Where is @Pak protector's penis in this, good sir?
So big it's like the world is a microbe on the shaft of my ding dongWhere is @Pak protector's penis in this, good sir?
I think this sun would fill up the Solar System out to Neptune's orbitI introduce you to UY Scuti:
View attachment 51342
Correction. Jupiter's orbit. Still an incredible volume.I think this sun would fill up the Solar System out to Neptune's orbit
You know less about astronomy than you do politics.Correction. Jupiter's orbit. Still an incredible volume.
I'm guessing a star that size would have a "surface" so tenuous, like 1/1000 the density of our air, it could be called a vacuum on Earth.
Surface Gravity Comparison:You know less about astronomy than you do politics.
I can't correct you because I'm dumb, but isn't a vacuum just an absence of air - well, absence of anything really?Surface Gravity Comparison:
The Surface Gravity of the Sun is 274 m/s²,while the Surface Gravity of UY Scuti is 0.003162 m/s².
I can't say if that's near vacuum, not a mathematician
Feel free to correct me. I'm happy to be corrected.
My (incorrect) understanding is that the surface gravity of such a star would be limited by its distance from the core mass.
More precisely, a vacuum is a lack of any atmospheric gases.I can't correct you because I'm dumb, but isn't a vacuum just an absence of air - well, absence of anything really?
Not sure what that would have to do with gravity.
Unless you are saying Scuti would have zero gravitational pull. Assuming you had a really, really effective heat shield that would keep you from burning up. And you had 5000 years to get there, assuming you have a ship that travels in excess of 670 million mph.
I guess.More precisely, a vacuum is a lack of any atmospheric gases.
A star's center of mass rules its gravitational sphere of influence. The further you get from it, the weaker its effect becomes.
It masses more in the central region, the atomic density is crushing. As you rise closer to the surface, the matter thins out (relatively).
Earth's atmosphere thins out at high altitude for this reason.
So an incredibly large star's gases will approach what we would call a vacuum if it were to replace ours.
The circumference of a star doesn't necessarily mean it has a lot of mass, which is what counts gravitationally. UY Scuti is definitely scheduled for a type II supernova in some millions of years.I guess.
I would assume a big ass star has some big ass gravity.
This things gonna eat itself and implode. Probably become a black hole. I'm totally talking out my ass now.
I fuckin knew it.UY Scuti is definitely scheduled for a type II supernova in some millions of years
I wish I could live to see a SN here in the Milky Way, but the occurrences are one in three hundred years.I fuckin knew it.
Me?!Hilarious that the one poster who earned my ignore list got banned.
#Goodcall
I’m a rooster illusionNonsense. If you were banned, you wouldn't be here.
I sell these fine leather jackets!
All we are is, like, dust in the wind, dude.I’m a rooster illusion