Society The Joseph R Biden Show

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up
M

member 3289

Guest
Canceling Title 42 is a colossal mistake. Even if you're in favor of the cancellation, it should be done when border services are more adequately prepared. They won't be adequately prepared next month.


My guess was that the Progressive wing of the party was putting pressure on Biden to end it, and lo and behold, I was right.


This is the kind of thing that puts Donald Trump back in office.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
We'll never forget what the media did in 2020 and there's a special place in hell for them...


What the difference between Jack Dorsey's fake news and Rudy and 4chans fake news that said there was CP on the laptop?

Both protected hunter by covering up the actual story. Both were false.

My original posts were just to add it to the discussion. Somehow I'm permanently linked to the story now?
Same to you. You posted endless fake news on behalf of 4chan on this subject but act like Twitter is unique in it's role here. You got played, doubled down when I even showed you the cam model you were posting as hunters niece, and now post about how I'm a troll and how right you were that the laptop was real. But you posted almost entirely fake stuff about the laptop which is part of the reason that this story didn't stick. That same fake stuff was spammed on Twitter and elsewhere leading people to reject the whole thing. You've got a hand in why people didn't believe the laptop.
 

TheFifthScallop

Who am I kidding? I’m a whore.
Amateur Fighter
Nov 15, 2015
5,812
7,305
I posted that the secret service is renting a 30k a month mansion for Hunter Biden. That is all.
You can post whatever you’d like and it doesn’t change what I posted.
and I’m telling you this is something every president does. It doesn’t make it right, but it’s pretty standard. I’m just not sure what your angle is with it.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
Less than 100 years ago, the vice president had no security at all. Granted, the vice president's role has been strengthened over the last decades, but still it's in start contrast to spending millions to protect a president's child who is an adult and not in government.

I'm ignorant to the amount of apparatus and staff it takes to provide security to an individual private citizen such as Hunter Biden. But it's kind of gross that both Trump and Biden were allowed to bill the secret service for them staying on their property and that the law requires that the secret service pay their rent.
You would think that receiving millions of taxpayer subsidized security would be enough not to then attempt to profit a few thousand to rent them a room. The story about the Trump's refusing to let the secret service use the restroom so they spent thousands renting a studio nearby just to go to the bathroom is ridiculous. The secret service agents are standing around in your house all the time. Let them take a leak and pay a house cleaner to come in. Instead renting an entire apartments just to go to the bathroom.
 
D

Deleted member 1

Guest
Seems like a continuous waste of money.

Does it bother you?

It definitely seems like it would be cheaper to just park a car in shifts outside of his house. I mean just how much protection should he get?
How far do we go with this. Are we going to nieces and nephews? Is it based only on perceived value as a target?
 

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
61,274
56,625
What the difference between Jack Dorsey's fake news and Rudy and 4chans fake news that said there was CP on the laptop?

Both protected hunter by covering up the actual story. Both were false.
This is hilariously convoluted logic.
 

MMAHAWK

Real Gs come from California.America Muthafucker
Feb 5, 2015
15,240
33,233
It definitely seems like it would be cheaper to just park a car in shifts outside of his house. I mean just how much protection should he get?
How far do we go with this. Are we going to nieces and nephews? Is it based only on perceived value as a target?
You shouldn’t get it in a mansion. He’s getting protected because he is a fuck up not because he’s an important asset to this country.
 
T

The Big Guy

Guest
What the difference between Jack Dorsey's fake news and Rudy and 4chans fake news that said there was CP on the laptop?

Both protected hunter by covering up the actual story. Both were false.



Same to you. You posted endless fake news on behalf of 4chan on this subject but act like Twitter is unique in it's role here. You got played, doubled down when I even showed you the cam model you were posting as hunters niece, and now post about how I'm a troll and how right you were that the laptop was real. But you posted almost entirely fake stuff about the laptop which is part of the reason that this story didn't stick. That same fake stuff was spammed on Twitter and elsewhere leading people to reject the whole thing. You've got a hand in why people didn't believe the laptop.
The story was buried to protect the democratic nominee for president. That's the only reason it was buried. It could have been aliens or anything else and the media would have lied about russian collusion or some other BS.

