That's obviously not going to work. The only solution imo is a return to 1949 Armistice lines.
I like the idea of an access highway between Gaza and the West Bank.
Yeah, so what do? In another thread, it was suggested we should internationally threaten to cripple Israel's economy if they don't agree to 1967...what about the Palestinians? Do they get the same hammer?
Palestinian leadership (those not aligned with Hamas which refuses Israel's existence) have been fine with the 1967 borders and that has been fine with most everyone including the Israelis (present PM not withstanding), previous US, etc. The realignment plan was good with 95% of those borders. No significant push to 1949 has happened in our lifetime so I'm not sure why 1949 or 67. It just makes the negotiating harder as Israel DOES care about land and the Palestinian sticking point has never been about more than 1967 land...but rather Jerusalem and right of return.
1949 lines or 1967, the Palestinians will reject. 1949, Israel will reject.
Access highway is of course the right answer. I am always amazed at the arguing over a state comprised of two pieces including one land locked.
Is there another state designed as such? Kalinigrad Oblast is the closest thing I can think of right now.