so what?
the natural right to defend yourself from other humans, even ones in fancy hats with rich friends, hasn't changed.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5n3h3_u6yOc
sorry for the music.
right to defend oneself yes. we just disagree with what weapons that implies
i do not think people should be allowed to have:
- nuclear bombs
- attack helicopters
- tanks
- mines
- mortars
- rocket propelled grenades
im sure you and i would agree on at least some of those
when it comes to guns, i dont think most humans have the right to them. i think background checks and training at a minimum
and i havent thought through the topic in details, but i would probably go much further in terms of home defense laws. guns for home defense make more defense in rural areas then in populated areas where police are more readily available
i understand that arguments will then be made about the laws disproportionately affecting lower class. but ... i dont give a fuck
----
i also think other things would lessen the amount of violent acts of despair:
- universal healthcare
- higher minimum wage
- universal basic income