My understanding is that each person can only receive one civil judgment against them under the law. The doctor should have confessed to a friend who "sued" him thereby blocking any other lawsuits coming.
Have you ever performed an abortion?My understanding is that each person can only receive one civil judgment against them under the law. The doctor should have confessed to a friend who "sued" him thereby blocking any other lawsuits coming.
But I suspect this is all a goal of bringing The Texas law to court
Have you ever performed an abortion?
If not, would you?
Don't be coy, motherfucker.
#NoSpinZone
Supreme Court sets Dec. 1 for arguments in challenge to Roe v. Wade
The state law has been blocked by lower courts because it directly violates <i>Roe’</i>s protections for pre-viability abortions.www.politico.com
Jonathan F. Mitchell, the architect of Texas’ abortion ban, submitted his own brief over the weekend pushing the court to not only overturn Roe but other precedents protecting abortion access and what he calls “court-invented rights to homosexual behavior and same-sex marriage.”
Jesus. Are there still people who think foster kids or adoption and abortion are equivalent to each other?
i think it's more about the hypocrisy of "Right To Life" actually being "Obligation To Birth".Jesus. Are there still people who think foster kids or adoption and abortion are equivalent to each other?
That's a fair point, but it makes "muh foster kids" a hypocritical analogy.i think it's more about the hypocrisy of "Right To Life" actually being "Obligation To Birth".
nobody cares about the kids, born or unborn.
why? you can argue for a right to choose and an effective foster care system using the same data.That's a fair point, but it makes "muh foster kids" a hypocritical analogy.
This is correct. However it's clearly not the argument being made.*why? you can argue for a right to choose and an effective foster care system using the same data.