That may have came across better than half dead looking chuck and nancy.Do you reckon they'll roll out a ginger with cum all over his lips for the rebuttal again?
That may have came across better than half dead looking chuck and nancy.Do you reckon they'll roll out a ginger with cum all over his lips for the rebuttal again?
Paul Manafort, former campaign chair for U.S. President Donald Trump, shared polling data during the 2016 presidential campaign with a business associate accused of having ties to Russian intelligence — and prosecutors say he lied to them about it, according to a court filing Tuesday.
Surely this will spell the end of the presidency.
Not as much as you love em, Fuðflogi.You really hate white men huh?
Yeah, that’s why I live in Asia.Not as much as you love em, Fuðflogi.
How bout that Galt, you are pretty much famous!Yeah, that’s why I live in Asia.
No. Mexico is not paying more, so Mexico is not paying for the wall.
I think you took the wrong point from my post. My point is that occupational risk is not relevant to discussing labor distribution in the government. For the workers it is, but unfortunately their only recourse for altering those conditions is through political mechanisms. The US, Russia, China, and several countries around the world have used their defense industries as their largest government employer. This is due to a high level of investment in the industry as an employment sector, having less to do with the actual scope of mission or any of the rhetoric.Do coal miners do the desired bidding of the populace regardless the potential consequences?
Except that the dude in Wyoming gets weekends, and evenings to do with as he pleases. There's also a 0 percent chance that the dude in Wyoming can get a phone call saying he's being moved to Kabul National Park because they're short staffed. The sacrifice that military servicepeople make is so vastly different from any other publicly funded occupation it's kind of laughable that people are trying to create an equivalence.
Lol @ Taken by the Viking Prince, might have to hit up amazon.How bout that Galt, you are pretty much famous!
Google image search Fuðflogi :
Thailand shoulda built that wall to keep that trash heap out of the motherland.How bout that Galt, you are pretty much famous!
Google image search Fuðflogi :
The fact that they allowed these two to brutally counterpoint the president is pretty damning. I thought they only allowed that for State of The Unon speeches.Pelosi - terrible speaker, breathes heavily into mic, not convincing
Schumer - best speech of the night. Great job neutralizing his New York accent. Was convincing, terse, effective. Closed well.
For any second-language speakers reading this, please know that a New York or New Jersey accent is never good in any situation.
Ever.
That's been going on for years. It's really nothing new.The Pelosi / Schumer rebuttal was...odd
Is dedicated national TV time voicing opposition to the President going to be a thing now?
So after the president addresses the nation, we'll have a politician doing his best Cousin Vinny...
Very productive.
They do it after State of the Union - that's a thing and accepted as normal.That's been going on for years. It's really nothing new.
That's also because the President generally doesn't address the nation like this unless it's a natural disaster or a declaration of war. Things where generally there's at least a projection of unity between the parties. This was Trump campaigning and naming enemies followed by two assholes looking like vampires.They do it after State of the Union - that's a thing and accepted as normal.
But other than campaigns - I don't recall anything like that. Opposing views are generally expressed via statements and interviews. Maybe I'm not remembering the other times an opposing viewpoint was granted a national TV audience immediately after the president addressed the country? I don't know - it felt weird.
Yeah. I guess Trump's addressing of the nation was more political than your typical situation, so that's a little odd in itself.That's also because the President generally doesn't address the nation like this unless it's a natural disaster or a declaration of war. Things where generally there's at least a projection of unity between the parties. This was Trump campaigning and naming enemies followed by two assholes looking like vampires.
Pure shit show all around.
Defeated as in their control. There was a map that showed isis control before trump that was fully red with a little green and the other night the map was fully green with a little red. They have lost their control and lost all that they had. They are defeated. They are not eradicated and never will be. You can’t stop Muslim extremists. Trump is doing a great job and lots of great things have happened under his watch. I’m sorry you can’t see it, I’m loving it over here. Must suck to be on your side lolThe National Security Advisor just said ISIS was not defeated.
What is your definition of defeated?
From Bolton just the other day:
I definitely want the UN human rights commission (whom they appointed to be headed by Syria ) investigating western nations to make sure everything's on the level.
Maybe they could settle on a border "solid-fence"It feels like we are settling in for a war of semantics.
Dems agree we need better borders, but want nothing to do with a "wall"
Trump has been talking about a "wall" for so long he will see it as a loss if he concedes to anything other than a physical barrier from the Pacific to the Gulf.
Unfortunately I don't know that there is a single adult in Washington that can mediate the issue so we can all move forward.
An aesthetic obstruction.Maybe they could settle on a border "solid-fence"