Someone commenting on the GA lawsuit being tossed.
M
member 3289
Guest
SAD!
Sad that I won't get to collect that $100 when Trump is ultimately declared victorious. But I'll settle for another four years of your torment.
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
There's lots of lawsuits. Unless one of them has the election hinging and changes it, I don't see how the bet is off?
If you watch the results and truly believe a blue result would have been red except for a judges ruling after the fact that changes the result, great toss it.
Red becomes blue or blue becomes red.
Georgia goes blue or red and Trump still would have lost, that doesn't change the result. I'd ask you to honor it.
Pro tip, most/all printers do this as well
Printer tracking dots - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
He bithced about the results not being observed.
M
member 1013
Guest
No he doesn’t understand our system. Coalitions are fine.
It is a million dollar Soros headline after all, they would use the word flee.
Especially when you and your campaign team are leaving, in a bus, together, so a Jewish opportunist decides to take advantage of a moment to ask a question he knows can't be answered.
How many videos do you want me to post of people doing this to Quid Pro Jo三?
M
member 1013
Guest
Trump campaign loses lawsuit seeking to halt Michigan vote count
A Michigan judge has dismissed a lawsuit by President Donald Trump’s campaign in a dispute over whether Republican challengers had access to the handling of absentee ballots.
Judge Cynthia Stephens noted that the lawsuit was filed late Wednesday afternoon, just hours before the last ballots were counted. She also said the defendant, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, was the wrong person to sue because she doesn’t control the logistics of local ballot counting, even if she is the state’s chief election officer.
A Michigan judge has dismissed a lawsuit by President Donald Trump’s campaign in a dispute over whether Republican challengers had access to the handling of absentee ballots.
Judge Cynthia Stephens noted that the lawsuit was filed late Wednesday afternoon, just hours before the last ballots were counted. She also said the defendant, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, was the wrong person to sue because she doesn’t control the logistics of local ballot counting, even if she is the state’s chief election officer.
M
member 3289
Guest
The US picks other countries' presidents much faster than their own!
*obvious joke, can't believe I didn't think of it back in 2000.
*obvious joke, can't believe I didn't think of it back in 2000.
M
member 1013
Guest
President Donald Trump called in his lawyers to shore up his dimming re-election prospects, but legal experts said the flurry of lawsuits had little chance of changing the outcome but might cast doubt on the process.
As Trump’s paths to victory narrowed, his campaign on Thursday was ramping up legal challenges and filed its latest case in Nevada.
On Wednesday, the campaign sued in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia and asked to join a pending case at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Experts said the litigation serves to drag out the vote count and postpone major media from declaring Biden the victor, which would have dire political implications for Trump.
“The current legal manoeuvring is mainly a way for the Trump campaign to try to extend the ball game in the long-shot hope that some serious anomaly will emerge,” said Robert Yablon, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School. “As of now, we haven’t seen any indication of systematic irregularities in the vote count.”
...
There is no consistent strategy there,” said Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. She said the campaign was “throwing theories at a wall to see if anything sticks for long enough to muck up the waters.”
Edward Foley, who specializes in election law at the Moritz College of Law, said the cases might have merit but only affected a small number of ballots and procedural issues.
“But merit in that sense is very different from having the kind of consequence that Bush v. Gore did in 2000,” said Foley.
...
Experts said the lawsuits and claims of fraud might be aimed at softening the sting of being bounced from office by calling the process into question.
“The litigation looks more like an effort to allow Trump to continue rhetorically attempting to delegitimize an electoral loss,” said Joshua Geltzer, a professor at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy & Protection.
As Trump’s paths to victory narrowed, his campaign on Thursday was ramping up legal challenges and filed its latest case in Nevada.
On Wednesday, the campaign sued in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia and asked to join a pending case at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Experts said the litigation serves to drag out the vote count and postpone major media from declaring Biden the victor, which would have dire political implications for Trump.
“The current legal manoeuvring is mainly a way for the Trump campaign to try to extend the ball game in the long-shot hope that some serious anomaly will emerge,” said Robert Yablon, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School. “As of now, we haven’t seen any indication of systematic irregularities in the vote count.”
...
There is no consistent strategy there,” said Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. She said the campaign was “throwing theories at a wall to see if anything sticks for long enough to muck up the waters.”
Edward Foley, who specializes in election law at the Moritz College of Law, said the cases might have merit but only affected a small number of ballots and procedural issues.
“But merit in that sense is very different from having the kind of consequence that Bush v. Gore did in 2000,” said Foley.
...
Experts said the lawsuits and claims of fraud might be aimed at softening the sting of being bounced from office by calling the process into question.
“The litigation looks more like an effort to allow Trump to continue rhetorically attempting to delegitimize an electoral loss,” said Joshua Geltzer, a professor at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy & Protection.
Of course I'll honor the bet, unless it goes to the Supreme Court. Legal posturing just started. I imagine it'll get a lot messier before we reach some sort of conclusion. Dead absentee voters and anomalous turnout numbers won't go uncontested.
M
member 3289
Guest
M
member 1013
Guest
You’re a hack, stop stealing original content from real internet comedians
M
member 3289
Guest
Gonna write up a final solution to your incessant shit talking.
Chill out
@Toelocku, that's a fucked up thing to say