M
General The Supreme Court has overturned Roe vs Wade.
- Thread starter John Lee Pettimore
- Start date
A lot. According to you, around 37% of them.
you think over a third of your friends and neighbors are sub-human?
No. I think the people who think a 10 year old rape victim shouldn’t have access to abortion and should carry the fetus are retarded pieces of shit. It’s not even an argument.
sure it is. If you say it's not an argument, then like a quarter of the US is so stupid they shouldn't be allowed to vote - no?
Lol. Do YOU believe a 10 year old victim of rape who gets pregnant should have access to an abortion?
got you beat!
Yes. Now lets flip that. Do you think someone should have access to an elective non emergency abortions 8-9 months into the pregnancy?? because that's legal where I live.
No. That’s murder. And people aren’t doing that. If they are, I’m guessing it’s a medical emergency.
M
member 1013
Guest
so the state doing a bad jerb?
Thats bait^^^
as I've said ad nauseum, I think all citizens have a right to privacy and body autonomy.
And we’re done!
M
member 1013
Guest
except I think that people who disagree with me have a valid perspective, and that we all have to come together and demand legislation that protects the rights of the people.
Calling people "scum" or "piece of shit" is the opposite of that.
Yes. Because privacy and body autonomy.
No cite me some situations where pregnancies were aborted under those circumstances.
as you said you guess. It's perfectly legal in the state i'm living in. It is most definitely happening.
"Collectively, the data show that large fractions (likely a majority) of late-term abortions are performed for elective reasons rather than reasons of fetal or maternal health. This conclusion is consistent whether from official data, from studies published by pro-abortion groups, or from testimony by abortionists."
Data on late-term abortions in the United States
www.johnstonsarchive.net
I only see those people as pieces of shit in the instance we were talking about. Why does 37% of the country want to ruin the life of a 10 year old who was raped?
Why not just post the link?
it's a certain type of hubris that says "i know best for you".
i'm not that guy. In this situation, sure. What if the 10 yo demanded to carry it to term, despite the risk to her life and everything else?
If they demanded to carry it to term, that is THEIR CHOICE.
picture from my phone. I edited it to post the link right after
but heres another as well
In truth, purely elective late-term abortions are common, while fetal anomalies are tragic outliers. A 2013 study published by the pro-choice Guttmacher Institute found that fetal anomaly was not one of the primary drivers of late-term abortion. Rather, late-term abortions are usually of entirely healthy pregnancies where the woman was either unable to receive an earlier abortion (often due to a failure to recognize the pregnancy or a logistical delay) or changed her mind about keeping the child (often after a falling out with a spouse or partner).
The Reality of Late-Term Abortion in America | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson
But there’s no way to justify a categorical opposition to late-term abortion bans just because cases exist where exceptions may be appropriate.
what if it's a fetus with Downs or genetic diseases with a 100% mortality in the first 2 years?
are you saying that there are circumstances where a woman should be forced to carry a fetus to term?