Again, he says he doesn't know the source of the virus. Also Rubio calls for reparations for those with deleted tweets.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilt_NcaIIRk
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilt_NcaIIRk
There is nothing about the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of masks in that email that is new or different information. You are supposed to wear a mask to help catch your droplets in case you're infected. And this email was from Feb 2020 when they were saying basically that if there aren't enough masks to go around, the sick person needs to wear the mask.We're required by law to wear the masks that's he's saying are ineffective in that email.
There is a lot of emailsThere is nothing about the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of masks in that email that is new or different information. You are supposed to wear a mask to help catch your droplets in case you're infected. And this email was from Feb 2020 when they were saying basically that if there aren't enough masks to go around, the sick person needs to wear the mask.
We have known for a very long time, the regular procedural masks don't protect you very much. They never said they did I don't think -- they said the masks that might help protect you, like n95, should be saved for hospital workers.
Seriously, this email is nothing, especially in the context of the time that it was written.
I'm going to reiterate, we have legislation based around wearing masks that by his admission are effectively useless. You can look back through this thread and fine people saying "I dont really think these masks do anything" and being raked over the coals for it.There is nothing about the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of masks in that email that is new or different information. You are supposed to wear a mask to help catch your droplets in case you're infected. And this email was from Feb 2020 when they were saying basically that if there aren't enough masks to go around, the sick person needs to wear the mask.
We have known for a very long time, the regular procedural masks don't protect you very much. They never said they did I don't think -- they said the masks that might help protect you, like n95, should be saved for hospital workers.
Seriously, this email is nothing, especially in the context of the time that it was written.
Fauci is a demonstrated liar, bruv.Again, he says he doesn't know the source of the virus. Also Rubio calls for reparations for those with deleted tweets.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilt_NcaIIRk
It's nothing to joke about.I'm not joking though.
He says the drugstore masks are not effective in keeping "out" virus. That has always been the case? He also says they should be worn by infected people to prevent them from spreading the virus to others. That has also always been the case?I'm going to reiterate, we have legislation based around wearing masks that by his admission are effectively useless. You can look back through this thread and fine people saying "I dont really think these masks do anything" and being raked over the coals for it.
I believe one of the emails also mentioned that due to the size of the virus drug store masks dont keep it in either. But I could be wrong, I tried to do a bit of a dive last night but the political leaning of the news outlet determines which emails they're reporting which should kind of be the real story here.He says the drugstore masks are not effective in keeping "out" virus. That has always been the case? He also says they should be worn by infected people to prevent them from spreading the virus to others. That has also always been the case?
Maybe there is another email that demonstrates the falsehoods he has told the public (and I do believe there have been some), but this one isn't it.
ineffective as a stand-alone prophylactic, that's been known for a century.We're required by law to wear the masks that's he's saying are ineffective in that email.
of course that's what he's saying now. The issue is what he was saying when Peter Daszak and Kristian Andersen were trying to cancel anyone who said otherwise - because what's he's known hasn't changed.According to him, he doesn't know the origins of the virus. He also doesn't know if the lab is the origin. Also according to him, he is unaware of anyone that does know that information, but he's very open minded.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJKoQEaPLuE
you mean beside the fact that it reduces the amount of viral load you dispel in to the world?Literally wearing a nappy for your face for no reason
you mean beside the fact that it reduces the amount of viral load you dispel in to the world?
Fixed!I'll dispel a viral load on you!you mean beside the fact that it reduces the amount of viral load you dispel in to the world?
Here are some you can read yourselfI believe one of the emails also mentioned that due to the size of the virus drug store masks dont keep it in either. But I could be wrong, I tried to do a bit of a dive last night but the political leaning of the news outlet determines which emails they're reporting which should kind of be the real story here.
Read myself, eh?Here are some you can read yourself
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
I've read a few so far. The email addresses are redacted, which is annoying when the plain name is missing. There is one email already that I would have liked to know the receiver of.
There is also a message that was redacted. It doesn't seem like a controversial interaction at all, so that makes it even more interesting that it was redacted. Annoying.
Yeah well I can tell you that everyone seems to feel the same way since a lot of news articles on them include samples and discussion of emails mostly just in the first bunch.Read myself, eh?