just like other kinds of memory errors—are the result of a failure in something called the source monitoring process.

Briefly, according to the Source Monitoring Framework, people do not store the details of an experience in their memory accompanied by labels specifying their origins. Instead, they rely on heuristics, such as how familiar the event details feel, to determine whether a remembered detail actually occurred or was merely suggested or imagined. Critically, post-event processing—such as actively imagining new details or experiencing unwanted intrusive thoughts—can increase the familiarity of new details enough that people may mistakenly claim those new details as genuine memory traces. This is memory distortion.

More.
....



Trauma, PTSD, and Memory Distortion
 
Last edited:

Freeloading Rusty

Here comes Rover, sniffin’ at your ass
Jan 11, 2016
26,916
26,589
I was shocked she said this. Too bad they didn't have any experts to contradict her explanation.
She is the expert.

Degree in Experimental Psychology
Masters Degree in Clinical Psychology
PhD in Educational Psychology
and a 2nd Masters Degree in Epidemiology

I dont think anyone of us have any ground to question her on her grasp of the human brain, trauma and memory formation.
 

Freeloading Rusty

Here comes Rover, sniffin’ at your ass
Jan 11, 2016
26,916
26,589
Trauma, PTSD, and Memory Distortion

Our memories are not perfect reconstructions of the past. Instead, remembering a past event is a combination of processes, piecing together many separate details, and making inferences to fill in the gaps to create a coherent whole. Normally, these inferential processes serve us well, allowing us to make fast and accurate decisions about what we’ve seen and done. But no system based on inferences will be 100% accurate.

Our current drives, biases, stereotypes, and expectations can all affect that inferential process, fundamentally distorting what we ‘remember.’ While it might be easy to accept that our memories for mundane experiences can be distorted in such a way, people have long clung to the notion that traumaticmemories are different, that they are protected from any kind of memory distortion.

In fact, converging evidence demonstrates that experiences of trauma, whether a single event (e.g., a sexual assault) or a sustained stressful experience that might involve multiple trauma types (e.g., experiences at war) are also vulnerable to memory distortion. In fact, traumatic memory distortion appears to follow a particular pattern: people tend to remember experiencing even more trauma than they actually did. This usually translates into greater severity of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms over time, as the remembered trauma “grows.” (For research articles documenting this, see the references cited in this post




Simply put, over-remembering trauma usually leads to poorer mental healthoutcomes. In one example, Southwick et al. asked Desert Storm veterans at 1 month and 2 years after their return from service, whether certain events occurred during that service (e.g., experiencing sniper fire, sitting with a dying colleague). They found 88% of veterans changed their response to at least one event and 61% changed more than one. Importantly, the majority of those changes were from “no, that did not happen to me” to “yes, that happened to me.” Not surprisingly, this ‘over-remembering’ was associated with an increase in PTSD symptoms.

Why would this be? From an evolutionary perspective, it would not seem adaptive to remember an event as more traumatic over time; that would increase emotional pain and the crippling symptoms of PTSD, thus delaying recovery.

One possible explanation is that, while the errors themselves are not adaptive, they are an unavoidable byproduct of an otherwise powerful and flexible memory system. This is sort of like the human ACL: although it is a weak spot in our knees, it is a consequence of an otherwise positive adaptation: bipedalism. It may be that over-remembering trauma—just like other kinds of memory errors—are the result of a failure in something called the source monitoring process.

Briefly, according to the Source Monitoring Framework, people do not store the details of an experience in their memory accompanied by labels specifying their origins. Instead, they rely on heuristics, such as how familiar the event details feel, to determine whether a remembered detail actually occurred or was merely suggested or imagined. Critically, post-event processing—such as actively imagining new details or experiencing unwanted intrusive thoughts—can increase the familiarity of new details enough that people may mistakenly claim those new details as genuine memory traces. This is memory distortion.

More.
....



Trauma, PTSD, and Memory Distortion
Lol are you trying to counter a doctor of psychology with an article from Psychology Today?