I guess,...but to the best of my knowledge, experiments and studies have shown, at the very least, evolution explains adaptations on the micro level. If that is false or not shouldn't matter to anyone's psychological or emotional well-being.
If you're referring to the segment which more/less gets started at 39:20 (and goes on for 5 minutes or so) then that is a mischaracterization of what was stated. If you're not referring to that segment then which part are you on about?
This may be the post of the week and we're just at the halfway point.
Ya'll need to be homeschooled
It's not evolution that shows adaptations, it's adaptations that show adaptations.
Fukn hack
I don't have a horse in this race so this isn't me debating one way or the other, but can't we call those adaptations an expression, at least on some scale, of evolution?
Well that's exactly what got the ball rolling.
@BirdWatcher
How Scientists Captured the First Image of a Black Hole - Teachable Moments | NASA/JPL EduWell that's exactly what got the ball rolling.
It's been called that forever, but we need to be clear on premise and definition or it goes off the hinges.
Yes, you can call that evolution, truthfully, but not beyond what we can scientifically replicate or observe into other realms, like one entirely different species into another. Inherently the word implies a different meaning.
This is why I called this the "premier religion" of our time.
It, like others, requires no empirical data and the timeframe is beyond human recorded history and beyond proof.
It's conjecture, like Black Holes.......
My thoughts will probably be offensive to some but I'll answer the question, as you've asked.@Leigh , what do you think about all this?
I assume you're including me in that, as you gave me a drunk rating. I'm not sure what I posted that was prickish or cuntish but I'm sorry I offended you.
I already went you big meanie!!!
Have you been offended by every post which you've given a drunk rating?
Just to be fair, yes there are some people who will accept simper explanations of things but there are also some who have not accepted any simple or complex solutions to this one. Some people are in the unconvinced camp regarding a great many things and hence become thought dissidents or conspiracy theorists, etc.
nobody keeps score when conspiracy hypothesis become common knowledge and are proven correct
Okay, I get what you're saying as far as adaptation vs evolution and that's the point where I'm not 100% on board with what I understand the theory of evolution to entail. People have told me that micro-evolution has been observed and replicated in laboratories but any time I ask, I get something that is a vague reference to something, or a some asshole who instead of trying to relate what he knows, floods me (flexes) with scientific terms to sufficiently obscure.Well that's exactly what got the ball rolling.
It's been called that forever, but we need to be clear on premise and definition or it goes off the hinges.
Yes, you can call that evolution, truthfully, but not beyond what we can scientifically replicate or observe into other realms, like one entirely different species into another. Inherently the word implies a different meaning.
This is why I called this the "premier religion" of our time.
It, like others, requires no empirical data and the timeframe is beyond human recorded history and beyond proof.
It's conjecture, like Black Holes.......
That's not the case here.