Even if there was no CP you still have a POS crackhead selling his fathers services to foreign interests and a bunch of leftist morons trying to deflect the story anyway possible.

Theres still multiple people saying theres all type of weird shit on that laptop and the fbi has given the basic "cant confirm or deny" which usually means there is an investigation

Also I dont think you are blind enough not to expect that it will be covered up as much as possible. It's already been shown the lengths the left is willing to go to protect them and it's been acknowledged his computer was c ol compromised before it ever went to the computer repair shop. The FBI will cover up as much as they can just like the missing gun and initial laptop story

Keep trusting everything they say
 

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
61,274
56,625
The story was buried to protect the democratic nominee for president. That's the only reason it was buried. It could have been aliens or anything else and the media would have lied about russian collusion or some other BS.

Even if there was no CP you still have a POS crackhead selling his fathers services to foreign interests and a bunch of leftist morons trying to deflect the story anyway possible.

Theres still multiple people saying theres all type of weird shit on that laptop and the fbi has given the basic "cant confirm or deny" which usually means there is an investigation

Also I dont think you are blind enough not to expect that it will be covered up as much as possible. It's already been shown the lengths the left is willing to go to protect them and it's been acknowledged his computer was c ol compromised before it ever went to the computer repair shop. The FBI will cover up as much as they can just like the missing gun and initial laptop story

Keep trusting everything they say
Listen, man. You're just going to have to accept that Hunter is a fossil fuel mastermind and that Burisma valued him so highly, they were willing to pay him to be on their board even though he doesn't speak the language.
 

MMAHAWK

Real Gs come from California.America Muthafucker
Feb 5, 2015
15,240
33,233
Absolutely. Does the previous administrations secret service bill bother you?
Yes

Do you think ABC news shouldn’t have wrote the article about Hunter because Trump?

when articles were posted about Trumps spending did you try to downplay because of Obama?
 
T

The Big Guy

Guest
Listen, man. You're just going to have to accept that Hunter is a fossil fuel mastermind and that Burisma valued him so highly, they were willing to pay him to be on their board even though he doesn't speak the language.
I've already accepted that. I'm just glad his father played no role in that or any other foreign dealings and they are in no way comprised
 

BeardOfKnowledge

The Most Consistent Motherfucker You Know
Jul 22, 2015
61,274
56,625
I've already accepted that. I'm just glad his father played no role in that or any other foreign dealings and they are in no way comprised
Of course not. Definitely nothing to do with the Ukrainian government he had nothing to do with installing.
 
T

The Big Guy

Guest
Of course not. Definitely nothing to do with the Ukrainian government he had nothing to do with installing.
Dont give that russian propaganda any air. It was an election for the people by the people and ukraine definitely isnt the corrupt playground it appears to be
 

Hauler

Been fallin so long it's like gravitys gone
Feb 3, 2016
48,555
60,551
Canceling Title 42 is a colossal mistake. Even if you're in favor of the cancellation, it should be done when border services are more adequately prepared. They won't be adequately prepared next month.


My guess was that the Progressive wing of the party was putting pressure on Biden to end it, and lo and behold, I was right.


This is the kind of thing that puts Donald Trump back in office.
I figured they were getting rid of it just because it started under Trump.

But I also figured the reports of a giant wave of crossings were being grossly exaggerated by the conservative talking heads.
 

TheFifthScallop

Who am I kidding? I’m a whore.
Amateur Fighter
Nov 15, 2015
5,812
7,305
Yes

Do you think ABC news shouldn’t have wrote the article about Hunter because Trump?

when articles were posted about Trumps spending did you try to downplay because of Obama?
No, they can definitely write the article, but it’s just an interesting one when you look back on every administrations spending. Articles like that are meant to get people worked up. A majority of people don’t even read the article, let alone think about prior administrations spending, especially when it’s “their team”. Should the public have access to that information? Yes. Should news medias paint it in a way that deliberately gets people worked up? No, but they want the clicks.

I never even tried to downplay here.