I think you're a good person despite being from Florida, I don't hold it against @conor mcgregor nut hugger either.
General Thoughts on Georgia shooting?
- Thread starter Thuglife13
- Start date
Good memory. Two kids that were 5&7 at the time. Crazy that was five years ago. Whatever changes you made are quite noticeable, solid work M8.
Apologies for the thread derail fellas.
I smoke more weed, got rid of my cunt ex, and got me a 6 year younger country woman. Country women are great.
Monica indeed.
Talcum X trying to cash checks his bitch ass can't afford...
Ugh, I cant stand that cock suckerTalcum X trying to cash checks his bitch ass can't afford...
4chan is going all in with the memes...
@Splinty how do you feel about this now. If this last image is true, thats fairly damning.
T
The Big Guy
Guest
The hammer and boots..
The prior fleeing from police trying to stop him and he was armed at a school..
Not to mention the man who "shouldn't have been armed" could have been aware this individual carried handguns previously.
That's a look into a direction alot of people dont want to go.
Last edited by a moderator:
They did know. The father worked on the case where the guy was arrested with a gun at the school, and the guy stole a pistol out of one of their trucks.
T
The Big Guy
Guest
That's what I meant but I made a retarded sentence. My new phone's dumber than me
Take it all with a grain of salt. This is what 4chan does....Take a bunch of images, apply insinuation without fact, pimp the case from there.
I just rewatched the video:
1. "hammer" is not clearly a hammer
2. "hammer" is on the right side of the road when he was running on the left. He held the hammer for a really long time then ditched it a little far from him but not real far? Seems strange.
3. No evidence "the hammer" is anything other than road debris.
Both his shoes and that item will be in evidence, especially if its a hammer. Don't get roped in. There's a reason the two of those memes have replaced "nigger" with "jogger". They aren't out for the truth.
4chan can sometimes go full nerd and detective the shit out of something, but its rare...like monkeys writing shakespeare.
Usually they just get the wrong suspect, make some random circles on moles, and edit their images for "proof"
I went to 4chan once years ago, it was, interesting. Thanks for the advice in ignoring them.
T
The Big Guy
Guest
Hes a terrorist by definition. So I should be able to say fuck that guy without anybody crying too hardTalcum X trying to cash checks his bitch ass can't afford...
The U.S. Code of Federal Regulations defines terrorism as "the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives"
2 guys aren't really a 'segment of the civilian population'.
but you're cute when you reach.
T
The Big Guy
Guest
I'm talking about his statement to georgia you clown2 guys aren't really a 'segment of the civilian population'.
but you're cute when you reach.
why is it not in the best interest of Georgia to hold these men accountable? I think convening a Grand Jury is warranted to determine accountability, and it looks like the State of Georgia agrees.
There are multiple things in the road.
The 4chan pic appears to be edited. I yanked the frames out myself from liveleak. at no different zoom, level changes, etc could I make a boot shape appear at that point in the video they are using.
Zoom and slow mo raw frames....
View: https://gfycat.com/unsteadyamusedargentinehornedfrog
Could be Tims, could be nike's (which is what the news originally reported he was wearing).
Why does this matter? It doesn't beyond pointing out the subversive narratives being painted that don't acknowledge their motivations.
I think looking at the edited hammer picture then the real picture is damning. Theres no way the top picture with the hammer so clearly viable is real. So a reasonable person, which I am clearly one, would conclude the rest of the "proof" is bullshit as well. If this case was so clear cut they wouldn't need to fake proof.There are multiple things in the road.
The 4chan pic appears to be edited. I yanked the frames out myself from liveleak. at no different zoom, level changes, etc could I make a boot shape appear at that point in the video they are using.
Zoom and slow mo raw frames....
View: https://gfycat.com/unsteadyamusedargentinehornedfrog
Could be Tims, could be nike's (which is what the news originally reported he was wearing).
Why does this matter? It doesn't beyond pointing out the subversive narratives being painted that don't acknowledge their motivations.
My pic is the only real angle to see both items .. so it is a different frame at a different angle.
As the car drives up on to the "hammer" it becomes more clear but I haven't done any analysis to see if it's edit or not. what's more important is the context that with multiple linear objects in the street, one out of context is being reported as something it isn't clearly. It's easy to lob accusations, but That's not good critical thinking here..
I am interested to see what the grand jury does.
I think he clearly throws something which could be a hammer, a crowbar, or some other item. I find it odd as well his choice of shoes and location where he was jogging but at the end of the day I still think the two guys in the truck were in the wrong from everything we know so far. The media outrage as usual is uncalled for though for their lack of caring when cases include the opposite of what happened in this case like bones nose posted yesterday...
T
The Big Guy
Guest
They usually indict because there is no defense. Its citizens in a room with a prosecutor who goes over all the evidence. Nobody is there to refute or have a debate about the nature if the evidence and usually its before a defense lawyer can have evidence removed due to illegal search or bias or many things.
A grand jury might hear you had 5 kilos in your trunk and 1 in the front seat. But at trial that evidence from the trunk could be suppressed because it was found during an illegal search.
So it's a one sided argument
From a Georgia lawyers website
"The purpose of the grand jury is to consider the evidence presented and decide whether there is enough probable cause (evidence) to indict you for the charged crime. The prosecutor is the only one who offers evidence for the grand juries. They can call witnesses, and they are not bound by the rules of evidence or the Constitution. Therefore, they can basically present any evidence as long as it is not perjured testimony. So while hearsay is excluded under the Rules of Evidence in standard trials, it is admissible in front of the grand jury. Furthermore, grand jury hearings happen in private, behind closed doors. What happens before the grand jury is not something the prosecutor can talk about to the public and the jurors can never talk about what occurred in the grand jury."