M
member 1013
Guest
it’s fine, this is all fine. you just hate da whytesReplacement theory isn't providing the inspiration for any racist massacres, I was told this by a clown.
??
it’s fine, this is all fine. you just hate da whytesReplacement theory isn't providing the inspiration for any racist massacres, I was told this by a clown.
??
You should use your own words rather than copy & pasting from Wikipedia, broseph.you should really learn about the 130 years of replacement theory before you start accusing people of unfamiliarity bruv
i’m in meetings, i shouldn’t even be on my phoneYou should use your own words rather than copy & pasting from Wikipedia, broseph.
I really feel like I missed out on running for my life and possibly taking a round or two every time I was at a party and a brawl broke out between rivals.10 injured, 3 law enforcement officials hurt after gunfire erupts in Charleston, S.C.
Shots were fired in the area of 41 South Street around 11:40 p.m. Monday, the site of a vacant lot where a large party was taking place with more than 100 people believed to be in attendance, Charleston Police Chief Luther T. Reynolds said in a news conference Tuesday afternoon.
So you're the guy that calls a meeting then spends all the time on his phone and afterwards gets his pa to write up a summary. I see you.i’m in meetings, i shouldn’t even be on my phone
So did Tucker say all that or did he say the DNC wants more Hispanics to come into the country and you're just conflating them all together?The Great Replacement (French: Grand Remplacement), also known as the replacement theory,[1][2] is a white nationalist[3] far-rightconspiracy theory[4][5][6] disseminated by French author Renaud Camus. The original theory states that, with the complicity or cooperation of "replacist" elites,[a][4][7] white European populations are being demographically and culturally replaced with non-white peoples—especially from Muslim-majority countries—through mass migration, demographic growth and a drop in the birth rate of white Europeans.[4][8][9] Since then, similar claims have been advanced in other national contexts, notably in the United States. Mainstream scholars have dismissed these claims as rooted in a misunderstanding of demographic statistics and premised upon an unscientific, racist worldview.[10][11][12]
the idea is “they” (usually my ppl) are purposefully lowering white birth rates through policy and “replacing” them with “coloureds”, usually blacks, muslims or hispanics.
spare me
lolSo did Tucker say all that or did he say the DNC wants more Hispanics to come into the country and you're just conflating them all together?
You're adorable when you're in "Everyone is anti-Semitic" mode.
that’s not what i’m saying. but fanks bruv.You're adorable when you're in "Everyone is anti-Semitic" mode.
Except dogs.Fun fact: there is no replacement because we are all the same. We are all humans
why do u hate da anglo saxon race?Fun fact: there is no replacement because we are all the same. We are all humans
This is so fucking true. Happened multiple times in this thread.Oh shit. Lol
AR-15s aren’t assault rifles’
One of the most common tactics used by gun culturists is to try to belittle their opponents’ knowledge of firearms.
By their lights, anyone who calls an AR-15 or one of its many variants an “assault rifle” is uninformed and not worth listening to.
They’ll tell you the only “real” assault rifles are “selective fire,” which gives the user the choice of shooting multiple bullets with one trigger pull, while the AR-15 fires only one bullet per pull.
And they almost always point out that AR doesn’t stand for assault rifle, but for Armalite rifle, after the company that originated it.
The AR does stand for Armalite, but that’s about as true as this myth gets. The gun was developed under a Pentagon bid specification — I’ve read it — specifically seeking a “semi-automatic assault rifle” for troops.
Armalite sold the design to Colt, which cranked out two versions — the military M-16 in selective fire and the civilian AR-15 in semi-automatic.
AR-15s and their copycats — along with cheaper Chinese knockoffs of the Soviet AK-47 — were called assault rifles in gun catalogs, gun magazines and by owners until well into the 2000s.
But the term got a bad reputation after assault rifles became the weapon of choice for random mass shootings, because they’re the most capable and formidable weapons a civilian can buy.
In 2009, the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a gun industry trade association, coined a new and softer term — “modern sporting rifle” — and demanded everybody use it.
Gun magazines and lots of mainstream news sources, including the Associated Press which I ordinarily respect, have changed their style to refer to assault rifles by more warm-and-fuzzy euphemisms.
I won’t.
an armed society is a polite society
eugenics worked out great for my ancestors in the 30s and 40s doe‘An armed society is a polite society’
This oft-repeated quote comes from an old Robert Heinlein novel called “Beyond this Horizon.”
I’ve read the book.
It’s mostly about genetic engineering and eugenics, but the setting is in a dystopian future where trivial social conflicts are settled by gunfights.
The first significant thing that happens in the book is a guy getting killed over some spilled food. Those who don’t want to fight have to wear the “brassard of peace” signifying lower social status and their automatic surrender to the will and whim of any armed individual they encounter.
I wouldn’t want to live like that, and neither should you.
this gets the ammosexuals so hard‘An armed society is a polite society’
This oft-repeated quote comes from an old Robert Heinlein novel called “Beyond this Horizon.”
I’ve read the book.
It’s mostly about genetic engineering and eugenics, but the setting is in a dystopian future where trivial social conflicts are settled by gunfights.
The first significant thing that happens in the book is a guy getting killed over some spilled food. Those who don’t want to fight have to wear the “brassard of peace” signifying lower social status and their automatic surrender to the will and whim of any armed individual they encounter.
I wouldn’t want to live like that, and neither should you.
I won’t hold that against you.eugenics worked out great for my ancestors in the 30s and 40s doe